Skip to main content
Log in

Developing and validating learning hierarchies

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Airasian, P. W. A method for validating sequential instructional hierarchies.Educational Technology, December 1971,11, 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (Ed.)Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B., Hastings, J., & Madaus, G.Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGrawHill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boozer, R., & Lindvall, C. An investigation of selected procedures for the development and evaluation of hierarchical curriculum structures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, 1971.

  • Briggs, L.Sequencing of instruction in relation to hierarchies of competence. Pittsburgh: American Institutes for Research, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L.Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction. Pittsburgh: American Institutes for Research, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capie, W., & Jones, H. An assessment of hierarchy validation techniques.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971,8, 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiel, R. An investigation of the effectiveness of formative evaluation and remediation in achieving mastery of intellectual skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1972.

  • Gagné, R. M. The acquisition of knowledge.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. Curriculum research and the promotion of learning. In B. O. Smith (Ed.),Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. Learning hierarchies.Educational Psychologist, November 1968, 6, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M.The conditions of learning. (2nd ed.)New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Mayor, J. R., Garstens, H. L., & Paradise, N. E. Factors in acquiring knowledge of a mathematical task.Psychological Monographs, 1962,76, 7, (Whole No. 526).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. Psychological bases for instructional design.AV Communication Review, 1966,14, 433–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. A method of scalogram analysis using summary statistics.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. A basis for scaling quantitative data.American Sociological Review IX, 1944, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, C. M., & Cox, R. C. The role of evaluation in programs for individualized instruction. In R. Tyler (Ed.),Educational evaluation: New roles, new means. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, D. G. An exercise in the application of empirical methods to instructional systems design. Final Report AIR-E81-4/67-FR. Palo Alto, Calif.: American Institutes for Research, April 1967.

  • Merrill, M. D. Content and instructional analysis for cognitive transfer tasks.AV Communication Review, 1973,21, 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okey, J. R. Developing competence in process skills. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D. C, March 1971.

  • Okey, J. R., & Gagne, R. M. Revision of a science topic using evidence of performance on subordinate skills.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971,7, 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. The development of the concept of displacement volume: A hierarchical model and its partial testing under two methods of presentation.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971,8, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. Design of an early learning curriculum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, December 1967.

  • Resnick, L., & Wang, M. Approaches to the validation of learning hierarchies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center, June 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L., Wang, M., & Kaplan, J. Behavior analysis in curriculum design: A hierarchically sequenced introductory mathematics curriculum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, December 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D., & Boutwell, R. C. A quality control design for validating hierarchical sequencing of programmed instruction.NSPI Journal, May 1971,10, 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twelker, P. A. Designing instructional systems. In J. Crawford (Ed.),CORD national research training manual. Monmouth, Ore.: Oregon State System of Higher Education, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbesser, H. H. A hierarchically based test battery for assessing scientific inquiry. Paper read at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, 1968.

  • Walbesser, H., & Carter, H. Acquisition of elementary science behavior by children of disadvantaged families.Educational Leadership, 1968,26, 741–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, V. A study of subordinate skills in science problem solving. In R. Gagne (Ed.),Basic studies of learning hierarchies in school subjects. Final Report, Project No. 6–2949, U.S. Office of Education, April 1970.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okey, J.R. Developing and validating learning hierarchies. AVCR 21, 87–108 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770830

Keywords

Navigation