Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1046–1061 | Cite as

How hurricane attributes determine the extent of environmental effects: Multiple hurricanes and different coastal systems

  • Michael A. MallinEmail author
  • Catherine A. Corbett


The most recent spate of hurricanes to strike the United States and Caribbean (1989 to the present) has occurred when many of the affected areas had long-term water quality and biological data collection efforts ongoing, as well as special follow-up studies. These data have allowed researchers to obtain a much clearer picture of how individual characteristics of hurricanes interact with human land use to lead to various types and degrees of environmental effects. Common deleterious water quality effects associated with hurricanes include excessive nutrient loading, algal blooms, elevated biochemical oxygen demand and subsequent hypoxia and anoxia, fish and invertebrate kills, aquatic animal displacements, large scale releases of chemical pollutants and debris from damaged human structures, exacerbated spread of exotic species and pathogens, and pollution of water with fecal microbial pathogens. These and other effects may or may not occur, or occur to varying degrees, depending upon individual hurricane characteristics including category, point of landfall, wind speed, amount of rainfall, and path after landfall. Landfall in a populous area, a post-landfall trajectory upriver toward a headwater region, passage along a floodplain containing pollution sources (such as wastewater treatment plants, concentrated animal feeding operations, and septic systems), and intensity sufficient to damage power generation will all lead to increased environmental damage. We suggest a number of recommendations for post-hurricane water sampling parameters and techniques, and provide several management-oriented recommendations for better coastal and floodplain land use aimed at lessening the water quality effects of hurricanes.


