Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of cocycles of generic equivalence relations

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study cocycles of an ergodic generic countable equivalence relation ℜ modulo meager sets. Two cocycles of ℜ are called weakly equivalent if they are cohomologous up to an element of Aut ℜ. It is proved that two nontransient cocycles with values in an arbitrary countable group are weakly equivalent if and only if their generic Mackey actions are isomorphic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Bezuglyi,Groups of automorphisms of measure space and weak equivalence of cocycles, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series,277, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bezuglyi and V. Golodets,Weak equivalence and the structure of cocycles of an ergodic automorphism, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences of Kyoto University27 (1991), 577–625.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Connes, J. Feldman and B. Weiss,An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems1 (1981), 431–450.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Danilenko,Quasinormal subrelations of ergodic equivalence relations, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society126 (1998), 3361–3370.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Golodets, V. Kulagin and S. Sinel’shchikov,Orbit properties of pseudo-homeomorphism groups and their cocycles, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series,277, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Golodets and V. Kulagin,Weak equivalence of cocycles and Mackey action in generic dynamics, Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems4 (2003), 39–57.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Golodets and S. Sinel’shchikov,Classification and structure of cocycles of amenable ergodic equivalence relations, Journal of Functional Analysis121 (1994), 455–485.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Golodets and S. Sinel’shchikov,Amenable ergodic actions of groups and images of cocycles, Soviet Mathematics Doklady41 (1990), 523–526.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Golodets and S. Sinel’shchikov,Outer conjugacy for actions of continuous amenable groups, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences of Kyoto University23 (1987), 737–769.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Kechris,Descriptive Dynamics, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series,277, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 231–258.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kechris,Classical Descriptive Set Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,156, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Kechris and B. Miller,Topics in Orbit Equivalence, Lecture Notes in Mathematics1852, Springer, Berlin, 2004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Krieger,On ergodic flows and isomorphism of factors, Mathematische Annalen223 (1976), 19–70.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Kuratowski,Topology, Academic Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Mackey,Ergodic theory and virtual groups, Mathematische Annalen166 (1966), 187–207.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Ramsay,The Mackey-Glimm dichotomy for foliations and other Polish groupoids, Journal of Functional Analysis94 (1990), 358–374.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Schmidt,Cocycles of Ergodic Transformation Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics1, MacMillan of India, New Delhi, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Schmidt,Algebraic Ideas in Ergodic Theory, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics,76, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Sullivan, B. Weiss and J. D. M. Wright,Generic dynamics and monotone complete C*-algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society295 (1986), 795–809.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Weiss,A survey of generic dynamics, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series,277, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Zimmer,Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulagin, V. Classification of cocycles of generic equivalence relations. Isr. J. Math. 152, 83–104 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771977

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771977

Keywords

Navigation