Footnote
In Margolis, J. (ed.),Fact and Existence (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).
Trans. Haldane and Ross,The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press:1970).
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963. Second Edition.
London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937. Seconds Edition.
Findlay, op. cit., p. 47.
Meinong. ‘The Theory of Objects’, in Chisholm, R.M. (ed.),Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press, 1960) p. 84.
Op. cit. p. 25.
Review of Meinong,Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, inMind, 1905.
Kenny, op. cit., p.33.
Findlay, op. cit., pp. 103. 4.
Meinong, op. cit. ‘ p. 85.
Cf. Descartes’ Reply to Caterus (Haldane and Ross, op. cit.,The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press: 1970). vol. 2. pp. 19–22.)
Proslogion, ch. 2, in Hick and McGill (eds.),The Many-Faced Argument London: Macmillan, 1968), p. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brecher, R. Pure objects and the ontological argument. SOPH 14, 10–18 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784637
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784637