Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ranking of liver tests for differential diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gastroenterologia Japonica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Liver function tests were ranked in the order useful to differentiate 8 liver parenchymal diseases in combination of tests by forward selection and backward elimination procedures in the likelihood method using a microcomputer. The orders were almost same in both procedures: indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate, glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT), zinc turbidity test, alkaline phosphatase, age, HBsAg, RA test, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT)/GPT ratio, GOT, cholesterol, total protein, total bilirubin, albumin/globulin ratio and γ-globulin. The first 9 tests had almost all informations of all tests. The first likelihood diagnosis using the 9 tests was correct in 53% and the first or the second diagnosis was correct in 71 % of 444 cases of 8 liver parenchymal diseases. A score table of likelihood diagnosis using the 9 tests was presented for manual application to new cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Itoshima T, et al: Differential diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases by likelihood method using 12 laboratory data and age. Gastroenterol Jpn 17: 453, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramsoe K, et al: The redundancy of liver tests in the diagnosis of cirrhosis estimated by multivariate statistics. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 26: 307, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Solberg HE, et al: Diagnosis of liver diseases by laboratory results and discriminant analysis. Identification of best combinations of laboratory tests. Scand J Lab Invest 35: 713, 1975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winkel P, et al: Diagnostic value of routine liver tests. Clin Chem 21:71, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Plomeux G, et al: Traitement statistique des donnes biochimiques par la methode d’analyse discriminante. Selection des variables biochimiques discriminantes. Essai de discrimination biochimique de la cholostase intrahepatique de l’obstacle extrahepatique et du cancer du foie. Ann Biol Clin 33: 411, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sher PP: Diagnostic effectiveness of biochemical liver function tests, as evaluated by discriminant function analysis. Clin Chem 23: 627, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nulius R: Beitrag multivariater discriminanzanalytischer Rechenverfahren zur Aussage klinisch chemischer Parameter bei Leber und Gallenwegserkrankungen. Z Gesamte Inn Med 32: 50, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  8. Itoshima T, et al: Computer diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Rinshobyori (Tokyo) 21: 529, 1973 (Japanese text)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Osaki H, et al: Computer program of forward selection and backward elimination procedure in multiple regression analysis. Memoirs of the School of Engineering Okayama University 9: 89, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton M: A simple discriminant function for hepatic disease. J Clin Path 30: 454, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Itoshima, T., Kawaguchi, K., Morichika, S. et al. Ranking of liver tests for differential diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Gastroenterol Jpn 18, 109–113 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02774684

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02774684

Key words

Navigation