Skip to main content
Log in

What does higher ED think about educational technology services?

A study of differing perceptions

  • Media Management
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anandam, K. (1986). Technology for education: Promises and problems. In G.H. Voegel (Ed.),Advances in instructional technology, 65–72. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1977).Educational Technology: Definition and glossary of terms. Washington, DC.

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1989).Standards for college and university learning resource programs: Technology in instruction. Washington, DC.

  • Cornell, R.A. (Fall, 1984).Emerging technologies: Ideas for Education. Orlando, Florida: University of Central Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A.J. (1982). Educational technology and educational practice: The case of lifelong learning. In C.K. Knapper (Ed.),Expanding learning through communications technologies, 69–80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (Ed).(1979).Guide for self-study of medial educational technology service programs in higher education. Seattle: Northwest College and University Council for Management of Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirr, P.J. (1986).Research on evaluation of instruction by telecommunications. San Francisco, California: 67th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 274–299).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A.D. (1981). Development and validation of cafeteria system to assess faculty perceptions of instructional development services at four year higher education institutions (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1981).Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol.42: 1916A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. (1983). Where CAI is effective: A summary of research.Electronic Learning, Vol.3(3), 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, M.C., Jones, R.T., & Hinz, R.P. (1980).The functionally integrated learning resources center. Pullman, WA: Information Futures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D.T. (1977).Cost factors in planning educational technology systems. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapper, C.K. (1988). Technology and college teaching. In R.E. Young & K.E. Eble (Eds.),College teaching and learning: Preparing for new commitments, 31–46. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R.J. (1985).Faculty perspectives on the role of information technologies in academic instruction. Portland, OR: Learning and Technology Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 274 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lied, J.R. (1979). What’s the bottom line for your media center?Audiovisual Instruction, Vol.24(2), 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, I.R. & Drob, H.A. (1977).Criteria for planning the college and university learning resources center. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, W.T. (1980).Media center management. New York: Hastings House Publishers. Tucker, R.N. (1979).The organization and management of educational technology. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eidgahy, S.Y., Bennett, R.V. What does higher ED think about educational technology services?. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 36, 25–30 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02790764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02790764

Keywords

Navigation