Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of progressive interactivity on learning from interactive video

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 September 1986

Abstract

The effects of systematically varied interactivity on learning from interactive video were studied. A total of 98 high-school students served as subjects. Four increasingly interactive versions of instruction were used. After receiving the instruction, students took a 23-item recall test. Recall was significantly affected by the amount and type of interactivity provided. The fully interactive version yielded the greatest recall but took longer to complete than any of the other presentations. Time to complete the instruction was shortest, and the resulting rate of learning was greatest, for the simple linear video presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. R., & Lorch, E. P. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction? In J. Bryant and D. R. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, S. L., Huston, A. C., Watkins, B. A., & Wright, J. C. (1982). The effects of selective attention to television forms on children's comprehension of content.Child Development, 53, 601–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBloois, M.L. (1982). Principles for designing interactive videodisc instructional materials. In M. L. DeBloois (Ed.),Videodisc/microcomputer courseware design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Norton, S., Taylor, S., Webb, M., & Dusseldorp, R. (1975). How effective is CAI?Educational Leadership, 33, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. (1982). Thinking interactively. In S. Floyd & B. Floyd (Eds.),Handbook of interactive video. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garhart, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (1985, March).Interactive video as an instructional medium: A look at related research. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Philadelphia.

  • Gilman, D. A. (1969). Comparison of several feedback methods for correcting errors by computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 503–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag, R. E. (1984). The mental effort requirement of cumulative rehearsal: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J. (1985). Empirical issues in the study of interactive video.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33, 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., & Garhart, C. (1985, March)Research methods for the study of interactive video. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Philadelphia.

  • Hannafin, M J., Garhart, C., Rieber, L. P., & Phillips, T. L. (1985). Keeping interactive video in perspective: Tentative guidelines and cautions in the design of interactive video. In E. Miller (Ed.),Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Denver, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching.Review of Educational Research, 50, 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, H. (1977).Television and the preschool child. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, E. P., Anderson, D. R., & Levin, S. R. (1979). The relationship of visual attention to children's comprehension of television.Child Development, 50, 722–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, R. (1983). It's becoming an interactive world.Educational and Industrial Television, 15(6), 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1981). Introducing AIME: The assessment of children's mental involvement with television. In H. Gardner & H. Kelly (Eds.),Children and the worlds of television. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1983). Television watching and mental effort: A social psychological view. In J. Bryant & D. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D. (1981). Use of adaptive information for advisement in learning concepts and rules using computer-assisted instruction.American Educational Research Journal, 18, 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooley, R. D. (1982). Training applications: Making interactive video technology work effectively. In M. L. DeBloois (Eds.),Videodisc/microcomputer courseware design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02768426.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaffer, L.C., Hannafin, M.J. The effects of progressive interactivity on learning from interactive video. ECTJ 34, 89–96 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802581

Keywords

Navigation