Skip to main content
Log in

Doublet cells inTetrahymena as indicators of culture media composition

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stomatogenesis in ciliates is a complex and carefully orchestrated event. The exo mutant SB255 ofTetrahymena thermophila has defects in mucocyst formation and docking and can also have one or two mouths. Three common culture media (proteose peptone, Medium 357, and yeast extract) were analyzed for total C, N, and inorganic elements and then tested for their effect on the number of mouths present in SB255. Cultures of SB255 grown in Medium 357 consisted of a mixed population of cells with either two mouths (doublet) or one mouth. Cultures from the same original stock grown in Medium 357 (SBm) and in 1% proteose peptone (SBpp) had different percentages of doublet cells in 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-d-old cultures. When transferred to and grown in 1% yeast medium, both SBpp and SBm cultures had increased percentages of doublets over a 4-d culture period. When grown in 0.1, 0.5, or 1% yeast medium for 2 d, both SBpp and SBm cultures had more doublets in 1% than in either 0.1 or 0.5% yeast medium. Cultures of SBm grown in Medium 357. or 1% yeast medium for 2 d had a 10-fold increase in doublet cells compared to the inoculum. After 2 d in 1% proteose peptone, SBm cultures had percentages of doublet cells almost equal to that of the inoculum. Immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to examine cellular morphology of the doublet cells. These findings suggest that enriched media promote the growth of doublet cells. Furthermore, these doublets could prove to be a useful model system for the study of biological roles of trace elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Orias, M. Flacks, and B. H. Satir,J. Cell Sci. 64, 49–67 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Jerka-Dziadosz and J. Frankel,J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 49, 167–202 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Frankel and E. M. Nelson,Develop. Gen. 6, 213–238 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Frankel and E. M. Nelson Intracellular pattern reversal inTetrahymena thermophila. II. Transient expression of ajanus phenocopy in balanced doublets.Develop. Biol. 114, 72–86 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. M. Nelson and J. Frankel,Develop. Biol. 114, 53–71 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. P. Capdevila and A. Garcia-Bellido,Nature 250, 500–502 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. M. Lilly, inChemical Zoology (Kidder, G. W., Ed.), Vol. 1, Academic, Press, New York, pp. 275–307 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. L. Hill, inCell Biology: A Series of Monographs (Buetow, D. E., Padilla, G. M., and Cameron, I. L., Eds.), Academic, New York, pp. 176–192 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. H. Hutner, H. Baker, O. Frank, and D. Cox, inBiology of Nutrition, R. N. T-W-Fiennes, ed., Pergammon, Oxford, pp. 85–177 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. V. Slater,Physiol. Zool. 25, 283–287 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. P. Hall,J. Protozool. 1, 74–79 (1954).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Tiedtke,J. Protozool. 32(2), 317–320 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. V. Hue and C. V. Evans, inDepartmental Series No. 106, Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, AL (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Estridge, A. Southwood, M. Mayo, and C. A. SundermannJ. Eukary. Microbiol. 40(1), 13A (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. M. Nelson,Develop. Biol. 66, 17–31 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. J. Gehring,Science 236, 1245–1252 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Laskowski,Manufacuter's Typical Analysis, Difco Laboratories, Inc., Detroit (1992) (personal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. W. Kidder, V. C. Dewey, and R. E. Parks, Jr.,Physiol. Zool. 24, 69–75 (1951).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. S. Roth,Exp. Cell Res. 10, 146 (1956).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Czupryn, K. H. Falchuk, and B. L. Vallee,Biochemistry 26, 8263–8269 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. V. Agte, S. A. Chiplonkar, and M. K. Gokhale,Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 669, 313–316 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. M. Downey and A. G. So, InMetal Ions in Biological Systems, H. Sigel, ed., Vol. 25, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 1–30 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. J. Kendrick, M. T. May, M. J. Plishka, and K. D. Robinson, inMetals in Biological Systems, J. Burgess, ed.., Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, England, pp. 130–138 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christopher, G.K., Sundermann, C.A. Doublet cells inTetrahymena as indicators of culture media composition. Biol Trace Elem Res 50, 181–191 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785409

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785409

Index Entries

Navigation