Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 263–271 | Cite as

BIOPOP — A database of plant traits and internet application for nature conservation

  • Peter Poschlod
  • Michael Kleyer
  • Anne-Kathrin Jackel
  • Andrea Dannemann
  • O. Tackenberg
Article

Abstract

In scientific literature there is a wealth of information about the ecological and life-history traits of plant species. This information would be very valuable for a functional analysis of the response of species and communities to environmental changes and subsequent vulnerability/viability analysis or predictive modelling. However, the information is scattered in a multiple of different sources. Researchers often are discouraged from searching all available information.

We are compiling a database of plant traits of the flora of Germany. Our aim is to create a comprehensive, well documented database to be made freely accessible within FLORAWEB, an Internet portal of the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN). An interactive user-interface will enable the data to be readily used for extracting biological risk factors and for decision-making in nature conservation.

A further aim of the project is to develop an application to enable simple predictions of plant population responses to habitat conservation or restoration management.

Keywords

Plant conservation Plant functional types Plant management Plant vulnerability analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakker J.P., Bekker R.M. &Thompson K. (2000): From a seed bank database towards a seed database.Z. Ökol. Naturschutz 9: 61–72.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker J.P., Poschlod P., Strykstra R.J., Bekker R.M. &Thompson K. (1996): Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology.Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 461–490.Google Scholar
  3. Belde M. (2001): Sukzessionsmodelle für die Prognose von Entwicklungsszenarien. In:Kratz R. &Pfadenhauer J. (eds.),Ökosystemmanagement für Niedermoore, Strategien und Verfahren zur Renaturierung, Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp. 201–209.Google Scholar
  4. Bonn S. &Poschlod P. (1998):Ausbreitungsbiologie der Pflanzen Mitteleuropas. Grundlagen und kulturhistorische Aspekte. Quelle & Meyer, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  5. British Ecological Society (1941): Biological Flora of the British Isles.J. Ecol. 29: 356–357.Google Scholar
  6. Cavers P.B. &Mulligan G.A. (1972): A new series — The biology of Canadian weeds.Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 52: 651–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clapham A.R., Coombe D.E., Pigott C.D. &Richards P.W. (1958): The Biological Flora of the British Isles.J. Ecol. 46: 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cousens R. &Mortimer M. (1995):Dynamics of weed populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Diaz S. &Marcelo C. (1997): Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change.J. Veg. Sci. 8: 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diaz S., Marcelo C. &Casanoves F. (1998): Plant functional traits and environmental filters at regional scale.J. Veg. Sci. 9: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksson O. &Jakobsson A. (1998): Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species.J. Ecol. 86: 922–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer M. &Stöcklin J. (1997): Local extinctions of plants in remnants of extensively used calcareous grasslands.Conservation Biol. 11: 727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitter A.H. &Peat H.J. (1994) The ecological flora database.J. Ecol. 82: 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank D. &Klotz S. (1990): Biologisch-ökologische Daten zur Flora der DDR. Ed. 2.Wiss. Beitr. Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenberg 32 (P 41): 1–167.Google Scholar
  15. Gatsuk L. (1980): Age states of plants of various growth forms: a review.J. Ecol. 68: 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gigon A., Langenauer R., Meier C., Nievergelt B. (1998): Blaue Listen der erfolgreich erhaltenen oder geförderten Tier- und Pflanzenarten der Roten Listen — Methodik und Anwendung in der nördlichen Schweiz.Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich 129: 1–137 + 180 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Gitay H. &Noble I.R. (1997): What are functional types and how should we seek them? Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties. In:Smith T. M., Shugart H.H. &Woodward F. I. (eds.),Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  18. Gregor T &Mazke-Hajek G. (2002): Apomikten in Roten Listen: Kann der Naturschutz einen Großteil der Pflanzenarten übergehen?Natur & Landschaft 77(2): 64–71.Google Scholar
  19. Grime J. P., Hodgson J. G. &Hunt R. (1988):Comparative plant ecology — a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  20. Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G., Hunt R., Thompson K., Hendry G.A.F., Campbell B.D., Jalili A., Hillier H., Diaz S. &Burke M.J.W. (1997): Functional types: testing the concept in Northern England. In:Smith T.M., Shugart H.H. &Woodward F.I. (eds.),Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 122–152.Google Scholar
  21. Hegi G. (1998).Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa 1/3. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  22. Hodgson J.D., Grime J.P., Hunt R. &Thompson K. (1995):The electronic comparative plant ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  23. Hurka H. &Neuffer B. (1997): Evolutionary processes in the genusCapsella (Brassicaceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jakobsson A. &Eriksson O. (2000): A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants.Oikos 88: 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahmen S., Poschlod P. &Schreiber K.F. (2002): Conservation management of calcareous grasslands. Changes in plant species composition and response of functional traits during 25 years.Biol. Conservation 104: 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kästner A., Jäger E.J. &Schubert R. (2001):Handbuch der Segetalpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Springer Verlag, Wien, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kirchner O., Loew E. &Schroeter C. (1908–1936):Lebensgeschichte der Blütenpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  28. Kleyer M. (1995): Biological traits of vascular plants. A database.Arbeitsber. Inst. Landschaftsplanung Ökol., Univ. Stuttgart, N.F. 2: 1–23 (with floppy disk).Google Scholar