Storm Surge Submarine Groundwater Discharge Submerse Aquatic Vegetation Citrus Canker South Florida Water Management District 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bales, J. D., C. J. Oblinger, and A. H. Sallenger Jr. 2000. Two months of flooding in eastern North Carolina, September–October 1999: Hydrologic, water quality, and geologic effects of Hurricanes Dennis, Floyd and Irene, U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4093, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  2. Bayley, P. B. 1995 Understanding large river-floodplain ecosystems.BioScience 45:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesch, D. F., R. J. Diaz, andR. W. Virnstein. 1976. Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on soft-bottom macrobenthic communities of the James and York estuaries and the lower Chesapeake Bay.Chesapeake Science 17:246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkholder, J. M., D. A. Dickey, C. Kinder, R. E. Reed, M. A. Mallin, G. Melia, M. R. McIver, L. B. Cahoon, C. Brownie N. Deamer, J. Springer, H. B. Glasgow, D. Toms, andJ. Smith. 2006 Comprehensive trend analysis of nutrients and related variables in a large eutrophic estuary: A decadal study of anthropogenic and climatic influences.Limnology and Oceanography 51:463–487.Google Scholar
  5. Burkholder, J., D. Eggleston, H. Glasgow, C. Brownie, R. Reed, G. Janowitz, M. Posey, G. Melia, C. Kinder, R. Corbett, D. Toms, T. Alphin, N. Deamer, andJ. Springer. 2004. Compariative impacts of two major hurricane seasons on the Neuse River and western Pamlico Sound ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:9291–9296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkholder, J. M., M. A. Mallin, andH. B. Glasgow Jr. 1999. Fish kills, bottom-water hypoxia, and the toxicPfiesteria complex in the Neuse River and Estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 179:301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahoon, L. B., M. A. Mallin, F. M. Bingham, S. A. Kissling, andJ. E. Nearhoof. 2001 Monitoring the coastal ocean: Responses to Hurricane Floyd, p. 247–253.In J. R. Maiolo, J. C. Whitehead, M. McGee, L. King, J. Johnson, and H. Stone (eds.), Facing Our Future: Hurricane Floyd and Recovery in the Coastal Plain. Coastal Carolina Press, Wilmington, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  8. Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. 1998. The Study of Seasonal and Spatial Patterns of Hypoxia in Upper Charlotte Harbor. Report to the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  9. Corbett, C. A., P. H. Doering, K. A. Madley, J. A. Ott, andD. A. Tomasko. 2005. Issues with using seagrass as an indicator of ecosystem condition, p. 229–245.In S. A. Bortone (ed.), Estuarine Indicators. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  10. Dame, R., M. Alber, D. Allen, A. Chalmers, R. Gardner, C. Gilman, B. Kjerfve, A. Lewitus, M. Mallin, C. Montague, J. Pinckney, andN. Smith. 2000. Estuaries of the south Atlantic coast of North America: Their geographical signatures.Estuaries 23:793–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, G. E., L. L. Loope, C. T. Roman, G. Smith, J. T. Tilmant, and M. Soukup. 1996. Effect of Hurricane Andrew on natural and archeological resources. U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center, Technical Report NPS/NRGCC/NRTR/96-02. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  12. Diaz, R. J. andR. Rosenberg. 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna.Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 33:245–303.Google Scholar
  13. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2005. Water Quality Status Report: Sarasota Bay and Peace and Myakka Rivers, FDEP, Division of Water Resource Management, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, T. H. 1997. Abundance, seasonality, community indices, trends and relationships with physicochemical factors of trawled fish in Upper Charlotte Harbor, Florida.Bulletin of Marine Science 60:739–763.Google Scholar
  15. Glasgow, H. B., J. M. Burkholder, R. E. Reed, A. J. Lewitus, andJ. E. Kleinman. 2004. Real-time monitoring of water quality: A review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing techniques.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 300:409–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldenberg, S. B., C. W. Landsea, A. M. Mestas-Nunez, andW. M. Gray. 2001. The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: Causes and implications.Science 293:474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu, C., F. E. Muller-Karger, andP. W. Swarzenski. 2006. Hurricanes, submarine groundwater discharge, and Florida's red tides.Geophysical Research Letters 33, L11601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Irey, M., T. R. Gottwald, J. Graham, G. Carlton, and T. Riley. 2005. Post-Hurricane Analysis of Citrus Canker Spread and Progress Towards the Development of a Predictive Model for Future Weather Related Spread. Proceedings of the International Citrus Canker and Huanglongbing Workshop, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, V. L. 2005. Primary productivity by phytoplankton: Temporal, spatial and tidal variability in two North Carolina tidal creeks M.S. Thesis, The University of North Carolina Wilmington, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  20. Junk, W. K., P. B. Bayley, andR. E. Sparks. 1989. The flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems.Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110–127.Google Scholar
  21. Knott, D. M., andR. M. Martore. 1991. The short-term effects of Hurricane Hugo on fishes and decapod crustaceans in the Ashley River and adjacent marsh creeks, South Carolina.Journal of Coastal Research SI8:335–356.Google Scholar
  22. Mallin, M. A. 2000. Impacts of industrial-scale swine and poultry production on rivers and estuaries.American Scientist 88:26–37.Google Scholar
  23. Mallin, M. A., V. L. Johnson, S. H. Ensign, andT. A. MacPherson. 2006. Factors contributing to hypoxia in rivers, lakes and streams.Limnology and Oceanography 51:690–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallin, M. A., M. H. Posey, M. R. McIver, D. C. Parsons, S. H. Ensign, andT. D. Alphin. 2002. Impacts and recovery from multiple hurricanes in a Piedmont-Coastal Plain river system.BioScience 52:999–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mallin, M. A., M. H. Posey, G. C. Shank, M. R. McIver, S. H. Ensign, andT. D. Alphin. 1999. Hurricane effects on water quality and benthos in the Cape Fear Watershed: Natural and anthropogenic impacts.Ecological Applications 9:350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morrison, G., R. Montgomery, A. Squires, R. Starks, E. Dehaven, and J. Ott 1997. Nutrient, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen concentrations in Charlotte Harbor: Existing conditions and long-term trends, p. 201–218.In S. F. Treat (ed.), Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Fort Myers, Florida.Google Scholar
  27. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) 1999. North Carolina Division of Water Quality Annual Report of Fish Kill Events 1999. NCDENR, Water Quality Section, Environmental Sciences Branch, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  28. National Research Council (NRC). 1993. Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Paerl, H. W., J. D. Bales, L. W. Ausley, C. P. Buzzelli, L. B. Crowder, L. B. Eby, J. M. Fear, M. Go, B. L. Peierls, T. L. Richardson, andJ. Ramus 2001. Ecosystem impacts of three sequential hurricanes (Dennis, Floyd, and Irene) on the United States' largest lagoonal estuary, Pamlico Sound, NC.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:5655–5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peierls, B. J., R. R. Christian, andH. W. Paerl. 2003. Water quality and phytoplankton as indicators of hurricane impacts on a large estuarine ecosystem.Estuaries 26:1329–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pimm, S. L., G. E. Davis, L. Loope, C. T. Roman, T. J. Smith III, andJ. T. Tilmant. 1994. Hurricane Andrew.BioScience 44:224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson, P. J. 2005. North Carolina Weather and Climate. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  33. Roman, C. T., N. G. Aumen, J. C. Trexler, R. J. Fennema, W. F. Loftus, andM. A. Soukup. 1994. Hurricane Andrew's impact on freshwater resources.BioScience 44:247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevens, P. W., D. A. Blewett, andJ. P. Casey. 2006. Short-term effects of a low dissolved oxygen event on estuarine fish assemblages following the passage of Hurricane Charley.Estuaries and Coasts 29:997–1003.Google Scholar
  35. Tabb, T. C. andA. C. Jones. 1962. Effects of Hurricane Donna on the aquatic fauna of north Florida Bay.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 91:375–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tilmant, J. T., R. W. Curry, R. Jones, A. Szmant, J. C. Zieman, M. Flora, M. B. Roblee, D. Smith, R. W. Snow, andH. Wanless. 1994. Hurricane Andrew's effect on marine resources.BioScience 44:230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tomasko, D. A., C. Anastasiou, andC. Kovach. 2006. Dissolved oxygen dynamics in Charlotte Harbor and its contributing watershed, in response to Hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne—Impacts and Recovery.Estuaries and Coasts 29:932–938.Google Scholar
  38. Valeila, I., P. Peckol, C. D'Avanzo, K. Lajtha, J. Kremer, W. R. Geyer, K. Foreman, D. Hersh, B. Seely, T. Isaji, andR. Crawford. 1996. Hurricane Bob on Cape Cod.American Scientist 84:154–165.Google Scholar
  39. Van Dolah, R. F. andG. S. Anderson. 1991. Effects of Hurricane Hugo on salinity and dissolved oxygen conditions in the Charleston Harbor Estuary.Journal of Coastal Research SI8:83–94.Google Scholar
  40. Wing, S., S. Freedman, andL. Band. 2002. The potential impact of flooding on confined animal feeding operations in eastern North Carolina.Environmental Health Perspectives 110:387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, R. S., D. M. Bush, A. S. Coburn, O. H. Pilkey, andW. J. Cleary. 1999. Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd: Coastal effects and policy implications.GSA Today 9:1–6.Google Scholar

