Skip to main content
Log in

Latin America’s think tanks: The roots of nonprofit privatization

  • Development Theory
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional development models refer to two sectors, public and for-profit private. Massive growth of nonprofit private activity undermines that picture. Latin American tyink tanks exemplify a nonprofit privatization that has an enormous impact on development and remolds inter-sectoral relationships overall.

Four major dynamics account for the spectacular growth of the region’s nonprofit think tanks. Three push factors are state repression, state weakness, and public university problems, and, as epitomized by financial supply, a pull factor is also crucial to attract nonprofit growth.

To conceptualize its findings, this article considers public failure theory. Unhelpful regarding the pull factor, the theory otherwise works reasonably well, especially where there is visible movement from the public to the nonprofit sector. Beyond that, the evidence suggests ways to broaden the theory. Even a broadened formulation cannot fully capture the remarkable diversity and vitality of the growth in Latin America’s think tanks. But we are able to identify and analyze the key growth factors that blend together to produce particular institutional and national configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANHEIER, HELMUT and WOLFGANG SEIBEL 1990a The third sector in comparative perspective: Four propositions. In Anheier and Seibel, eds., 379–87.

  • 1990bThe third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSALDI, WALDO and FERNANDO CALDERÓN 1989 La búsqueda de América Latina: Entre el ansia de encontrarla y el temor de no reconocerla. Paper delivered at the Conference on International Academic Relations and Institutional Development of the Social Science in Latin America. Montevideo: August 17–19.

  • BADELT, CHRISTOPHER 1990 Institutional choice and the nonprofit sector. In Anheier and Seibel, eds., 53–64.

  • BALÁN, JORGE 1990 the state of graduate social sciences in Latin America and the role of independent research centers. Presentation to the Ford Foundation meeting on Higher Education in Latin America, Nov. 16.

  • BRAÑES, RAÚL 1991Institutional and legal aspects of the environment in Latin America including the participation of nongovernmental organizations in environmental management. Washington, D.C.: IDB.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNNER, JOSÉ JOAQUÍN and ALICIA BARRIOS 1987Inquisición, mercado y filantropía: Ciencias sociales y autoritarismo en Argentina, Brasil, Chile y Uruguay. Santiago: FLASCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALDERÓN, FERNANDO and PATRICIA PROVOSTE 1989 La construcción de las ciencias sociales en América Latina.David y Goliath 43, 5: 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 La construcción institucional de las ciencias sociales en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, THOMAS 1992Intermediary NGOs: The supporting link in grassroots development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLACSO 1991 Autonomía y estabilidad: Los desafíos de las ciencias, sociales en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, DAVID 1991 New perspectives on the comparative method. InComparative political dynamics, edited by Dankwart Rustow and Kenneth Erickson. 7–31. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979The new authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DATTA, BHABATOSH 1989 Social science research: Universities and autonomous institutions. InHigher education in India, edited by Amrik Sigh and G.D. Sharma, 78–88.

  • EL DIARIO 1992 Los ONGs y su papel. Lima: Feb. 12.

  • DÍAZ-ALBERTINI, JAVIER 1990 Development as grassroots empowerment: An analytical review of NGDO programs in Lima, Peru. Working paper #157 of the Program on Non-Profit Organizations. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • DICKSON, PAUL 1971Think tanks. New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMAGGIO, PAUL and HELMUT ANHEIER 1990 The Sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors.Annual Review of Sociology 16: 137–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOUGLAS, JAMES 1987 Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, ed., 43–54.

  • EVANS, PETER, DIETRICH RUESCHEMEYER, and THEDA SKOCPOL 1985a Towards a more adequate understanding of the state. In Evans, Rueschemeyer, and Skocpol, 347–66.

  • EVANS, PETER, DIETRICH RUESCHEMEYER, and THEDA SKOCPOL eds. 1985bBringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRUHLING, HUGO 1985 Nonprofit organizations as opposition to authoritarian rule: The case of human rights organizations and private research centers in Chile. Working paper #96 of the Program on Non-Profit Organizations. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLADE, WILLIAM, ed 1986State shrinking: A comparative inquiry into privatization. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991Privatization of public enterprises in Latin America. San Diego: U.S.-Mexico Center, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • HANSMANN, HENRY 1986 The role of nonprofit enterprise. In Rose-Ackerman, ed., 57–84.

