Skip to main content
Log in

Origin and resolution of the aluminum controversy concerning Alzheimer’s neurofibrillary degeneration

  • Applications of Trace Metal Analysis to Basic Problems in Neurobiology
  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elevated concentrations of aluminum are found in regions of neurofibrillary change in brains with senile or presenile dementia of Alzheimer’s type. The concentrations of aluminum found in the human disease are comparable to those found in experimental animals with aluminum-induced neurofibrillary degeneration (NFD). Although there are a number of reports confirming these observations, two laboratories have been unable to detect elevated levels in Alzheimer’s disease. We conducted an interlaboratory study to resolve this discrepancy and traced the discrepancy to difficulties in analytical procedures. We concluded that failure to detect elevated aluminum levels associated with NFD is the result of (a) lack of strict adherence to the criteria for sample selection; (b) selection of too large a sample for analysis; and (c) use of analytical methodology that has potential matrix interference for the measured signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. R. Crapper, S. S. Krishnan, and A. J. Dalton,Science 180, 511 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. Crapper, S. S. Krishnan, and S. Quittkat,Brain 99, 67 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. R. Crapper, S. Karlik, and U. De Boni,Alzheimer’s Disease: Senile Dementia and Related Disorders, Aging, vol. 7, R. Katzman, R. D. Terry, and K. L. Bick, eds., Raven, New York, NY, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. R. Trapp, G. D. Miner, R. L. Zimmerman, R. A. Mastri, and L. L. Helstron,Biol. Psychol. 13, 709 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. R. Crapper, S. Quittkat, S. S. Krishnan, A. J. Dalton, and U. De Boni,Acta Neuropathol. 50, 19 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. P. Perl and A. R. Brody,Science 208, 297 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. P. Perl, D. C. Gajdusek, R. M. Garruto, R. Yanagihara, and C. V. Gibbs,Science 217, 1053 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. R. Markesbury, W. D. Ehmann, T. I. M. Hossaim, M. Alauddin, and D. T. Goodin,Ann. Neurol. 10, 511 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. R. McDermott, A. I. Smith, K. Iqbal, and H. M. Wisniewski,Neurology 29, p. 809 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Fritze and R. Robertson,J. Radioanal. Chem. 7, 213 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. S. Krishnan, S. Quittkat, and D. R. Crapper,Can. J. Spectroscopy 21, 1, 25 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. D. Terry, Albert Einstein’s School of Med., Dept. of Path., Personal Communication (1980).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishnan, S.S., Harrison, J.E. & McLachlan, D.R.C. Origin and resolution of the aluminum controversy concerning Alzheimer’s neurofibrillary degeneration. Biol Trace Elem Res 13, 35–42 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796619

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796619

Index Entries

Navigation