Skip to main content
Log in

Number and weight of seeds and reproductive strategies of herbaceous plants

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper brings data set of seed reproduction of about 500 wild herbaceous species of Central Europe and presents a number of produced seeds in a new way. Number of seeds — reproductive capacity of a population (RCP) was defined as a number of seeds produced by one species per 1 m2 at its one-hundred-per-cent cover per one season. About 23% of seed weight variability and about 26% of variability in RCP were explainable on a family level. The trade-off between RCP and seed weight was confirmed both within families and also among families. Both characteristics had higher variability on a family level and on lower taxonomic levels than on subclass and class levels. Species with an annual life cycle have a larger number of seeds than perennials. Geophytes and species without lateral spread have a tendency to produce a large amount of relatively weighty seeds in comparison to other life forms, and to species with vegetative lateral spread. Species with seeds dispersed by wind usually have a large number of lightweight seeds. Multivariate analyses confirmed some tendencies of reproductive traits which correspond to the definition of C-, S-, R- strategies by Grime — “verification” of the RCP as ecological trait. The R- strategy was well distinguished from the C- and S- strategies by reproductive traits, whereas C- and S- strategies are very similar to each other. Species with insect pollination agent often correspond to C- strategy, wind agent to S- strategy, and species with self-pollination to R- strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Årgen J. &Willson M.F. (1992): Determination of seed production inGeranium maculatum.Oecologia 92: 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Årgen J. &Willson M.F. (1994): Cost of seed production in the herbsGeranium maculatum andG. sylvaticum: an experimental field study.Oikos 70: 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker H.G. (1972): Seed weight in relation to environmental conditions in California.Ecology 53: 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M., Harper J.L. &Townsend C.R. (1990):Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd M., Silvertown J. &Tucker C. (1990): Population ecology of heterostyle and homostylePrimula vulgaris: growth, survival and reproduction in field populations.J. Ecol. 78: 799–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H. (1985): The evolutionary demography of clonal reproduction. In:Jackson J.B.C., Buss L.W. &Cook R.E. (eds.),Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 187–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavers P.B. &Steele M.G. (1984): Patterns of change in seed weight over time on individual plants.Amer. Naturalist 124: 324–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colosi J.C. &Cavers P.B. (1984): Pollination affects percent biomass allocated to reproduction inSilene vulgaris (bladder champion).Amer. Naturalist 124: 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dostál J. (1989):Nová květena ČSSR 1, 2 (New flora of the CSSR). Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs C. &McQuilkin W.E. (1944): Seed production of Southern Appalachian oaks.J. Forest. 42: 786–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. (1997): Clonal life histories and evolution of seed recruitment. In:de Kroon H. &van Groenendael J. (eds.),The ecology and evolution of clonal plants, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M. (1985):Seed ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank D. &Klotz S. (1988):Biologisch-ökologische Daten zur Flora der DDR, MLU, Halle-Wittenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankland B. (1975): Phytochrome control of seed germination in relation to the light environment. In:Smith H. (ed.),Light and plant development, Butterworth, London, pp. 477–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C. &Stanton M.L. (1991): Consequences of emergence phenology for reproductive success inRanunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 78: 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. (1977): Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory.Amer. Naturalist 111: 1169–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. (2001):Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. &Hunt R. (1987):Comparative plant ecology. A functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J.L. (1977):Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J.L., Lovell P.H. &Moore K.G. (1970): The shapes and sizes of seeds.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix S.D. (1984): Variation in seed weight and its effects on germination inPastinaca sativa L. (Umbeliferae).Amer. J. Bot. 71: 795–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejný S. &Slavík B. (eds.) (1988):Květena České socialistické republiky (Flora of the Czech Republic) 1. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejný S. &Slavík B. (eds.) (1990):Květena České republiky (Flora of the Czech Republic) 2. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejný S. &Slavík B. (eds.) (1992):Květena České republiky (Flora of the Czech Republic) 3. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry G.A.F. &Grime J.P. (eds.) (1993):Methods in comparative plant ecology. A laboratory manual. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordano P. (1995): Frugivore-mediated selection on fruit and seed size: birds and St. Lucieff’s cherry,Prunus mahaleb.Ecology 76: 2627–2639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd W.S., Campbell Ch.S., Kellog E.A. &Stevens P.F. (1999):Plant systematics — a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano S. (1981): Trade-off relationships between some reproductive characteristics in plants with spetial reference to life history strategy.Bot. Mag. Tokyo 94: 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L. &Klimešová J. (1999a): CLO-PLA2 — a database of clonal plants in central Europe.Pl. Ecol. 141: 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L. & Klimešová J. (1999b):Database of clonal plants. http://www.butbn.cas.cz/klimes (March 2002).

