Our goal is to understand how removal regime and habitat type interact to influence removal success of a marine plant invader and the subsequent potential for restoration. In particular, we investigate the management program designed to eradicate the English cordgrass,Spartina anglica C. E. Hubbard, in marine intertidal habitats of Puget Sound, Washington, United States. Observational and manipulative experiments were used to measure the regrowth (vegetative growth), reinvasion (seedling recruitment), and restoration potential (return to native condition) of invaded habitats. Removal regime (consistent: yearly removal; interrupted: yearly removal with the last year missed) and habitat type (low salinity marsh, mudflat, cobble beach, and high salinity marsh sites) were considered. The response to removal regime was dramatic. Under consistent removal, cordgrass slowly declined but under interrupted removal, there was substantial regrowth of the invader. This pattern results from the resiliency of belowground biomass and the subsequent high aboveground productivity and seedling growth ofS. anglica. We also found that removal success depended on differences among sites that represent different habitat types. Cordgrass regrowth and reinvasion were substantially higher in the low salinity marsh sites where soils have lower salinity. We also found that at the low salinity marsh sites, some restoration of native plants and soil conditions was evident. At mudflat, cobble beach, and high salinity marsh sites, colonization of native vascular plants and algae not normally present, in the absence of the invasion, occurred. Whether these habitats will eventually revert back to the pre-invasion conditions over a longer period of time is unknown.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bertness, M. 1991. Zonation ofSpartina patens andSpartina alterniflora in a New England salt marsh.Ecology 72:138–148.
Crooks, J. 2002. Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: The role of ecosystem engineers.Oikos 97:153–166.
Daehler, C. C. andD. R. Strong. 1996. Status, prediction and prevention of introduced cordgrass,Spartina spp. invasions in Pacific estuaries, USA.Biological Conservation 78:51–58.
Goss-Custard, J. D. andM. E. Moser. 1988. Rates of change in the numbers of Dunlin,Calidris alpina, wintering in British estuaries in relation to the spread ofSpartina anglica.Journal of Applied Ecology 25:95–109.
Hacker, S. D., D. Heimer, C. E. Hellquist, T. G. Reeder, B. Reeves, T. Riordan, andM. N. Dethier. 2001. A marine plant (Spartina anglica) invades widely varying habitats: Potential mechanisms of invasion and control.Biological Invasions 3: 211–217.
Hobbs, R. J. andS. E. Humphries. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions.Conservation Biology 9:761–770.
Jones, C. G., J. H. Lawton, andM. Shachak. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers.Oikos 689:373–386.
Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, andR. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control.Ecological Applications 10:689–710.
Maricle, B. R. andR. W. Lee. 2002. Aerenchyma development and oxygen transport in the estuarine cordgrassesSpartina alterniflora andS. anglica.Aquatic Botany 74:109–120.
Myers, J. H., D. Simberloff, A. M. Kuris, andJ. R. Carey. 2000. Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:316–320.
Naylor, R. L. 2000. The economics of alien species invasions, p. 241–259.In H. A. Mooney and R. J. Hobbs (eds.). Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Parker, I. M., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, K. Goodell, M. Wonham, P. M. Kareiva, M. H. Williamson, B. Von Holle, P. B. Moyle, J. E. Byers, andL. Goldwasser. 1999. Impacts: Toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders.Biological Invasions 1:3–19.
Ranwell, D. S. 1967. World resources ofSpartina townsendii and economic use ofSpartina marshlands.Journal of Applied Ecology 4:239–256.
Rejmanek, M. andM. J. Pitcairn. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal, p. 249–253.In C. R. Veitch and M. N. Clout (eds.). Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K.
Scott, R., T. V. Callaghan, and G. J. Lawson. 1990.Spartina as a biofuel, p. 48–51.In A. J. Gray and R. E. M. Benham (eds.),Spartina anglica—A Research Review. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology No. 2, London, U.K.
Simberloff, D. 1997. Eradication, p. 221–228.In D. Simberloff, D. C. Schmitz, and T. C. Brown (eds.), Strangers in Paradise—Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Taylor, M. C. andE. M. Burrows. 1968. Studies of the biology ofSpartina in the Dee estuary, Cheshire.Journal of Ecology 56: 795–809.
Thompson, J. D. 1991. The biology of an invasive plant: What makesSpartina anglica so successful?BioScience 41:393–401.
Zavaleta, E. S., R. J. Hobbs, andH. A. Mooney. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:454–459.
Sources of Unpublished Materials
Dethier, M. N. and S. D. Hacker. Unpublished Data. University of Washington, Department of Biology and Friday Harbor Laboratories, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, Washington 98250.
Hacker, S. D. and M. N. Dethier. Unpublished data.
About this article
Cite this article
Reeder, T.G., Hacker, S.D. Factors contributing to the removal of a marine grass invader (Spartina anglica) and subsequent potential for habitat restoration. Estuaries 27, 244–252 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803381
- Habitat Type
- Belowground Biomass
- Tiller Number
- Soil Redox Potential
- Removal Plot