Abstract
We prove that the following statement is independent of ZFC+┐CH: IFT is a superstable theory of power <2ℵ 0,M≰N are models ofT withQ(M)=Q(N), then there isN′≱N withQ(N)=Q(N′). This generalizes Lachlan’s (1972) result.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. T. Baldwin,Conservative extensions and the two-cardinal theorem for stable theories, Fund. Math.88 (1975), 7–9.
V. Harnik,A two-cardinal theorem for sets of formulas in a stable theory, Isr. J. Math.21 (1975), 7–23.
K. Kunen,Random and Cohen reals, inHandbook of Set-theoretical Topology (K. Kunen and J. E. Vaughan, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 887–911.
A. H. Lachlan,A property of stable theories, Fund. Math.77 (1972), 9–20.
D. Lascar,Types définissible et produit de types, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris276 (1973), 1253–1256.
A. W. Miller, Covering 2ω with ω1 disjoint closed sets, The Kleene Symp. Proc. Symp. Univ. Wisconsin, 1978, Studies in Logic and Found. Math.101, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 415–421.
A. W. Miller,Some properties of measure and category, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.266 (1981), 93–114.
L. Newelski,On partitions of the real line into compact sets, J. Symb. Logic52 (1987), 353–359.
S. Shelah,Classification Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newelski, L. Independence results for uncountable superstable theories. Israel J. Math. 65, 59–78 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788174
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788174