Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of fibergastroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: A study of 339 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gastroenterologia Japonica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three hundred and sixty-five biopsies under direct vision, using a fibergastroscope, were performed on 339 patients with gastric cancer from 1966 to 1975.

Diagnostic accuracy improved with an increased in the number of biopsy specimens and reached 100% when 6 or more biopsy specimens were obtained.

Positive specimens were obtained with 48.5% of the biopsied tissue from the center of the lesion (A), 52.2% from the inner margin of the lesion (B1), 19.6% from the outer margin of the lesion (B2), and 1.6% from the area around the lesion (C). The combined result of the biopsies from A and B1 was highly positive in 49 out of 51 cases (96.1%).

Diagnostic accuracy of the early cancer reached 96.9%. This was significantly higher than that of advanced cancer (80.3%).

False negative biopsies were found in 51 (16.3%) of the 313 patients who were gastrectomized and diagnosed by histological examinations. Twenty-three of the 27 patients, who were diagnosed as benign either by x-ray or endoscopie examination, and 4 of the 5 patients who were diagnosed as benign under both examinations, were found to have positive results by biopsy. Positive biopsy examination was particularly helpful with patients showing on inconclusive or benign diagnosis by x-ray and/or endoscopie examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirschowitz BI, et al: Demonstration of a new gastroscope, the “Fiberscope”. Gastroenterology 35: 50, 1958

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Takemoto T, et al: The diagnosis of early gastric cancer through fibergastroscopic biopsy, in Gann monograph on cancer research 11, “Early Gastric Cancer” edited by Murakami T, Tokyo University Press p 233, 1971

  3. Kasugai T, Kobayashi S: Evaluation of biopsy and cytology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Am J Gastronent 62: 199, 1974

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatefield ARW, et al: Importance of the site of endoscopie gastric biopsy in ulcerating lesions of the stomach. Gut 16: 884, 1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Witzel L, et al: Evaluation of specific value of endoscopie biopsies and brush cytology for malignancies of the oesophagus and stomach. Gut 17: 375, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurokawa T, Fuchigami A, Takagi K, Misumi A: Fibergastroscopic biopsy under direct vision. J Clin Dig Dis 6: 927, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  7. Misumi A: Histopathological and histochemical study on the postoperative gastric mucosa after gastectomy; With biopsy materials obtained from human stomach. J Kumamoto Med Soc 41: 539, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suzuki Y, Ogoshi K, et al: Studies on false negative cases with gastric cancer in gastric biopsy. J Cancer Center Niigata 14: 31, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akagi M, Motoyama H, Misumi A, et al: Enzyme histochemical studies of biopsy specimens for diagnosis of gastric cancer. Stomach and Intestine 2: 11, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gregg LA, et al: Gastric cancer; direct vision biopsy and abrasive cytology. Am J Gastroent 59: 401, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fung WP, Lee S-K, Diagnosis of gastric prepyloric and antral lesions; Complication of fiberendoscopy and gastric biopsy with radiology. Am J Gastroent 66: 530, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Misumi, A., Mori, K., Ikeda, T. et al. Evaluation of fibergastroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: A study of 339 cases. Gastroenterol Jpn 13, 255–263 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02774048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02774048

Key Words

Navigation