Advertisement

Estuaries

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 342–351 | Cite as

Effects of hypoxic disturbances on an estuarine nekton assemblage across multiple scales

  • Lisa A. EbyEmail author
  • Larry B. Crowder
Article

Abstract

Disturbances influence ecological communities over a wide range of scales. We investigated the effects of localized hypoxic disturbances on an estuarine fish assemblage at several spatial (m2 and 10s km2) and temporal (days, seasons, years) scales in a multivariate framework (temperature, salinity, depth, dissolved oxygen). We examined whether seasons, years) scales in a multivariate framework (temperature, salinity, depth, dissolved oxygen). We examined whether there were consistent changes in fish and crustacean estuarine assemblage characteristics along environmental gradients and whether these relationships were altered by hypoxic disturbances. We also investigated at what scale dissolved oxygen concentration may be influencing the structure of motile estuarine assemblages and whether the size of the hypoxic zone altered its effects on the estuarine assemblage. Hypoxic disturbances altered fish and crustacean assemblages along the depth gradients that were present during well-oxygenated periods. Species diversity, richness, and catch rates were lower in hypoxic patches than in oxygenated areas. Dissolved oxygen concentration remained an important explanatory variable for patch-level assemblage dissimilarity, species richness, and diversity when data were aggregated across seasons. When we examined the data at a larger scale, by aggregating information across the study area, we did not detect influences of hypoxia on assemblage structure. Fish moved out of local hypoxic zones, but remained within the estuary even in years with extensive hypoxia. There was no effect of size of the hypoxic distrubance on whether organisms responded to hypoxia or on diversity or richness of the study site. These results suggest that these local disturbances play an important role in structuring motile species assemblages at a patch-level within an estuary, but regional factors such as recruitment and migration are important in influencing species assemblages for the entire estuary over months and years.

