Skip to main content
Log in

Pure objects and the ontological argument

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Footnote

  1. In Margolis, J. (ed.),Fact and Existence (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trans. Haldane and Ross,The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press:1970).

  3. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963. Second Edition.

  4. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937. Seconds Edition.

  5. Findlay, op. cit., p. 47.

  6. Meinong. ‘The Theory of Objects’, in Chisholm, R.M. (ed.),Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press, 1960) p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Op. cit. p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Review of Meinong,Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, inMind, 1905.

  9. Kenny, op. cit., p.33.

  10. Findlay, op. cit., pp. 103. 4.

  11. Meinong, op. cit. ‘ p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Descartes’ Reply to Caterus (Haldane and Ross, op. cit.,The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press: 1970). vol. 2. pp. 19–22.)

  13. Proslogion, ch. 2, in Hick and McGill (eds.),The Many-Faced Argument London: Macmillan, 1968), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brecher, R. Pure objects and the ontological argument. SOPH 14, 10–18 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784637

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784637

Keywords

Navigation