Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Littoral fish assemblages of the alien-dominated Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 1980–1983 and 2001–2003

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed monthly boat electrofishing data to characterize the littoral fish assemblages of five regions of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (northern, southern, eastern, western, and central), California, during two sampling periods, 1980–1983 (1980s) and 2001–2003 (2000s), to provide information pertinent to the restoration of fish populations in this highly altered estuary. During the 1980s, almost 11,000 fish were captured, including 13 native species and 24 alien species. During the 2000s, just over 39,000 fish were captured, including 15 native species and 24 alien species. Catch per unit effort (CPUE) of total fish, alien fish, and centrarchid fish were greater in the 2000s compared with the 1980s, largely because of increased centrarchid fish CPUE. These differences in CPUE were associated with the spread of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), particularly an alien aquatic macrophyte,Egeria densa. Native fish CPUE declined from the 1980s to the 2000s, but there was no single factor that could explain the decline. Native fish were most abundant in the northern region during both sampling periods. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling indicated similar patterns of fish assemblage composition during the two sampling periods, with the northern and western regions characterized by the presence of native species. The separation of the northern and western regions from the other regions was most distinct in the 2000s. Our results suggest that native fish restoration efforts will be most successful in the northern portion of the Delta. Management decisions on the Delta should include consideration of possible effects on SAV in littoral habitats and the associated fish assemblages and ecological processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Benda, L. E., N. L. Poff, C. Tague, M. A. Palmer, J. Pizzuto, S. Cooper, E. Stanley, andG. Moglen. 2002. How to avoid train wrecks when using science in environmental problem solving.BioScience 52:1127–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. A. andP. B. Moyle. 1996. Where have all the fishes gone? Interactive factors producing fish declines in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, p. 519–542.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.) San Francisco Bay: The ecosystem, further investigations into the natural history of San Francisco Bay and Delta with reference to the influence of man. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettoli, P. W., M. J. Maciena, R. L. Noble, andR. K. Betsill. 1993. Response of a reservoir fish community to aquatic vegetation removal.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R.. 2000. Fish communities and their associations with environmental variables, lower San Joaquin River drainage, California.Environmental Biology of Fishes 57:251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. 2003a. Will tidal wetland restoration enhance populations of native fishes? p. 1–42.In L. R. Brown (ed.), issues in San Francisco Estuary Tidal Wetlands Restoration.San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Volume 1, Issue 1, Article 2. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/voll/iss1/art2.

  • Brown, L. R. 2003b. Potential effects of organic carbon production on ecosystems and drinking water, p. 1–22In L. R. Brown (ed.), Issues in San Francisco Estuary Tidal Wetlands Restoration.San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Volume 1, Issue 1, Article 3. http://repositories.cdlib.org/ jmie/sfews/voll/issl/art3.

  • Brown, L. R. andT. J. Ford. 2002. Effects of flow on the fish communities of a regulated California river: Implications for managing native fishes.Revier Research and Applications 18:331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. and J. T. May. 2006. Variation in Spring nearshore resident fish species composition and life histories in the lower Sacramento-San Joaquin Watershed and Delta.San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Volume 4, Issue 2, Article 1. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol4/iss3/artl.