  • Kubát K. et al. (eds.) (2002):Klíč ke květeně České republiky (Key to the flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde R.G. &Roitberg B.D. (1989): Resource limitation and offspring size and number trade-offs inCirsium arvense (Asteraceae).Amer. J. Bot. 76: 1107–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D.G. (1987): Selection of offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies.Amer. Naturalist 129: 800–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord J., Westoby M. &Leishman M.R. (1995): Seed size and phylogeny in six temperate floras: constraints, niche conservatism and adaptation.Amer. Naturalist 146: 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett Doust J. (1980): A comparative study of life history and resource allocation in selectedUmbelliferae.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13: 189–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marhold K. &Hindák F. (eds.) (1998):Zoznam nižších a vyšších rastlín Slovenska (Checklist of non-vascular plants of Slovakia). Veda, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer S.J. (1989): Ecological, taxonomic and life history correlates of seed mass among Indiana dune angiosperms.Ecol. Monogr. 59: 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogie M. &Hutchings M.J. (1990): Phylogeny, ontogeny and clonal growth in vascular plants. In:Groenendael J. &de Kroon H. (eds.),Clonal growth in plants, SPB Academic Publishing, Hague, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat H.J. &Fitter A.H. (1994): Comparative analysis of ecological characteristics of British angiosperms.Biol. Rev. 69: 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijl L. (1982):Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Berlin Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor H.C. &Harder L.D. (1994): Pollen load, capsule weight, and seed production in three orchid species.Canad. J. Bot. 72: 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner S.S. &Ricklefs R.E. (1995): Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants.Amer. J. Bot. 82: 596–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaler W., Jäger E., Schubert R. &Werner K. (1987):Exkursionsflora für die Gebiete der DDR und der BRD. Atlas der Gefäßpflanzen. Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury E.J. (1942):The reproductive capacity per plants. Bell and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J.W. (1981): Seed size, lifespan and germination date as co-adapted features of plant life history.Amer. Naturalist 118: 860–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J.W. &Lovett Doust J.L. (1993):Introduction to plant population biology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavík B. (ed.) (1995):Květena České republiky (Flora of the Czech Republic) 4. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavík B. (ed.) (1997):Květena České republiky (Flora of the Czech Republic) 5. Academic, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Ch.C. &Fretwell S.D. (1974): The optimal balance between size and number of offspring.Amer. Naturalist 108: 499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood T.R.E. (1988): Tactics, strategies and templets.Oikos 52:3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton M.L. (1984): Developmental and genetic sources of seed weight variation inRaphanus raphanistrum L. (Brassicaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 71: 1090–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistica (1999):STATISTICA for Windows (Volume I). General conventions & statistics I (2nd Ed.). StatSoft, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S. &Vickery R.K. (1988): Trade-offs between sexual and asexual reproduction in the genusMimulus.Oecologia 76: 330–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.F.J. &Šmilauer P. (1998):CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for canonical community ordination. Microcomputer power, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J.N. (1984): Variation among individual seed masses inLomatium grayi (Umbelliferae) under controlled conditions: magnitude and partitioning of variance.Ecology 65: 626–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller D.M. (1982): Factors influencing seed weight inImpatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 69: 1470–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw I.F. &Dunstone R.L. (1984): Effect of temperature on seed development in jujube (Simmondsia chinensis (Link)Schneider). 1. Dry matter changes.Austral. J. Agric. Res. 35: 685–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M., Leischman M. &Janice L. (1996): Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal.Philos. Trans. Ser. B 351: 1309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff R.D. (1986): Seed size variation inDesmodium paniculatum. I. Factors affecting seed size.J. Ecol. 74: 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Božena Šerá.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Šerá, B., Šerý, M. Number and weight of seeds and reproductive strategies of herbaceous plants. Folia Geobot 39, 27–40 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803262

Keywords

Nomenclature

Electronic appendix (www.ibot.cas.cz/folia)

Navigation