Skip to main content
Log in

The management of instruction

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper has described a new conceptual model of instructional management that has found utility in the analysis and design of the instructional components in educational systems of varying complexity.

In the opinion of the authors, it is likely that a revolution in the quality of education will not come from the availability of new media, the introduction of any specific devices like the computer or teaching machine, the introduction of improved evaluation methods, the specification of behavior objectives, or the development of effective motivational subsystems, although all of these will, in their way, contribute. Instead, a radical change in the quality of American education will come from the increased application of the growing body of knowledge about the form, purpose, and processes involved in instructional decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayllon, T., & Nathan, A.The token economy. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, P. Curriculum cost-effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript, 1969.

  • Homme, L. E., & Tosti, D. T. Contingency management and motivation.NSPI Journal, 1965,4, 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. Neglected rewards in the educational process. Paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the American Conference of Academic Deans at Los Angeles, California, January 16, 1967.

  • Tosti, D. T., & Ball, J. R. A behavioral approach to instructional design and media selection.AW Communication Review, 1969, 27, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti, D. T., & Loehr, J. Antecedents of contingency management.Educational Technology, 1971, 11(4), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Bibliography

  • Bech, N. H., & Csanyi, A. Junior college demonstration project. Final report. Westinghouse Learning Corporation, Behavior Systems Division, 1968.

  • Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. R.Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogswell, J. F., Estavan, D. P., et al. Final report: Exploratory study of information-processing procedures and computerbased technology in vocational counseling. Systems Development Corp. Document TM-3718/000/00, October 26,1967.

  • Geis, G., & Chapman, R. Knowledge of results and other possible reinforcers in self-instructional systems.Educational Technology, 1971, 11(11), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. Advantages of individualized instruction. Paper presented at the National Society of Programmed Instruction, 1968.

  • Rhode, W., Esseff, P., Pusin, C, Quirk, F., & Shilik, R. Analysis and approach to the development of an advanced multi-media instructional system. Wright-Patterson AFP: AFHRL-TR-69-30, Vol. 1,1970.

  • Tosti, D. T. (principal investigator). An observation and analysis of instructional management in project PLAN classrooms. Westinghouse Learning Corporation, 1968.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tosti, D.T., Harmon, N.P. The management of instruction. AVCR 21, 31–43 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770827

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770827

Keywords

Navigation