Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of protease immobilization by covalent binding using glutaraldehyde

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immobilization of a protease, Flavourzyme, by covalent binding on various carriers was investigated. Lewatit R258-K, activated with glutaraldehyde, was selected among the tested carriers, because of the highest immobilized enzyme activity. The optimization of activation and immobilization conditions was performed to obtain high recovery yield. The activity recovery decreased with increasing carrier loading over an optimal value, indicating the inactivation of enzymes by their reaction with uncoupled aldehyde groups of carriers. The buffer concentrations for carrier activation and enzyme immobilization were optimally selected as 500 and 50 mM, respectively. With increasing enzyme loading, the immobilized enzyme activity increased, but activity recovery decreased. Immobilization with a highly concentrated enzyme solution was advantageous for both the immobilized enzyme activity and activity recovery. Consequently, the optimum enzyme and carrier loadings for the immobilization of Flavourzyme were determined as 1.8 mg enzyme/mL and 0.6 g resin/mL, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lahl, W. J. and Braun, S. D. (1994),Food Technol. October, 68–71.

  2. Olsen, H. S. and Adler-Nissen, J. (1979),Process Biochem. July, 6–11.

  3. Bernadi D. L. S., Pilosof, A. M. R., and Bartholomai, G. B. (1991),JAOCS 68, 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weetall, H. H. (1976), inMethod in Enzymology, vol.44 (Mosbach, K., ed). Academic Press, New York, pp. 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaplin, M. F. and Bucke, C. (1990),Enzyme Technology, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parrado, J., Millan, R., and Bautista, J. (1995),Process Biochem. 30, 735–741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley, W. L. and Olson, A. C. (1974),J. Food Sci. 39, 660–666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marty, J.-L. (1985),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22, 88–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wasserman, B. P. and Hultin, H. O. (1980),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17, 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mansfeld, J. and Schellenberger, A. (1987),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29, 72–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradford, M. M. (1976),Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi, T. and Ikada Y. (1990),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35, 518–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chae, H.J., In, MJ. & Kim, E.Y. Optimization of protease immobilization by covalent binding using glutaraldehyde. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 73, 195–204 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785655

Index Entries

Navigation