  29. Kleyer M. (1999a): Anwendung von Datenbanken für die Bewertung von Eingriffen in die Vegetation. In:Amler K., Bahl A., Henle K., Kaule G., Poschlod P. &Settele J. (eds.),Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis, Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp. 188–191.Google Scholar
  30. Kleyer M. (1999b): Distribution of plant functional types along gradients of disturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape.J. Veg. Sci. 10: 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleyer M. (2002): Validation of functional types across two contrasting landscapes.J. Veg. Sci. 13: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klimeš L. &Klimešová J. (1999): CLO-PLA2 — A database of clonal plants in central Europe.Pl. Ecol. 141: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klotz S., Kühn I. & Durka W. (2002): BIOLFLOR — Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland.Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38: 334 S.Google Scholar
  34. Knuth R. (1898):Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  35. Korneck D., Schnittler M., Klingenstein F., Gerhard L., Takla M., Bohn U. &May R. (1998): Warum verarmt unsere Flora? Auswertung der Roten Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands.Schriftenreihe Vegetationsk. 29: 299–359.Google Scholar
  36. Lavorel S, McIntyre S., Landsberg J. &Forbes T.D.A. (1997): Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance.Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 474–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matthies D. &Poschlod P. (2000): The biological flora of Central Europe — aims and concept.Flora 195: 116–122.Google Scholar
  38. Moog D., Poschlod P., Kahmen S. &Schreiber K.F. (2002): Comparison of species composition between different grassland management treatments after 25 years.Appl. Veg. Sci. 5: 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poschlod P. (1999): Einbindung populationsbiologischer Merkmale von Pflanzen in die Planung von Maßnahmen am Beispiel des Managements von Teichen im Altdorfer Wald (Oberschwaben) und Ausgleichsmaßnahmen in der Elbaue (Sachsen-Anhalt). In:Amler K., Bahl A., Henle K., Kaule G., Poschlod P. &Settele J. (eds.),Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis, Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp. 238–241.Google Scholar
  40. Poschlod P. &Bonn S. (1998): Changing dispersal processes on the central European landscape since the last ice age — an explanation for the actual decrease of plant species richness in different habitats?Acta Bot. Neerl. 47: 27–44.Google Scholar
  41. Psochlod P, Kiefer S., Tränkle U., Fischer S. &Bonn S. (1998): Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time.Appl. Veg. Sci. 1: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poschlod P., Kleyer M. &Tackenberg O. (2000): Biological risk assessment and vulnerability analysis in plants.Z. Ökol. Naturschutz 9 (1–2): 1–128.Google Scholar
  43. Poschlod P., Matthies D., Jordan S. &Mengel C. (1996): The biological flora of Central Europe — an ecological bibliography.Bull. Geobot. Inst. ETH 62: 89–108.Google Scholar
  44. Rabotnov T.A. (1974–1990):Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (Biological flora of the Moscow region). 1 (1974), 2 (1975), 3 (1976), 4 (1978), 5 (1980), 6 (1980), 7 (1983), 8 (1990). Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, Moskva.Google Scholar
  45. Rabotnov T.I. (1986a): Bibliography of papers on the problems of coenopopulations in the U.S.S.R. I.Excerpta Bot. B 20(2): 71–96.Google Scholar
  46. Rabotnov T.I. (1986b): Bibliography of papers on the problems of coenopopulations in the U.S.S.R. II.Excerpta Bot. B 20(3): 171–206.Google Scholar
  47. Rabotnov T.I. (1987): Bibliography of papers on the problems of coenopopulations in the U.S.S.R. III.Excerpta Bot. B 21(2): 91–119.Google Scholar
  48. Salisbury E.J. (1942):The reproductive capacity of plants. G. Bell and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  49. Schmid B. &Matthies D. (1994): Seltenheit und Gefährdung — Populationsbiologische Grundlagen des Artenschutzes.Naturwissenschaften 81: 283–292.Google Scholar
  50. Serebryakova T.I. (1971):Morfogenez pobegov i evolyutsiya zhiznennykh form zlakov (Tiller morphogenesis and life form evolution of grasses). Moskva, Nauka.Google Scholar
  51. Stöcklin J. &Fischer M. (1999): Plants with longer-lived seeds have lower local extinction rates in grassland remnants 1950–1985.Oecologia 120: 539–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tackenberg O. (2001): Methoden zur Bewertung gradueller Unterschiede des Ausbreitungspotentials von Pflanzenarten. Dissertationes Botanicae, Berlin, Cramer.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson K., Bakker J. P. &Bekker R. M. (1997):The soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  54. Weiher E.A., Van der Werf A., Thompson K., Roderick M., Garnier E. &Eriksson O. (1999): Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology.J. Veg. Sci. 10: 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wisskirchen R. &Haeupler H. (1998):Standardliste der Farn-und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Poschlod
    • 1
  • Michael Kleyer
    • 2
  • Anne-Kathrin Jackel
    • 1
  • Andrea Dannemann
    • 2
  • O. Tackenberg
  1. 1.Institute of BotanyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Landscape Ecology Group (FB 7)Carl von Ossietzky University of OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations