Skip to main content
Log in

A physicalist rejoinder to some problems with omniscience; Or, how god could know what we know

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A certain objection to belief in God is based on the intrinsic incoherence of the concept of Divine Being or God. In particular, it questions the major traditional characteristic, notably omniscience, and its relation to omnipotence, moral unassailability, and absence of embodiment on the part of the Divine Being. In this paper, an attempt is made to counter this objection by an appeal, not to natural theology, but rather to physicalism in its application to human beings, and by extension to the possible consistency of God’s omniscience with the other divine attributes, which philosophers such as Michael Martin have found to be mutually inconsistent and therefore wanting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, suggestions and criticisms. Though I did not address all of their concerns, I hope that I have done justice to the effort they put into reviewing this essay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beyer, J.A. A physicalist rejoinder to some problems with omniscience; Or, how god could know what we know. SOPHIA 43, 5–13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780508

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780508

Keywords

Navigation