Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of altered selenium and vitamin E nutritional status on learning and memory of third-generation rats

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed that selenium (Se) and Vitamin E (Vit E) are involved synergistically in protection of cell membrane lipids from peroxidation. However, little is known about the effect of both deficiencies of Se and Vit E and toxic status of those antioxidants on the peroxidation potentiality of the brain. We aimed to study the effects of both Se and Vit E inadequate diet and Se rich diet on the learning and memory processes of third-generation young rats. Their ancestors were also fed by the same diets starting from their births. To test the learning and memory, the rats aged 60 days were trained by using automated two ways active avoidance shuttle box. The acquisition tests were terminated with training the rat from each group to be 25 trials per day during three days. Ten days after the last acquisition test, the retention test was performed and the acquisition of the conditioned avoidance responses (CAR) of the rats were evaluated. It is demonstrated that the CAR of all rats from three groups showed a significant increase in three consecutive days while the differences observed in CAR of same sessions was not significantly different among three groups. The memory process of these young rats also was not affected significantly by two types of diets. Under the light of our results one can suggest that, in the case of alterations in antioxidant defense status, the learning and the memory mechanisms seems to be not affected. Further researches are needed to be able to explain the possible role of oxidative stress on the mechanisms of learning and memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Schofield and R. G. L. Pullen,J. Physiol. 480.P, 15P (1994).

  2. K. Huang, E. Lauridsen, and J. Clausen,Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 46, 91–102 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Behne, H. Hilmert, S. Scheid, H. Gessner, and W. Elger,Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 966, 12–21 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. D. Buckman, M. S. Sutphin, and C. D. Eckert,Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1163, 176–184 (1993).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. G. Hoekstra,Federation Proc. 34(11), 2083–2089 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Matsuo, F. Gomi, and M. M. Dooley,Mech. Ageing Dev. 64, 273–292 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Monji, N. Morimoto, I Okuyoma, N. Yamashita, and N. Tashiro,Brain Res. 634, 62–68 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Néve,Experientia 47, 187–193 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Watanabe and H. Satoh,Physiol. Behav. 56(5), 927–932 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Xia, K.E. Hill, and R.F. Burk,J. Nutr. 119, 1318–1326 (1989).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. K. Makar, M. Nedergaard, A. Preuss, A. S. Gelbard, A. S. Perumal, and A. J. L. Cooper,J. Neurochem. 62, 45–53 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Behne and W. Wolters,J. Nutr. 113, 456–461 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Caravaggi, F. L. Clark, and A. R. B. Jackson,Res. Vet. Sci. 11, 146–149 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. E. Spallholz,Free Radic. Biol. Med. 17(1), 45–64 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. B. A. Smyth, J. H. Wang, R. M. Barlow, D. J. Humphreys, M. Robins, and J. B. J. Stodulski,J. Comp. Path. 102, 197–209 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Prohaska and H. E. Ganther,J. Neurochem. 27, 1379–1387 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B. Turan, Ö. Hotamoroglu, E. Demirel-Yilmaz,Cardiovas. Pharmacol, accepted for publication (1997).

  18. Z. Xie and B. R. Sastry,Brain Res. 604, 173–179 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Xie and B. R. Sastry,Brain Res. 681(1-2), 193–196 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Castano, J. Cano, and A. Machado,J. Neurochem. 61, 1302–1307 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Salbe and O. Levander,J. Nutr. 120(2), 207–212 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Constantinides, M. Harkey, and D. McLaury,Wirvhows Arch. (Path. Anat.) 409, 583–593 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. J. Parnham and E. Graf,Biochem. Pharmacol. 36(19), 3095–3102 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baştug, M., Ayhan, S. & Turan, B. The effect of altered selenium and vitamin E nutritional status on learning and memory of third-generation rats. Biol Trace Elem Res 64, 151–160 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02783331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02783331

Index entries

Navigation