Abstract
Metals are ubiquitous in the human environment, making exposure inevitable and requiring scientifically sound risk assessment methodology to ensure adequate health protection. Within this area, as part of its ongoing efforts to improve and harmonize internationally approaches to risk assessments, the International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS) has initiated work to improve the risk assessment procedures for essential trace elements (ETEs).
Zn, Cu, Se, Cr, and MO are ETEs for humans, with increasing evidence of an essential role for boron (B). For ETEs, there is a range of daily intake within which the organism maintains homeostasis. At intakes below this range, there is an increased risk from deficiency, and at intakes above the range toxicity may develop. Obviously, for ETEs one cannot assume zero exposure is without risk. Adequate health protection will require the cooperative effort of scientists in nutrition and toxicology to develop the limits of the accepted range for ETEs considering such unique properties of metals as bioavailability, speciation, interactions, and biokinetics.
Based on previous work by other groups and the recommendations of an IPCS consultation, a scientific monograph will be completed by IPCS. It will examine present risk assessment methodology for ETEs, and develop scientific principles supporting use of a homeostatic model for the development of dietary reference values and tolerable daily intakes. The objective is to develop an internationally accepted methodology for assessing ETEs as part of the IPCS effort to harmonize approaches to risk assessment worldwide.
A recent IPCS Task Group on Zn highlighted some of the scientific issues that require resolution to avoid an overlap of the recommended daily intake based on nutritional needs with that based on toxicity and will serve as a case study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AROI:
-
acceptable range of oral intake
- ESADDI:
-
estimated safe and adequate daily dietary intake
- EPA:
-
US Environmental Protection Agency
- ETE:
-
essential trace element
- IPCS:
-
International Program on Chemical Safety
- RfD:
-
daily reference dose
- RDA:
-
recommended daily allowances
- TDI:
-
tolerable drug intake
References
US National Research Council (NRC),Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1983).
US National Research Council (NRC),Science and Judgement in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1994).
International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS), Assessing human health risks of chemicals: derivation of guidance values for health-based exposure limits, vol. 170,World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
D. G. Barnes and M. Dourson, Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments,Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.8, 471–486 (1988).
International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS),Environmental Health Criteria, vol. 70,Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives and Contaminants in Food, World Health Organization, Geneva (1987).
World Health Organization (WHO), Trace elements in human nutrition and health, World Health Organization, Geneva (1996).
H. H. Sandstead, Zinc requirements: the recommended dietary allowance and the reference dose,Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 19, 128–131 (1993).
C. O. Abernathy, R. Contilli, J. T. Du, and D. A. Levander, Essentiality versus toxicity: some considerations in the risk assessment of essential trace elements, inHazard Assessment of Chemicals, vol. 8, J. Saxena, J. ed., Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, pp. 81–113 (1993).
G. H. Beaton, Nutrient requirements and population data,Proc. Nutr. Soc. 47, 63–78 (1988).
G. F. Nordberg and S. Skerfving, eds., Biological monitoring, carcinogenicity and risk assessment of trace elements.Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 19,Suppl. 1, 1–140 (1993).
G. C. Becking, Risk assessment for essential trace elements: a homeostatic model, inReport of an International Meeting on Zinc, 12–13 September 1996. South Australian Health Commission, Adelaide, South Australia, Adelaide, pp. 16–32 (1996).
W. Mertz, C. O. Abernathy, and S. Olin,Risk Assessment of Essential Elements, ILSI Press, Washington, DC (1994).
M. L. Dourson, Methods for establishing oral reference doses, inRisk Assessment of Essential Elements, W. Mertz, C. O. Abernathy, and S. Olin, eds., ILSI Press, Washington, DC, pp. 51–61 (1994).
R. Kroes, I. Munro, and E. Poulsen, eds., Scientific evaluation of the safety factor for the acceptable daily intake.Fd. Additives and Contaminants, vol. 10, R. Kroes, I. Munro, and E. Poulsen, eds., Taylor & Francis, London, UK, pp. 269–373 (1993).
A. G. Renwick, Data-driven safety factors for the evaluation of food additives and environmental contaminants, inFd. Additives and Contaminants, vol. 10, R. Kroes, I. Munro, and E. Poulsen, eds., Taylor & Francis, London, UK, pp. 275–303 (1993).
World Health Organization (WHO),Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2nd ed., vol. 2.Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information, World Health Organization, Geneva (1993).
US National Research Council (NRC), Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1989).
W. Mertz, Methodology for establishing recommended dietary allowances and estimated safe and adequate daily dietary intakes, inRisk Assessment of Trace Elements, W. Mertz, C. O. Abernathy, and S. Olin, eds., ILSI Press, Washington, DC, pp. 43–49 (1994).
B. A. Bowman and J. F. Risher, Comparison of the methodological approaches used in derivation of recommended dietary allowances and oral reference doses for nutritionally essential elements, inRisk Assessment of Essential Elements, W. Mertz, C. O. Abernathy, and S. Olin, eds., ILSI Press, Washington, DC, pp. 63–73 (1994).
W. Mertz, Risk assessment of essential elements.Scand. J. Work Environ. Health,19, 112, 1993.
R. Cantilli, C. O. Abernathy, and J. M. Donohue, Derivation of the reference dose for zinc, inRisk Assessment of Essential Elements, W. Mertz, C. O. Abernathy, and S. Olin, eds., ILSI Press, Washington, DC, pp. 113–125 (1994).
World Health Organization (WHO), Trace elements in human nutrition. Technical Report No. 532. World Health Organization, Geneva (1973).
M. K. Yadrick, M. A. Kenney, and E. A. Winterfeldt, Iron, copper, and zinc status: response to supplementation with zinc or zinc and iron in adult females,Am. J. Clin. Nutr.49, 145–150 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becking, G.C. The effect of essentiality on risk assessment. Biol Trace Elem Res 66, 423–438 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02783153
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02783153