Keywords

Fish Assemblage Dissolve Oxygen Concentration Blue Crab Marine Ecology Progress Series Catch Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bianchi, G. 1992. Demersal assemblages of the continental shelf and the upper slope of Angola.Marine Ecology Progress Series 81:101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boesch, D. F., R. H. Burroughs, J. E. Baker, R. P. Mason, C. L. Rowe, andR. L. Siefert. 2001. Marine pollution in the United States: Significant accomplishments, future challenges. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
  3. Borman, F. H. andG. E. Linkens. 1979. Pattern and Process in a forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Breitburg, D. L. 1992. episodic hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: Interacting effects of recruitment, behavior, and physical disturbance.Ecological Monographs 62:525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breitburg, D. L., T. Loher, C. A. Pacey andA. Gerstein. 1997. Varying effects of low dissolved oxygen on trophic interactions in an estuarine food web.Ecological Monographs 67:489–507.Google Scholar
  6. Breitburg, D. L., K. A. Rose andJ. H. Cowan, Jr. 1999. Linking water quality to fish recruitment: Predation mortality of fish larvae in an oxygen-stratified water column.Marine Ecology Progress Series 178:39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buzzelli, C. P., R. A. Luettich, Jr.,S. A. Powers, C. H. Peterson, J. E. McNinch, J. L. Pinckney andH. W. Pearl. 2002. Estimating the spatial extent of bottom water hypoxia and benthic fishery habitat degradation in the Neuse River estuary, North Carolina.Marine Ecology Progress Series 230:103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caddy, J. F. 1993. Towards a comparative evaluation of human impacts on fishery ecosystems of enclosed and semi-enclosed seas.Reviews in Fisheries Science 1:57–95.Google Scholar
  9. Diaz, R. J. andR. Rosenberg 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna.Ocean and Marine Biology Annual Review 33:245–303.Google Scholar
  10. Eby, L. A. 2001. Response of a fish assemblage to frequent and infrequent disturbances in an estuarine ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  11. Eby, L. A. andL. B. Crowder. 2002. Hypoxia-based habitat compression in the Neuse River estuary: Context-dependent shifts in behavioral avoidance thresholds.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:952–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frost, T. M., D. L. DeAngelis, S. M. Bartell, D. J. Hall, andS. H. Hurlbert. 1988. Scale in the design and interpretation of aquatic assemblage research, p. 229–260.In S. R. Carpenter (ed.), Complex Interactions in Lake Communities, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Goodall, D. W. 1978. Sample similarity and species correlation, p. 99–149.In R. H. Whittaker (ed.), Ordination of Plant Communities. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Howell, P. andD. Simpson. 1994. Abundance of marine resources in relation to dissolved oxygen in Long Island Sound.Estuaries 17:394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlson, R. H. andH. V. Cornell. 1998. Scale-dependent variation in local versus regional effects on coral species richness.Ecological Monographs 68:259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keister, J. E., E. D. Houde, andD. L. Breitburg. 2000. Effects of bottom-layer hypoxia on abundances and depth distributions of organisms in Patuxent River, Chesapeake Bay.marine Ecology Progress Series 205:43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Kruskal, J. B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika 29:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Legender, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm?Ecology 74:1659–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lenihan, H. S. andC. H. Peterson. 1998. How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oyster reefs.Ecological Applications 8:128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenihan, H. S., C. H. Peterson, J. E. Byers, J. K. Grabowski, G. H. Thayer, andD. R. Colby. 2001. Cascading of habitat degradation: Oyster reefs invaded by refugee fishes escaping stress.Ecological Applications 11:764–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology.Ecology 73:1943–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luettich, R. A., C. S. Martens, J. E. McNinch, H. W. Paerl, J. L. Pinckney, C. H. Peterson, M. Alperin andJ. T. Wells 2000. Neuse Modeling and Monitoring (MODMON) technical report. Water Resources Research Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  24. Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  25. Manly, B. F. J. 1991. RT: A program for randomization testing, version 1.02. Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  26. Manly, B. F. J. 1994. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  27. Mashall, S. andM. Elliott. 1998. Environmental influences on the fish assemblages of the Humber estuary, U.K.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 46:175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCune, B. andM. J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, version 4. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.Google Scholar
  29. Mee, L. D. 1992. The Black Sea in crisis: A need for concerted international action.Ambio 21:278–286.Google Scholar
  30. Mueter, F. J. andB. L. Norcross. 1999. Linking assemblage structure of small demersal fishes around Kodiak Island, Alaska to environmental variables.marine Ecology Progress Series 190:37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Research Council. 2000. Clean coastal waters: Understanding and reduoing the effects of nutrient pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Nestlerode, J. A. andR. J. Diaz. 1998. Effects of periodic environmental hypoxia on predation of a tethered polchaete,Glycera americana: Implications for trophic dynamics.Marine Ecology Progress Series 172:185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nixon, S. W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns.Ophelia 41:199–220.Google Scholar
