Abstract
A certain objection to belief in God is based on the intrinsic incoherence of the concept of Divine Being or God. In particular, it questions the major traditional characteristic, notably omniscience, and its relation to omnipotence, moral unassailability, and absence of embodiment on the part of the Divine Being. In this paper, an attempt is made to counter this objection by an appeal, not to natural theology, but rather to physicalism in its application to human beings, and by extension to the possible consistency of God’s omniscience with the other divine attributes, which philosophers such as Michael Martin have found to be mutually inconsistent and therefore wanting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, suggestions and criticisms. Though I did not address all of their concerns, I hope that I have done justice to the effort they put into reviewing this essay.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beyer, J.A. A physicalist rejoinder to some problems with omniscience; Or, how god could know what we know. SOPHIA 43, 5–13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780508
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780508