Abstract
The theologian, Bruce Malina, argued in this journal (1997) that the Bible is not relevant to economics in the contemporary world. This paper contends the contrary. A body of economists and social theologians hold that a set of consistent socio-economic principles and ethics underlying the long history of the Biblical texts can be applied to the modern world, and are so intended to apply. An assumption of this group is that the Bible depicts the word of God interpreted and ultimately written down by people in their day and age. It is the socio-economic warrants in principle contained in this material that are relevant today. The argument here has two aspects. One questions Malina, concluding that he does not sustain his conclusions. The second aspect is to illustrate something of the methodology and conclusions of the economist/social theologian group that asserts the relevance of Biblical principle to contemporary society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballard, Bruce. (1994). “On the Sin of Usury: A Biblical Economic Ethic”.Christian Scholar's Review, 24: 210–228.
Bartholomew, Craig, Coline Greene and Karl Moller. eds. (2000).Renewing Biblical Interpretation. Carlisle/Grand Rapids: Paternoster/Zondervan.
Barton, John. ed. (1998).The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cairns, I. (1992)Word and Presence: A Commentary on the Book of Deuteronomy. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Elliott, John. (2001). “On Wooing Crocodiles for Fun and Profit: Confessions of an Intact Admirer”. John Pilch, ed.Social Scientific Models for Interpreting the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 5–20.
Finley, Moses. (1985).The Ancient Economy. London: Hogarth.
Forrester, Duncan. (2001).On Human Worth: A Christian Vindication of Equality. London: SCM.
Gutierrez, Gustavo. (1974).A Theology of Liberation. London: SCM.
—. (1983).The Power of the Poor in History. London: SCM.
Hands, Wade. (2001).Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, Donald. (1989).Economics Today: A Christian Critique. Leicester: Apollos.
Kaiser Jr., Walter. (1983).Toward Old Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
Malina, Bruce. (1987). “Wealth and Poverty in the New Testament World”.Interpretation, 41, 4: 354–367.
—. (1996).The Social World of Jesus and the Gospels. London: Routledge.
—. (1997). “Embedded Economics: The Irrelevance of Christian Fictive Domestic Economy”,Forum for Social Economics, 26, 2: 1–20.
—. (2001).The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology 3rd ed. rev. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.
Malina, Bruce and Richard Rohrbaugh. (1992).Social Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Mason, John. (1987). “Biblical Teaching and Assisting the Poor”.Transformation, 4, 2: 1–14.
—. (1996). “Biblical Teaching and the Objectives of Welfare Policy in the United States”. Stanley Carlson-Thies and James Skillen, eds.Welfare in America. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 145–185.
Massaro, Thomas. (1998).Catholic Social Teaching and United States Welfare Reform. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.
May, Herbert, and Bruce Metzger, eds. (1977)The New Oxford Annotated Bible with The Apocrypha. Revised Standard Version. New York: Oxford University Press.
McKee, Arnold. (1987).Economics and the Christian Mind. New York: Vantage.
Meeks, Douglas. (1989).God the Economist. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Mills, Paul and J. Presley. (1999).Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice Houndmills: Macmillan.
Niedercorn, John. (1985). “Two Biblical Conceptions of an Equitable and Efficient Economy”.Review of Social Economy, 43, 2: 181–192.
Oakman, Douglas. (2001). “Models and Archaeology in the Social Interpretation of Jesus”. John Pilch, ed.Social Scientific Models for Interpreting the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 102–131.
O'Boyle, Edward. (1998).Personalist Economics. Boston: Kluwer.
Rae, Scott. (2002). “Views of Wealth in the Bible and the Ancient World”.Religion and Liberty, 12, 6: 6–7.
Rohrbaugh, Richard. (1993). “A Peasant Reading of the Parable of the Tealents/Pounds: A Text of Terror?”,Biblical Theology Bulletin, 23: 32–39.
—. (1996).The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation. Hendrickson: Peabody.
Sloan, Robert. (1999). “Canonical Theology of the New Testament”. David Dockery, Kenneth Mathews, Robert Sloan, eds.Foundations for Biblical Interpretation. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 565–594.
Stapleford, John. (2002)Bulls, Bears and Golden Calves: Applying Christian Ethics in Economics. Downers Grove: Inter Varsity Press.
Tiemstra, John, Fred Graham, George Monsma, Carl Sinke, and Alan Storkey. (1990).Reforming Economics: Calvinist Studies on Methods and Institutions. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.
Tigay, J. (1996).The JPS Torah Commentary: Deuteronomy. Philadelphia: Jewish Publications Society.
Wilber, Charles. (1998). “John Paul II, Catholic Social Thought and the Ethics of Consumption”,International Journal of Social Economics, 25, 11–12: 1595–1607.
Wright, Christopher. (1990).God's People in God's Land. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
—. (1995),Walking in the Ways of the Lord. Leicester: Apollos.
—. (1996).New International Biblical Commentary: Deuteronomy. Peabody: Hendrickson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beed, C. The relevance of christian fictive domestic economy. FSSE 32, 23–39 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779077
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779077