  34. Rorcross, B. L., B. A. Holladay andF. J. Mueter. 1995. Nursery area characteristics of pleuronectids in coastal Alaska, USA.Netherland Journal of Sea Research 34:161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norcross, B. L., F. J. Mueter andB. A. Holladay. 1997. Habitat models for juvenile pleuronectids around Kodiak Island, Alaska.Fisheries Bulletin 95:504–520.Google Scholar
  36. Paerl, H. W., J. W. Bales, L. W. Ausley, C. P. Buzzelli, L. B. Crowder, L. A. Eby, J. M. Fear, M. Go, B. L. Peierls, T. L. Richardson, andJ. S. Ramus. 2001. Ecosystem impacts of three sequential hurricanes (Dennis, Floyd, and Irene) on the United States’ largest lagoonal estuary, Pamlico Sound, NC.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98:5655–5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paerl, H. W., J. L. Pinckney, J. M. Fear, andB. L. Peierls. 1998. Ecosystem responses to internal and watershed organic matter loading: Consequences for hypoxia in the eutrophying Neuse River estuary, North Carolina, USA.Marine Ecology Progress Series 166:17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paine, R. T. andS. A. Levin. 1981. Intertidal landscapes: Disturbance and the dynamics of pattern.Ecological Monographs 51:145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pavela, J. S., J. L. Ross, andM. E. Chittenden, Jr. 1983. Sharp reductions in abundance of fishes and benthic macroinvertebrates in the Gulf of Mexico off Texas associated with hypoxia.Northeast Gulf Science 6:167–173.Google Scholar
  40. Peterson, C. H., H. C. Summerson, E. Thomson, H. S. Lenihan, J. Grabowski, L. Manning, F. Micheli, andG. Johnson. 2000. Synthesis of linkages between benthic and fish communities as a key to protecting essential fish habitat.Bulletin of Marine Science 66:759–774.Google Scholar
  41. Pickett, S. T. A. andP. S. White. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Pielou, E. C. 1984. The Interpretation of Ecological Data: A primer on Classification and Ordination. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Pihl, L. 1994. Changes in diet of demersal fish due to eutrophication-induced hypoxia in the Kattegat, Sweden.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pihl, L., S. P. Baden, andR. J. Diaz. 1991. Effects of periodic hypoxia on distribution of demersal fish and crustaceans.Marine Biology 108:349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pihl, L., S. P. Baden, R. J. Diaz, andL. C. Schaffner. 1992. Hypoxia-induced structural changes in the diet of bottomfeeding fish and crustacea.Marine Biology 112:349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Powers, S. P., D. E. Harper, Jr., andN. N. Rabalais. 2001. Effects of hypoxia/anoxia on the supply and settlement of invertebrate larvae, p. 185–210.In N. N. Rabalais and G. E. Turner (eds.) Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems. Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  47. Quinlan, J. A., B. O. Blanton, T. J. Miller, andF. E. Werner. 1999. From spawning grounds to the estuary: Using linked individual-based models and hydrodynamic models to interpret patterns and proceses in the oceanic phase of Atlantic menhadenBrevoortia tyramus life history.Fisheries Oceanography 8:224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Renaud, M. L. 1986. Hypoxia in Louisiana coastal waters during 1983: Implications for fisheries.Fishery Bulletin 84:19–26.Google Scholar
  49. Saila, S. B., J. E. McKenna, S. Formacion, G. T. Silvestre, andG. W. McManus. 1996. Empirical methods and models for multispecies stock assessment, p. 403–472In V. F. Gallucci, S. B. Saila, D. J. Gustafson, and B. J. Rothschild (eds.), Stock Assessment: Quantitative Methods and Applications for Small-Scale Fisheries. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  50. Selberg, C. D., L. A. Eby, andL. B. Crowder. 2001. Hypoxia in the Neuse River estuary: Responses of blue crabs and crabbers.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity.Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sousa, W. P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:353–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sullivan, E. T. andD. Gaskill. 1999. Effects of anoxia on the value of bottom habitat for Fisheries production in the Neuse River estuary. Final report for Fisheries Resource Grant 98 EP-04. Department of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City. North Carolina.Google Scholar
  54. Syms, C. andG. P. Jones. 1999. Scale of disturbance and the structure of a temperature fish guild.Ecology 80:921–940.Google Scholar
  55. Theil, R., A. Sepulveda, R. Kafemann, andW. Nellen. 1995. Environmental factors as forces structuring the fish assemblage of the Elbe estuary.Journal of Fish Biology 46:47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomson, E. E. 1998. Impacts of summer hypoxia on benthic fauna and implications for fisheries productivity in the Neuse River estuary, North Carolina. Master’s Thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  57. Tolmanzin, D. 1977. Hydrological and hydrochemical structure in the area of hypoxia and anoxia of the northwestern Black SeaBiological Morya 43.Google Scholar
  58. Venables, W. N. andB. D. Ripley. 1997. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS, 2nd edition. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology.Functional Ecology 3:385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nicholas School of the Environmental and Earth SciencesDuke University Marine LabBeaufort

Personalised recommendations