Skip to main content
Log in

Gap forcing

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I generalize the landmark Lévy-Solovay Theorem [LévSol67], which limits the kind of large cardinal embeddings that can exist in a small forcing extension, to a broad new class of forcing notions, a class that includes many of the forcing iterations most commonly found in the large cardinal literature. After such forcing, the fact is that every embedding satisfying a mild closure requirement lifts an embedding from the ground model. Such forcing, consequently, can create no new weakly compact cardinals, measurable cardinals, strong cardinals, Woodin cardinals, strongly compact cardinals, supercompact cardinals, almost huge cardinals, or huge cardinals, and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. D. Hamkins,Canonical seeds and Prikry trees, Journal of Symbolic Logic62 (1997), 373–396.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. D. Hamkins,Destruction or preservation as you like it, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic91 (1998), 191–229.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Hamkins,Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible, Journal of Symbolic Logic63 (1998), 51–58.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. D. Hamkins and S. Shelah,Superdestructibility: a dual to the Laver preparation, Journal of Symbolic Logic63 (1998), 549–554.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. Hamkins,Gap forcing: generalizing the Lévy-Solovay theorem, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic5 (1999), 264–272.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. D. Hamkins and W. H. Woodin,Small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society128 (2000), 3025–3029.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Laver,Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics29 (1978), 385–388.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Lévy and R. M. Solovay,Measurable cardinals and the Continuum Hypothesis, Israel Journal of Mathematics5 (1967), 234–248.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Mitchell,Aronszajn trees and the independence property, Annals of Mathematical Logic5 (1972-73), 21–46.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. S. Scott,Measurable cardinals and constructible sets, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Mathematics9 (1961), 521–524.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Silver,The Consistency of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis with the existence of a Measurable Cardinal, inAxiomatica Set Theory (D. Scott, ed.), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics13 (1971), 383–390.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel David Hamkins.

Additional information

My research has been supported in part by grants from the PSC-CUNY Research Foundation and from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. I would like to thank my gracious hosts at Kobe University in Japan for their generous hospitality. This paper follows up an earlier announcement of the main theorem appearing, without technical details, in [Ham99].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamkins, J.D. Gap forcing. Isr. J. Math. 125, 237–252 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773382

Keywords

Navigation