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  1. Champeau, T. R. unpublished data. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 3900 Drane Field Road, Lakeland, Florida 33811.Google Scholar
  2. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DOACS). 2005. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Website “Citrus Canker” Scholar
  3. Lovelace, J. K. and B. F. McPherson. 1995. Restoration, Creation, and Recovery: Effects of Hurricane Andrew (1992) on Wetlands in Southern Florida and Louisiana. National Water Summary on Wetland Resources, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2425. Scholar
  4. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). 2005. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center Website “Climate of 2005 Summary of Hurricane Katrina, Last Updated September 1st, 2005” http:// Scholar
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2005. NOAA attributes recent increase in hurricane activity to naturally occurring multi-decadal climate variability, NOAA Magazine, November 29, 2005. Scholar
  6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML). 2005. Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory Hurricane Research Division Website http:// Scholar
  7. National Weather Service (NWS). 2004. Post-Storm Data Acquisition Aerial Wind Mapping Mission Hurricane Charley-2004. October 25, 2004. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service. http://www. Scholar
  8. St. Pé. K. M. personal communication. Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program, Nicholls State University Campus, P. O. Box 2663, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70310Google Scholar
  9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2006. Federal Emergency Management Agency and Army Corps of Engineers Website “Hurricane Charley Post-Storm Assessment”, Last updated February 2005. http://chps.sam.usace. Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Marine ScienceUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmington
  2. 2.Charlotte Harbor National Estuary ProgramFort Myers

Personalised recommendations