  • Champion, P. D. andC. C. Tanner. 2000. Seasonality of macrophytes and interaction with flow in a New Zealand lowland stream.Hydrobiologia 441:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. Primer-E, Plymouth, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. andF. H. Nichols (eds.) 1985. Temporal Dynamics of an Estuary: San Francisco Bay. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colle, D. E., J. V. Shireman, W. T. Haller, J. C. Joyce, andD. E. Canfield, Jr. 1987. Influence of Hydrilla on harvestable sport fish populations, angler use, and angler expenditures at Orange Lake, Florida.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 7:410–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conomos, T. J. (ed.). 1979. San Francisco Bay: The urbanized estuary, investigations into the natural history of San Francisco Bay and Delta with reference to the influence of man. American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrow, R., A. V. Zale andR. W. Gregory. 1990. Distributions and abundances of early life stages of fishes in a Florida USA lake dominated by aquatic macrophytes.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119:521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. De Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O'Nell, and J. Paruelo. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature 387:253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Covich, A. 1993. Water and ecosystems. p. 40–55In P. H. Gleick (ed.), Water in Crisis: A guide to the world's fresh water resources. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, P. K., K. Whitener, and P. B. Moyle. 2004. Use of a restored central California floodplain by larvae of native and alien fishes, p. 125–140.In F. Feyrer, L. R. Brown, R. L. Brown, and J. J. Orsi (eds.), Early Life History of Fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and Watershed. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 39, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Crowder, L. B. andW. E. Cooper. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey.Ecology 63:1802–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dege, M. andL. R. Brown. 2004. Springtime distribution and abundance of larval and juvenile fishes in the upper San Francisco Estuary, p. 49–66.In F. Feyrer, L. R. Brown, R. Brown, and J. Orsi (eds.), Early Life History of Fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and Watershed, Symposium 39. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, W. A. andA. J. Cordone. 1997. History and status of introduced fishes in California, 1871–1996. Fishery Bulletin 178. California Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durocher, P. P., W. C. Provine, andJ. E. Kraai. 1984. Relationship between abundance of largemouth bass and submerged vegetation in Texas reservoirs.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 4:84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyrer, F. 2004. Ecological segregation of native and alien larval fish assemblages in the southern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, p. 67–79.In F. Feyrer, L. R. Brown, R. L. Brown, and J. J. Orsi (eds.), Early Life History of Fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and Watershed. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 39, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Feyrer, F. andM. P. Healey. 2003. Fish community structure and environmental correlates in the highly altered southern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.Environmental Biology of Fishes 66:123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, M.. 2004. Interactions between an introduced piscivore and a native piscivore in a California stream.Environmental Biology of Fishes 71:287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gocietas, V. andP. Colgan. 1987. Selection between densities of artificial vegetation by young bluegills avoiding predation.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenouillet, G., D. Pont, andJ. M. Olivier. 2000. Habitat occupancy patterns of juvenile fishes in a large lowland river. Interactions with macrophytes.Archiv Fuer Hydrobiologie 149:307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldo, L. F., R. E. Miller, C. M. Peregrin, and Z. P. Hymanson. 2004a. Spatial and temporal distribution of native and alien ichthyoplankton in three habitat types of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, p. 81–96.In R. Feyrer, L. R. Brown, R. L. Brown, and J. J. Orsi (eds.), Early Life History of Fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and Watershed. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 39, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Grimaldo, L. F., W. Kimmerer, andA. R. Stewart. 2004b Diet and carbon sources supporting fishes from open-water, edge and SAV habitats in restored freshwater wetlands of the San Francisco Estuary. M.S. Thesis, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, E. andC. Ramirez. 1986. The influence of salinity on the distribution ofEgeria densa in the Valdivia River Basin Chile.Archiv Fuer Hydrobiologie 107:511–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayse, J. W. andT. E. Wissing. 1996. Effects of stem density of artificial vegetation on abundance and growth of age-0 bluegills and predation by largemouth bass.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollibaugh, J. T. (ed.). 1996. San Francisco Bay: The ecosystem, further investigations in to the natural history of San Francisco Bay and Delta with reference to the influence of man. American Association for the Advancement of Science. San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, K. L., S. N. Luoma, andK. A. Taylor. 2003. CALFED: An experiment in science and decision making.Environment 45:30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. R. andM. K. Saiki. 1990. Estabilishment of red shiner,Notropis hutrensis, in the San Joaquin Valley, California.California Fish and Game 76:46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killcore, K. J., R. P. Morgan, II, andN. B. Rybicki. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes associated with submersed aquatic plants in the Potomac River.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, W. J. 2004. Open water processes of the San Francisco Estuary: From physical forcing to biological response,San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Volume 2, Issue 1 (February 2004), Article 1. Available: http://repositories. cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol2/iss1/artl. (27 May 2005).

  • Kimmerer, W. J., D. D. Murphy, and P. L. Angermeier. 2005. A landscape-level model for ecosystem restoration in the San Francisco Estuary and watershed.San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2005), Article 2. Available: http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol3/iss1/ art2. (27 May 2005).

