Abstract
The central question in preserving the rights of future generations is how to ground a theory of rights that is also acceptable to the present generation, including staunch Republicans, without self-contradiction. Such a theory of rights consists of the three principles of a minimalist liberatarian theory (that of Robert Nozick), and demonstrates that environmental degradation is a violation of this theory of rights; a theory that is compatible with a free enterprise corporate culture. It is shown that no appeal to liberalism is necessary. It is shown that the case is not based on some ideals of justice but on three politically conservative principles that all modern societies accept as being fundamental to the continuation of those societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Airaksinen, T. (1988). “Original Populations and Environmental Rights.”Journal of Applied Philosophy, 5 I: 37–47.
Barry, B. (1989).Theories of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Elliot, R. (1981). “Rawlsian Justice and Non-Human Animals.”Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1: 95–106.
Epstein, R. A. (1992). “Justice Across the Generations.” P. Laslett and J. S. Fishkin, eds.Justice Between Age Groups and Generations. New Haven: Yale University Press. 84–106.
Hare, R. M. (1987). “Moral Reasoning about the Environment.”Journal of Applied Philosophy, 4: 3–14.
Kohler, W. R. (1986). “Is Man Morally Obliged not to Destroy Nature?”Ratio, 28: 20–35.
Laslett, P., and J. S. Fishkin, eds. (1992).Justice Between Age Groups and Generations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Locke, John. (1898). Peter Laslett, ed.Two Treatises on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerisity Press.
Manning, R. (1981). “Environmental Ethics and Rawls' Theory of Justice.”Environmental Ethics, 3: 155–166.
Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Polanyi, Karl. (1963). “Aristotle Discovers the Economy.” George Dalton, ed.Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies: Essays of Karl Polanyi. Garden City: Anchor Books. 78–115.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice. Cambridge; The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.
— (1993).Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Regan, T. (1981). “Duties to Animals: Rawls' Dilemma”,Ethics and Animals, 2: 76–81.
Sen, A. K. (1970).Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, Calif.: Holden-Day Inc.
Singer, B. A. (1988). “An Extension of Rawls' Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics.”Environmental Ethics, 10: 217–232.
Van de Veer, D. (1979). “Of Beasts, Persons and the Original Position.”The Monist, 62: 368–377.
Weitzman, M. L. (1995). “On the ‘Environmental’ Discount Rate.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, 26, 2: 200–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Earlier versions of this paper were presented at Cornell University and at Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin. I would like to thank Dr Udo E. Simonis for his helpful comments, but I alone am responsible for any remaining errors. This research is financed by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, grant#410-94-1221.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dore, M. A libertarian theory of rights and future generations. FSSE 27, 23–35 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802867
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802867