Abstract
We study the existence of solutions of the nonlinear problem {fx349-1} where μ is a bounded measure andg is a continuous nondecreasing function such thatg(0)=0. In this paper, we assume that the nonlinearityg satisfies {fx349-2} Problem (0.1) need not have a solution for every measure μ. We prove that, given μ, there exists a “closest” measure μ* for which (0.1) can be solved. We also explain how assumption (0.2) makes problem (0.1) different from the case whereg(t) is defined for everyt ∈ ℝ.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Ancona,Une propriété d'invariance des ensembles absorbants par perturbation d'un opérateur elliptique, Comm. Partial Differential Equations4 (1979), 321–337.
L. Boccardo,On the regularizing effect of strongly increasing lower order terms. J. Evol. Equ.3 (2003), 225–236.
L. Boccardo, T. Gallouët and L. Orsina,Existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations with measure data, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire13 (1996), 539–551.
H. Brezis, M. Marcus and A. C. Ponce,Nonlinear elliptic equations with measures revisited. Annals of Math. Studies, Princeton University Press, to appear. Part of the results were announced in a note by the same authors:A new concept of reduced measure for nonlinear elliptic equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I339 (2004), 169–174.
H. Brezis and A. C. Ponce,Remarks on the strong maximum principle, Differential Integral Equations16 (2003), 1–12.
H. Brezis and A. C. Ponce,Kato's inequality when Δu is a measure, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I338 (2004), 599–604.
H. Brezis and W. A. Strauss,Semilinear second-order elliptic equations in L 1, J. Math. Soc. Japan25 (1973), 565–590.
L. Carleson,Selected Problems on Exeptional Sets, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1967.
G. Dal Maso, F. Murat, L. Orsina and A. Prignet,Renormalized solutions of elliptic equations with general measure data, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa CI. Sci. (4)28 (1999), 741–808.
P. Dall'Aglio and G. Dal Maso,Some properties of the solutions of obstacle problems with measure data, Ricerche Mat.48 (1999), 99–116. Papers in memory of Ennio De Giorgi.
P. Dall'Aglio and C. Leone,Obstacles problems with measure data and linear operators, Potential Anal.17 (2002), 45–64.
C. De La Vallée Poussin,Sur l'intégrale de Lebesgue, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.16 (1915), 435–501.
C. Dellacherie and P.-A. Meyer,Probabilités et potentiel, Chapitres I à IV, Publications de l'Institut de Mathématique de l'Université de Strasbourg, No. XV, Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, No. 1372, Hermann, Paris, 1975.
L. Dupaigne and A. C. Ponce,Singularities of positive supersolutions in elliptic PDEs, Selecta Math. (N.S.)10 (2004), 341–358.
L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy,Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, Studies in Advanced Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992.
M. Fukushima, K. Sato and S. Taniguchi,On the closable parts of pre-Dirichlet forms and the fine supports of underlying measures, Osaka J. Math.28 (1991), 517–535.
M. Grun-Rehomme,Caractérisation du sous-différential d'intégrandes convexes dans les espaces de Sobolev, J. Math. Pures Appl.56 (1977), 149–156.
A. C. Ponce,How to construct good measures, inElliptic and Parabolic Equations (C. Bandle, H. Berestycki, B. Brighi, A. Brillard, M. Chipot, J.-M. Coron, C. Sbordone, I. Shafrir, V. Valente and G. Vergara-Caffarelli, eds.), Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, 63, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2005, pp. 335–348. A special tribute to the work of Haïm Brezis.
G. Stampacchia,Le problème de Dirichlet pour les équations elliptiques du second ordre à coefficients discontinus, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)15 (1965), 189–258.
J. L. Vázquez,On a semilinear equation in ℝ 2 involving bounded measures, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A95 (1983), 181–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dupaigne, L., Ponce, A.C. & Porretta, A. Elliptic equations with vertical asymptotes in the nonlinear term. J. Anal. Math. 98, 349–396 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02790280
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02790280