  • HEATH, JOHN, ed 1990Public enterprises at the crossroads, London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIGHLEY, JOHN and RICHARD GUNTHER, eds. 1992Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and southern Europe Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSTITUTE OF POLITICAL STUDIES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (IEPRI) 1990 Memories 1986–1989. Bogotá, Colombia: National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, ESTELLE, ed. 1989The nonprofit sector in international perspective, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JANICKE, MARTIN 1990State failure: The impotence of politics in industrial society. Translated by, Alan Braley. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVY, DANIEL 1981 Comparing authoritarian regimes in Latin America: Insights from higher education policy.Comparative Politics 14, 1: 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1986Higher education and the state in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVY, DANIEL 1986, Forthcoming. Outside the university: Mexico’s private research centers in comparative perspective. InCycles and trends in Mexican university education, edited by David E. Lorey. UCLA Latin American Center Publications.

  • LINZ, JUAN 1975 Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. InHandbook of Political Science, vol. III, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 175–411. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • LLADSER, MARÍA TERESA 1987Directorio de investigadores. Santiago: AHC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCARTHY, KATHLEEN, VIRGINIA HODGINSON, ROSEY SUMARIWALLA, and ASSOCIATES, eds. 1992 The nonprofit sector in the global community: Voices from many nations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOLLER, MÓNICA and ANA MARÍA FLORES 1985 Fundaciones norteamericanas en América Latina y el Caríbe: Educación superior, prioridades y tendencias (1972–1980): El caso de la Fundación Ford. Licenciatura thesis at the UAG. Guadalajara.

  • MOMMSEN, WOLFGANG 1987 The academic profession in the Federal Republic of Germany. InThe Academic Profession, edited by Burton Clark, 60–93. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, PHILIPPE SCHMITTER, and LAURENCE WHITEHEAD, eds. 1986Transitions from authoritarian rule: Prospects for democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’NEILL, MICHAEL 1989The third America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORELLANA RODRÍGUEZ, MARIO 1986 Reflexiones sobres las ciencias sociales y del comportamiento. InConocimiento, educación superior y desarrollo nacional, edited by CPU, 223–38, Santiago: CPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORLANS, HAROLD 1972The nonprofit research institute. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • POWELL, WALTER W., ed. 1987The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RODRIGUES, LEÔNCIO MARTINS 1982 Ciencias sociais, universidade e intelectuais no Brasil Paper presented at the FLACSO-Chile conference on Intelectuales, Universidad y Sociedad. Mimeo. Santiago.

  • ROSE-ACKERMAN, SUSAN, ed. 1986The economics of nonprofit institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SALAMON, LESTER 1987 Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In Powell, ed., 99–117.

  • SALAMON, LESTER 1990 The nonprofit sector and government: The American experience in theory and practice. In Anheier and Seibel, eds., 219–40.

  • SCHAMIS, HÉCTOR 1991 Reconceptualizing Latin American authoritarianism in the 1970s: From bureaucratic authoritarianism to neoconservatism.Comparative Politics 23, 2: 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZMAN, SIMON 1984 Higher education and scientific research: A view from Latin America InPerspectives in Higher Education, edited by Burton Clark, 199–232. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIBEL, WOLFGANG and HELMUT ANHEIER 1990 Sociological and political science approaches to the third sector. In Anheier and Seibel, eds., 7–20.

  • SMITH, BRIAN 1990More than altruism: The politics, of private foreign aid: Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, JAMES 1991Idea brokers: Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, MICHAEL 1992Entre dos fuegos: ONG, desarrollo rural y violence politica. Lima: IEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPALDING, HOBART 1991 Peru, a country in crisis: A report on the social sciences and social science research centers. Report to SAREC. Mimeo.

  • SPALDING, HOBART, BARBARA STALLINGS, JOHN WEEKS 1990An evaluation of SAREC’s Latin America programme. Stockholm: SAREC.

    Google Scholar 

  • TPALDING, HOBART, LANCE TAYLOR, CARLOS VILAS 1985SAREC’s Latin American Programme (LAP): An Evaluation. Stockholm: SAREC.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, ANDRES 1992 Democracy and development: The role of nongovernmental organizations in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. In McCarthy et al.: 389–405.

  • VEGA, JOSÉ LUIS 1989 Pauta del desarrollo de las ciencias sociales en centroamérica. Paper presented for the Social Science Research Council.

  • WEBB, RICHARD 1991 Prologue. InPeru’s recovery plan, edited by Carlos Paredes and Jeffrey Sachs. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEISBROD, BURTON 1988The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Daniel C. Levy is a professor at SUNY-Albany. After earning his Ph.D. in political science at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, he was research associate for five years at Yale University. He has published five books and roughly seventy articles on politics and higher education, especially on Latin America, and on Mexican politics. Levy has done field research in most Latin American countries and has presented lectures and been published on five continents.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, D.C. Latin America’s think tanks: The roots of nonprofit privatization. St Comp Int Dev 30, 3–25 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802951

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802951

Keywords

Navigation