Skip to main content
Log in

Relative fermentability of lignocellulosic diluteacid prehydrolysates

Application of a pichia stipitisbased toxicity assay

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative toxicity of the combined nonxylose components in prehydrolysates derived from three different lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks was determined. One woody (poplar) and two herbaceous (corn stover and switchgrass) feedstocks were dilute-acid pretreated under temperature and acid conditions chosen to optimize xylose recovery in the liquid prehydrolysate; xylose yields averaged 96,89,and 87% of theoretical for switchgrass,corn stover,and poplar,respectively. Prehydrolysates from each feedstock were neutralized,adjusted to equivalent xylose concentrations,and bioassayed for toxicity,using a standardized fermentation protocol withPichia stipitis NRRL 11545. Full time-courses for ethanol production (30-60 h) clearly illustrate the distinct inhibitory effects of prehydrolysates from different feedstocks. The relative toxicity of the prehydrolysates,ranked in order of decreasing toxicity,is poplar-derived prehydrolysates > switchgrass-derived prehydrolysates > corn stover-derived prehydrolysates. The inhibition of ethanol production appeared to be the result of a general slowdown of yeast metabolism,rather than the result of the production of alternative, nonethanol end products. Ethanol yields averaged 74,83,and 88% of control values for poplar,switchgrass,and corn stover prehydrolysates, respectively. Volumetric ethanol productivities (g ethanol L/h) averaged 32,70,and 102% of control values for poplar,switchgrass,and corn stover prehydrolysates,respectively. Ethanol productivities correlated closely with acetate concentrations in the prehydrolysates; however, regression lines correlating acetate concentrations and ethanol productivities were found to be feedstock-dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Penner, M. H., Hashimoto, A. G., Esteghlalian, A., and Fenske, J. J. (1996), inAgricultural Materials as Renewable Resources—Nonfood and Industrial Applications (Fuller, G., McKeon, T. A., and Bills, D. D., eds.), Am. Chem. Soc. pp. 12–31.

  2. Spindler, D. D., Wyman, C. E., and Grohmann, K. (1991),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 773–786.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olsson, L. and Hahn-Hägerdahl, B. (1996),Enz. Microb. Technol. 18, 312–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Puls, J. and Schuseil, J. (1993) inHemicellulose and Hemicellulases (Hazlewood, G. and Coughlan M.,eds.), London, pp. 1–27.

  5. Hinman, N. D., Wright, J. D., Hoagland, W., and Wyman, C. E. (1989),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Skoog, K. and Hahn-Haegerdahl, B. (1988),Enz. Microb. Technol. 10, 66–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeppsson, H. (1996), Doctoral Dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, J. J., Deschatelets L., and Nishikawa, N. K. (1989),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 592–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parekh, S. R., Parekh, R. S., and Wayman, M. (1988),Enz. Microb. Tech. 10, 660–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qureshi, N. and Manderson, G. J. (1991),J. Industr. Microbiol. 7, 117–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tran, A. V. and Chambers, R. P. (1986),Enz. Microb. Technol. 8, 439–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberto, I. C., Lacis, L. S., Barbosa, M. F. S., and de Mancilha, I. M. (1991),Process Biochem. 26, 15–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hahn-Haegerdahl, B., Jeppsson, H., Olsson, L., and Mohagheghi, A. (1994),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Perego, P., Converti, A., Palazzi E., del Borghi, M., and Ferraiolo, G. (1990),J. Ind. Microbiol. 6, 157–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrari, M. D., Neirotti, E., Albornoz, C., and Saucedo, E. (1992),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40, 753–759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Downing, M., McLaughlin, S., and Walsh, M. J. (1995), in Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy, Environment, Agriculture, and Industry Proceedings, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanderson, M. A., Reed, R. L., McLaughlin, S. B., Wullschleger, S. D., Conger, B. V., Parrish, D. J., et al. (1996)Biores. Technol. 56, 83–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Esteghlalian, A., Hashimoto, A. G., Fenske, J. J., and Penner, M. H. (1997),Biores. Technol. 59, 129–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boynton, B. L. and McMillan, J. D. (1994),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45/46, 509–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fenske, J. J. (1994), M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Or.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frazer, F. R. and McCaskey, T. A. (1989),Biomass 18, 31–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans, C. T. and Ratledge, C. (1984),Arch. Microbiol. 139, 48–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delgenes, J., Moletta, R., and Navarro, J. (1988),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol,29, 155–161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van Zyl, C., Prior, B. A., and du Preez, J. C. (1991),Enz. Microb. Technol. 13, 82–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Delgenes, J. P., Moletta, R., and Navarro, J. M. (1996),Enz. Microb. Technol. 19, 220–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Publication Number 11114

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenske, J.J., Hashimoto, A. & Penner, M.H. Relative fermentability of lignocellulosic diluteacid prehydrolysates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 73, 145–157 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785651

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785651

Index Entries

Navigation