Skip to main content
Log in

Biological monitoring, by in vivo XRF measurements, of occupational exposure to lead, cadmium, and mercury

  • In-Vivo Determinations
  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vivo X-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques were used for biological monitoring of lead, cadmium, and mercury. Lead accumulates in bone, the level of which may thus be used for monitoring of exposure. However, there was no close association between lead levels in bone and exposure time, partly because of differences in exposure patterns and partly, probably, because of variations in the toxicokinetics of lead. There are at least two separate bone lead compartments. The average over-all half-time is probably 5–10 yr. The finger bone level may be an index of the lead status of the total skeleton. In lead workers, the mobilization of bone lead causes an “internal” lead exposure and affects the blood lead level considerably. In cadmium workers, in vivo XRF is a sensitive and risk-free method for assessment of accumulation in kidney cortex, the critical tissue as to toxic effects; workers displayed increased levels. However, there was no clear association with duration and intensity of exposure, cadmium levels in urine, or microglobulinuria. Determinations of kidney cadmium may add important information on the state of accumulation and, thus, risk of kidney damage. Workers exposed to elemental mercury vapor, as well as fishermen exposed to methyl mercury, had mercury levels in bone below the detection limit of the XRF method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Skerfving,Toxicology 2, 3 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Welinder, S. Skerfving, and O. Henriksen,Br. J. Ind. Med. 34, 22 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Welinder, M. Littorin, B. Gullberg, and S. Skerfving,Scand. J. Work Environ. Hlth. 9, 397 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Skerfving, L. Ahlgren, J.-O. Christoffersson, B. Haeger-Aronsen, S. Mattsson, and A. Schütz,Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 34, 277 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO,Techn. Rep. Ser. 647 (1980).

  6. J.-O. Christoffersson, A. Schütz, L. Ahlgren, B. Haeger-Aronsen, S. Mattsson, and S. Skerfving,Am. J. Ind. Med. 6, 447 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Ahlgren, K. Lidén, S. Mattsson, and S. Tejning,Scand. J. Work. Environ. Hlth. 2, 82 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Ahlgren, B. Haeger-Aronsen, S. Mattsson, A. Schütz,Br. J. Ind. Med. 37, 109 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Schütz, J. Ranstam, and S. Skerfving, XXIInternational Congress on Occupational Health, Dublin, Ireland, 1984, p. 199, Abstract.

  10. A. Schütz and Skerfving, S.,Scand. J. Work environ. Hlth. 3, 176 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Schütz, S. Skerfving, B. Gullberg, and B. Haeger-Aronsen, XXInternational Congress on Occupational Health, Cairo, Egypt, 1981, p. 144, Abstract.

  12. M. B. Rabinowitz, G. W. Wetherill, and J. D. Kopple,J. Clin. Invest. 58, 260 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. A. Roels, R. R. Lauwerys, J.-P. Buchet, A. Bernard, D. R. Chettle, and T. C. Harvey,Environ. Res. 26, 217 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. J. Ellis, S. Yasumura, D. Vartsky, and S. H. Cohn,Fund. Appl. Tox. 3, 169 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Adamsson,Scand. J. Work Envir. Hlth. 5, 178 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J.-O. Christoffersson and S. Mattsson,Phys. Med. Biol. 28, 1135 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. G. Elinder, T. Kjellström, L. Friberg, B. Lind, and L. Linnman,Arch. Environ. Hlth. 25, 292 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Kjellström, C. G. Elinder, and L. Friberg,Environ Res. 33, 284 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. I. M. Shapiro, D. R. Cornblath, A. J. Sumner, B. Uzell, L. K. Spitz, I. I. Ship, and P. Bloch,Lancei,i, 1147 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Schütz and S. Skerfving,Scand. J. Work Environ. Hlth. 1, 54 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Friberg and J. Vostal,Mercury in the Environment. A Toxicological and Epidemiological Appraisal, CRC, Cleveland, Ohio, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skerfving, S., Christoffersson, JO., Schütz, A. et al. Biological monitoring, by in vivo XRF measurements, of occupational exposure to lead, cadmium, and mercury. Biol Trace Elem Res 13, 241–251 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796636

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796636

Index Entries

Navigation