Skip to main content
Log in

Optimum combination of targeted131I therapy and total-body irradiation for treatment of disseminated tumors of differing radiosensitivity

  • Published:
Cell Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

131I is the radionuclide most commonly used in biologically targeted radiotherapy at the present time. Microdosimetric analysis has shown that microtumors whose diameters are less than the β-particle maximum range absorb radiation energy inefficiently from targeted radionuclides. Micrometastases of diameters <1 mm are likely to be spared if targeted131I is used as a single modality. Because of this, combined modality therapy incorporating targeted131I, external beam total-body irradiation (TBI), and bone marrow rescue has been proposed. In this study, the minimum necessary TBI component is shown to depend on the radiosensitivity of the tumor cells. The analysis shows that the TBI component, to achieve radiocurability, increases directly with tumor radioresistance. For the most radiosensitive tumors, a whole-body TBI treatment dose 2×2 Gy is calculated to be obligatory, whereas practical tumors, the analysis implies that a TBI treatment delivery of 5×2 Gy is obligatory. In all situation, external beam TBI appears to be an essential factor in providing reasonable probability of cure of disseminated malignant disease. Reasonable prospects of tumor cure by combination strategies incorporating131I exist for the more radiosensitive tumor types (e.g., neuroblastoma, lymphoma, leukemia, myeloma, seminoma), but more resistant tumors are unlikely to be curable at present. Superior targeting agents, and the possible use of panels of different radionuclides, may be necessary to achieve high cure probabilities for less radiosensitive tumor types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O'Donoghue, J. A., Wheldon, T. E., Babich, J. W., Moyes, J. S. E., Barrett, A., and Meller, S. T. (1991) Implications of the uptake of131I-radiolabelled meta-iodo-benzyl-guanidine (mIBG) for the targeted radiotherapy of neuroblastoma.Br. J. Radiol. 53, 210–227.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wheldon, T. E., O'Donoghue, J. A., and Barrett, A. (1993) Radiocurability of disseminated malignant disease by external beam irradiation and targeted radionuclide therapy, inAdvances in the Applications of Monoclonal Antibodies in Clinical Oncology: 8th International Meeting (Epenetos, A.E., ed.), Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Humm, J. L. (1986) Dosimetric aspects of radiolabelled antibodies for tumour therapy.J. Nucl. Med. 27, 422–427.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steel, G. G., Adams, G. E., and Horwich, A. (1989)The Biological Basis of Radiotherapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fertil, B. and Malaise, E. P. (1985) Intrinsic radiosensitivity of human cell lines is correlated with radioresponsiveness of human tumors: analysis of 101 published survival curves.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 11, 1699–1707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steel, G. G. and Wheldon, T. E. (1991) The radiation biology of paedia tric tumors, inPaediatric Oncology (Plowman, P.N. and Pinkerton, C.R., eds.), Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dale, R. G. (1985) The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy.Br. J. Radiol. 58, 515–528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wheldon, T. E., O'Donoghue, J. A., and Barrett, A., and Michalowski, A. S. (1991) The curability of tumours of differeing size by targeted radiotherapy using131I or90Y.Radiother. Oncol. 21, 91–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dillman, L. T. (1969) Radionuclide decay schemes and nuclear parameters for use in radiation dose estimates. MIRD Pamphlet 4. J. Nucl. Med. 10 Suppl. 2.

  10. Loevinger, R. and Berman, M. (1968) A schema for absorbed dose calculations for biologically-distributed radionuclides. MIRD Pamphlet 1.J. Nucl. Med. 9(Suppl. 1), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Snyder, W. S., Ford, M. R., Warner, G. G., and Fisher, H. L. (1969) Estimate of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. MIRD Pamphlet 5.J. Nucl. Med. 10(Suppl. 3), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wheldon, T. E., O'Donoghue, J. A., Hilditch, T. E., and Barrett, A. (1988) Strategies for systemic radiotherapy of micrometastases using antibodytargeted131I.Radiother. Oncol. 11, 133–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Donoghue, J. A. (1991) Optimum scheduling of combined biologically targeted radiotherapy and total body irradiation with bone marrow rescue for the treatment of systemic malignant disease.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 21, 1587–1594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amin, A.E., Wheldon, T.E., O'Donoghue, J.A. et al. Optimum combination of targeted131I therapy and total-body irradiation for treatment of disseminated tumors of differing radiosensitivity. Cell Biophysics 21, 139–152 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789484

Index Entries

Navigation