Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learner analysis

Some process and content concerns

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. L.A concept of corporate planning.New York: Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. L., & Schutz, R. E. (Eds.)Instructional product development. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971. P. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. Aptitude-treatment interactions in two studies of learning from lecture instruction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York City, February 1971.

  • Berliner, D. C., & Cahen, L. S. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.),Review of research in education. Itasca, 111.:F. E. Peacock, 1973, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, M. L. & Naylor, J. C.Industrial psychology. (3rd ed.) New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. J.Sequencing of instruction in relation to hierarchies of competence. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institute for Research, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. J.Handbook of procedures for design of instruction. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. S., & Schwen, T. M. Beyond the remedial loop: Toward the integration of task and learner analysis for a process approach to instructional development. ERIC Document # 049599, 1971.

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959,56, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. L., & Hopkins, J. E.A report on educational research and development and diffusion manpower, 1967-1974. Bloomington, Ind.:Indiana University Research Foundation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. Pre-decisional information search as a function of subjective response uncertainty, importance, cognition and locus of control. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University, 1970.

  • Cox, R. C., & Graham, G. T. The development of a sequentially scaled achievement test.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1966,3, 147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. Two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1957, 2, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C.Psychological tests and personnel decisions. (2nd ed.) Urbana, 111.: University of Illinois Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. Individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables. U.S. Office of Education Final Report No. OEC 4-6-061269-1217, March 1969.

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (Eds.)Research for tomorrow’s schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. London: Macmillan, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K. Task analysis: Some process and content concerns.A V Communication Review, 1973,21, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K., & Schwen, T. (Eds.) Toward a definition of instructional development. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Division of Instructional Development Monograph, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiVesta, F. J., Peters, D. R., Sanders, N. M., Schultz, C. B., & Weener, P. D.Instructional Strategies;Multivariable studies of psychological processes related to instruction. Annual report, Part I, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Order No. 1269, ONR Contract No. N00014-67-A-0385-0066. Pennsylvania State University, Department of Educational Psychology, July 1970.

  • Dowaliby, F. J., & Berliner, D. C. ANALTI: A computer program for the application of the Johnson-Newman technique in the case of one predictor and one criterion variable. Amherst, Mass.: Technical Report N. 15, Center for Educational Research, School of Education, University of Massachusetts, November 1971.

  • Faris, K. G. Would you believe an instructional developer?Audiovisual Instruction, 1968, 23(9), 971–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, N. Toward a taxonomy of situations.American Psychologist, 1972,27, 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Gropper, G. L.Individual differences in learning from visual and verbal presentations. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research: Studies in Filmed Instruction, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. Praxeonomy: A systematic approach to identifying training needs. In I. K. Davies & J. Hartley (Eds.),Contributions to an educational technology. London: Butterworth, 1972. P.294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., & Resnick, L. B. Instructional psychology. In P. H. Mussen & M. P. Rosenzwerg (Eds.),Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. Student personality characteristics and optimal college learning conditions: An extensive search for trait-bytreatment interaction effects.Instructional Science, July 1972, 2(2), 153–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M.Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P.Psychometric methods.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamreus, D. G. The systems approach to instructional development. InThe contributions of behavioral science to instructional technology. Monmouth, Ore.: Oregon Higher Education Commission, Teaching Research Division, Undated.

  • Light, J. A., & Reynolds, L. J. In T. M. Schwen (Ed.), Debugging product and testing errors: Procedures for the formative evaluation of an individualized mathematics curriculum.Viewpoints (Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University), July 1972, 48(4), 45–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, T. A., & England, G. W. Efficiency and accuracy of employer decision rules.Personnel Psychology, 1965,18, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A. W. Individual differences and theoretical process variables: General comments on the process. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. Content and instructional analysis for cognitive tasks.AV Communication Review, 1973,21, 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. The criterion problem in the evaluation of instruction: Assessing possible, not just probable outcomes. In M. C. Wittrock & D. E. Wiley (Eds.),The evaluation of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H.Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., & Shine, L. C.. A table for determining the increase in mean criterion score obtained by using a selection device.Journal of Industrial Psychology, 1965, 3, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okey, J. R. Developing and validating learning hierarchies.AV Communication Review, 1973,21, 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (Ed.)Criterion-referenced measurement: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhetts, J. E. In L. Sperry (Ed.),Learning performance and individual differences: Essays and readings. Glenview, I11.:Scott Foresman, 1972. Pp. 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G., Hoffman, R. J., LaForge, G. E., & Hsieh, K. Optimal cutting scores to discriminate groups of unequal size and variance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966,50, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. What does it do to Johnny? In G. Salomon & R. E. Snow (Eds.), Commentaries on research in instructional media: An examination of conceptual schemes.Viewpoints (Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University), 1970,46(5), 119–136.

  • Salomon, G. Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude-treatment interaction hypotheses.Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42(3), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E. A paradigm of experimental modification of the effects of test anxiety or cognitive processes.American Educational Research Journal, 1969, 6(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. Research on media and aptitudes. In G. Salomon & R. E. Snow (Eds.), Commentaries on research in instructional media: An examination of conceptual schemes.Viewpoints (Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University), 1970, 46(5), 63–91.

  • Stallings, J. A., & Keeps, B. D.Student aptitudes and methods of teaching beginning reading. A predictive instrument for determining interaction patterns. Final Report, OEG-9-70-0005, Project No. 9-I-099, U.S. Office of Education, Bureau of Research, 1970.

  • Starr, M. K.Management: A modern approach.New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. C., & Russell, J. T. The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1939,23, 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosti, D. T., & Harmon, P. N. The management of instruction.AV Communication Review, 1973,21, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Audio-Visual Center, Indiana University, 47401, Bloomington, Indiana

    Thomas M. Schwen (assistant professor of education and director of development and special projects)

Authors
  1. Thomas M. Schwen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwen, T.M. Learner analysis. AVCR 21, 44–72 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770828

Keywords

Search

Navigation