Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are economists amoral? Contemporary economic thought and the distinction between values and prices

  • Published:
Forum for Social Economics

Abstract

Underlying the “clash of cultures” between economists and the rest of the citizenry is a way of thinking about rationality, consumer choice and policy that periodically reveals a confusion between values and prices on the side of economists. Lawrence Summers' famous memo on the underpollution of the Third World was a case in point. Sadly, this was not an isolated incident. On the contrary, mainstream economists are conditioned, by the categories they employ, to regularly conflate value with price. This is particularly the case when it comes to theorizing about consumer choice and the meaning(s) to be ascribed to the set of market prices that emerge from the aggregate of these choices. This paper explores the dimensions of the problem and suggests other frameworks of choice that can enrich our understanding of consumer behavior and the significance of the set of prices that emerge in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. (February 7, 1992). “Furor On Memo At World Bank.”New York Times, D2.

  • Arestis, Philip. (1992).The Post-Keynesian Approach to Economics. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Michael A. (2001).A Perilous Progress: Economists and the Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Carl, and George Stigler. (March 1977). “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.”American Economic Review, 67, 2: 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Ruth, ed. (1997).Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. (1992). “Why Do People Want Goods?” Shaun Hargreaves Heap and Angus Ross, eds.,Understanding the Enterprise Culture: Themes in the Work of Mary Douglas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. (1959).The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. (1939).Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (March 2003). “The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 2: 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Marc (1992).Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, Harvey. (May 1950). “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer's Demand.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 2: 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, David P. (1988).Needs, Rights, and the Market. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Mark and Kenneth Lux. (1979).The Challenge of Humanistic Economics. Reading MA: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, Oskar. (February 1940). “Demand theory Reconsidered.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62, 2: 165–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001). “The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Matthew D. Adler and Eric A. Posner, eds.,Cost-Benefit Analysis: Economic, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasch, Robert. (1998). “Alternative Theories of Price: Classical, Neoclassical, and Post-Keynesian.” Unpublished Manuscript, Middlebury College Economics Department.

  • —. (June 2003). “Technical Change, Competition, and the Poor.”Journal of Economic Issues, 37, 2: 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. (1999).Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George. (1982).The Economist as Preacher, and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styron, William. (1979).Sophie's Choice. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, Jerold. (2000).The Politics of the Minimum Wage. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopt. (February 10, 1992). “World Bank Official's Irony Backfires.”Washington Post, A9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middlebury College, Middlebury, USA

    Robert E. Prasch

Authors
  1. Robert E. Prasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Thanks go to Falguni A. Sheth, Kevin McCarron and the audience at the Association for Social Economics Annual Meetings, Washington, D.C., 2003 where an earlier version of this paper was presented.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prasch, R.E. Are economists amoral? Contemporary economic thought and the distinction between values and prices. FSSE 32, 13–22 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779076

Keywords

Search

Navigation