  • Kruskai, J. B.. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika 29:1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B.. 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika 29:115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, S. T. andM. S. Mohr. 2003. Modeling the effect of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) on the population viability of Scaramento River winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Fishery Bulletin 101:321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, M. P. andP. B. Moyle. 2000. Spatial and temporal ecology of native and introduced larval fish in lower Putah Creek (Yolo Co. CA).Environmental Biology of Fishes 58:75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, M. P. andP. B. Moyle. 2001. Keeping alien fishes at bay: Effects of flow regime and habitat structure on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream.Ecological Applications 11:75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, P. M.. 1976. Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography. John Wiley and Sons, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J. T. andL. R. Brown. 2002. Fish community structure in relation to environmental variation within the Sacramento River Basin and implications for streams of the Central Valley, California.Environmental Biology of Fishes. 63:373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzeo, N., L. Rodriguez-Gallego, C. Kruk, M. Meerhoff, J. Gorga, G. Lacerot, F. Quintans, M. Loureiro, D. Larrea, andF. Garcia-Rodriguez. 2003. Effects ofEgeria densa Planch beds on a shallow lake without piscivorous fish.Hydrobiologia 506–509:591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. andJ. B. Grace. 2002. PC-ORD Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Brach, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, L. E. andL. L. Pugh. 1997. Relationship between vegetation coverage and abundance, size, and diet of juvenile largemouth bass during winter.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:601–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B.. 2002. Inland Fishes of California, revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B., P. K. Crain, K. Whitener, andJ. F. Mount. 2003. Alien fishes in natural streams: Fish distribution, assemblage structure, and conservation in the Cosumnes River, California, U.S.A.Environmental Biology of Fishes 68:143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nibbelink, N. P. andS. R. Carpenter. 1998. Interlake variation in growth and size structure of bluegill (Leponis macrochirus): Inverse analysis of an individual-based model.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobriga, M. L., F. Feyrer, andR. D. Baxter. 2006. Aspects of Sacramento pikeminnow biology in nearshore habitats of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. California.Western North American Naturalist 66:106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobriga, M. L., F. Feyrer, R. D. Baxter, andM. Chotkowski. 2005. Fish community ecology in an altered river delta: Spatial patterns in species composition, life history strategies, and biomass.Estuaries 28:776–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg, C. W., E. E. Werner, G. G. Mittlebach, andD. J. Hall. 1987. Growth patterns in bluegill (Leponis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) sunfish: Environmental variation and the importance of ontogenetic niche shifts.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. andP. Callow (ed.). 1996. River Biota Diversity and Dynamics. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. L.. 1996. Dividing the Waters: Food security, ecosystem Inealth, and the new politics of scarcity. Worldwatch Institute. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. L.. 2000. Entering an era of water scarcity: The challenges ahead.Ecological Applications 10:941–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. L. andS. Carpenter 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services, p. 195–214.In G. C. Daily (ed.), Nautre's Services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRIMER-E. 2005. PRIMER 6 (beta version 10). PRIMER-E. Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino, J. F. andR. A. Stein 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegils as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111:255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M.. 1999. The effect of aquatic vegetation on turbidity: How important are the filter feeders?Hydrobiologia 408–409:307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seesholtz, A., B. J. Cavallo, J. Kindopp, and R. Kurth. 2004. Juvenile fishes of the lower Feather River: Distribution. emigration patterns, and associations with environmental variables, p. 141–166.In F. Feyrer, L. R. Brown, R. L. Brown, and J. J. Orsi (eds.) Early Life History of Fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and Watershed American Fisheries Society, Symposium 39, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Sommer, T., B. Harrell, M. Nobriga, R. Brown, P. Moyle, W. Kimmerer, andL. Schemel. 2001a. California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries. wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture.Fisheries 26:6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, T., M. L. Nobriga, W. C. Harrell, W. Batham, andW. Kimmerer. 2001b. Floodplain rearing of juvenile chinook salmon: Evidence of enhanced growth and survival.Candian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E.. 1997. Striped bass (morone saxatilis) year class strength in relation to river flow in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, California.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106:34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT. 2002. SYSTAT 10.2 Statistics I. SYSTAT Software, Richmond, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. B., M. S. Allan, R. A. Meyers, E. J. Nagid, andJ. R. Estes. 2003. Relation of age-O largemouth bass abundance to Hydrilla coverage and water level at Lochloosa and Orange Lakes. Florida.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Bay Institute. 1998. From the Sierra to the Sea. The Bay Institute. San Rafael, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner J. L. andH. K. Chadwick. 1972. Distribution and abundance of young-of-the-year striped bass,Morone saxatilis, in relation to river flow in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101:442–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. L. and D. W. Kelley. 1966. Ecological studies of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Part II, fishes of the Delta. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin 136, Sacramento, California.

  • Unmuth, J. M. L. andM. J. Hansen. 1999. Effects of mechanical harvesting of Eurasian watermilfoil on largemouth bass and bluegill populations in Fish Lake, Wisconsin.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:1089–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. andD. J. Hall. 1979. Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes.Ecology 60:256–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, R. J., P. D. Champion, J. W. Nagels, andG. F. Croker. 1999. The influence of aquatic macrophytes on the hydraulic and physico-chemical properties of a New Zealand lowland stream.Hydrobiologia 416:203–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Placer Hall, 6000 J Street, 95819-6129, Sacramento, California

    Larry R. Brown

  2. California Department of Fish and Game, 4001 North Wilson Way, 95205, Stockton, California

    Dennis Michniuk

Authors
  1. Larry R. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis Michniuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry R. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, L.R., Michniuk, D. Littoral fish assemblages of the alien-dominated Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 1980–1983 and 2001–2003. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 30, 186–200 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782979

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782979

Keywords

Search

Navigation