Skip to main content
Log in

The relevance of christian fictive domestic economy

  • Published:
Forum for Social Economics

Abstract

The theologian, Bruce Malina, argued in this journal (1997) that the Bible is not relevant to economics in the contemporary world. This paper contends the contrary. A body of economists and social theologians hold that a set of consistent socio-economic principles and ethics underlying the long history of the Biblical texts can be applied to the modern world, and are so intended to apply. An assumption of this group is that the Bible depicts the word of God interpreted and ultimately written down by people in their day and age. It is the socio-economic warrants in principle contained in this material that are relevant today. The argument here has two aspects. One questions Malina, concluding that he does not sustain his conclusions. The second aspect is to illustrate something of the methodology and conclusions of the economist/social theologian group that asserts the relevance of Biblical principle to contemporary society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard, Bruce. (1994). “On the Sin of Usury: A Biblical Economic Ethic”.Christian Scholar's Review, 24: 210–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, Craig, Coline Greene and Karl Moller. eds. (2000).Renewing Biblical Interpretation. Carlisle/Grand Rapids: Paternoster/Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, John. ed. (1998).The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, I. (1992)Word and Presence: A Commentary on the Book of Deuteronomy. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, John. (2001). “On Wooing Crocodiles for Fun and Profit: Confessions of an Intact Admirer”. John Pilch, ed.Social Scientific Models for Interpreting the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, Moses. (1985).The Ancient Economy. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Duncan. (2001).On Human Worth: A Christian Vindication of Equality. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, Gustavo. (1974).A Theology of Liberation. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1983).The Power of the Poor in History. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, Wade. (2001).Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Donald. (1989).Economics Today: A Christian Critique. Leicester: Apollos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Jr., Walter. (1983).Toward Old Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malina, Bruce. (1987). “Wealth and Poverty in the New Testament World”.Interpretation, 41, 4: 354–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1996).The Social World of Jesus and the Gospels. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1997). “Embedded Economics: The Irrelevance of Christian Fictive Domestic Economy”,Forum for Social Economics, 26, 2: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2001).The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology 3rd ed. rev. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malina, Bruce and Richard Rohrbaugh. (1992).Social Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, John. (1987). “Biblical Teaching and Assisting the Poor”.Transformation, 4, 2: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1996). “Biblical Teaching and the Objectives of Welfare Policy in the United States”. Stanley Carlson-Thies and James Skillen, eds.Welfare in America. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 145–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, Thomas. (1998).Catholic Social Teaching and United States Welfare Reform. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Herbert, and Bruce Metzger, eds. (1977)The New Oxford Annotated Bible with The Apocrypha. Revised Standard Version. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, Arnold. (1987).Economics and the Christian Mind. New York: Vantage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, Douglas. (1989).God the Economist. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Paul and J. Presley. (1999).Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedercorn, John. (1985). “Two Biblical Conceptions of an Equitable and Efficient Economy”.Review of Social Economy, 43, 2: 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakman, Douglas. (2001). “Models and Archaeology in the Social Interpretation of Jesus”. John Pilch, ed.Social Scientific Models for Interpreting the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 102–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Boyle, Edward. (1998).Personalist Economics. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Scott. (2002). “Views of Wealth in the Bible and the Ancient World”.Religion and Liberty, 12, 6: 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, Richard. (1993). “A Peasant Reading of the Parable of the Tealents/Pounds: A Text of Terror?”,Biblical Theology Bulletin, 23: 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1996).The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation. Hendrickson: Peabody.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Robert. (1999). “Canonical Theology of the New Testament”. David Dockery, Kenneth Mathews, Robert Sloan, eds.Foundations for Biblical Interpretation. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 565–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleford, John. (2002)Bulls, Bears and Golden Calves: Applying Christian Ethics in Economics. Downers Grove: Inter Varsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemstra, John, Fred Graham, George Monsma, Carl Sinke, and Alan Storkey. (1990).Reforming Economics: Calvinist Studies on Methods and Institutions. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigay, J. (1996).The JPS Torah Commentary: Deuteronomy. Philadelphia: Jewish Publications Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, Charles. (1998). “John Paul II, Catholic Social Thought and the Ethics of Consumption”,International Journal of Social Economics, 25, 11–12: 1595–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Christopher. (1990).God's People in God's Land. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1995),Walking in the Ways of the Lord. Leicester: Apollos.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1996).New International Biblical Commentary: Deuteronomy. Peabody: Hendrickson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beed, C. The relevance of christian fictive domestic economy. FSSE 32, 23–39 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779077

Keywords

Navigation