Skip to main content
Log in

Embedded economics: The irrelevance of Christian fictive domestic economy

  • Symposium The Relationship Between Religion and Economics: Views From Beyond The Profession
  • Published:
Forum for Social Economics

Abstract

When reading the New Testament, the modern historically-minded interpreter would do well to keep in view that early Christian traditions emerged in the advanced agrarian societies of the first-century, eastern Mediterranean. In these societies, kinship and political institutions, roles, and norms determined economic and religious institutional behavior. That is, religious and economic structures were always embedded in either the kin group or the political group. Hence, to understand the “economic” assumptions and behaviors described in the New Testament, the interpreter must develop scenarios that fit the document’s historical and social context; the alternative is a necessarily anachronistic and ethnocentric reading. This essay articulates some basic perspectives entailed in historically and culturally sensitive interpretations of Old Testament and New Testament passages dealing with “economics”. The methodology employed here is a broadly based “social scientific criticism,” focusing on reading theory and cultural anthropology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard, B. (1994). “On the Sin of Usury: A Biblical Economic Ethic.”Christian Scholars' Review. 24: 210–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, David L. (1995).New Testament Story: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, Thomas F. (1973).The Economies of Antiquity. Lawrence, KS: Coronado.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1975).The Shape of the Past: Models and Antiquity. Lawrence, KS: Coronado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Ronald W. (1983). “Schemata in Cognitive Anthropology.”Annual Review of Anthropology. 12: 429–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley, Moses I. (1973).The Ancient Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. (1967).Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Edward T. (1976).Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1983).The Dance of Life: The Other Dimensions of Time. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Michael A.K. (1978).Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Gildas. (1990).Poverty and Charity in Roman Palestine: First Three Centuries C.E. University of California Publications: Near Eastern Studies 23. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, S.E. and H.H. Clark. (1974). “What’s New? Acquiring New Information As a Process in Comprehension.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 13: 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronemer, Alexander. (January 28, 1997). “The Bible as a Model for Democracy: Was Socrates More of a Bolshevik?”Christian Science Monitor 89, no 43: 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malina, Bruce J. (1986a).Christian Origins and Cultural Anthropology: Practical Models for Biblical Interpretation. Atlanta: John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986b). “Interpreting the Bible with Anthropology: The Question of Poor and Rich.”Listening. 21: 148–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987). “Wealth and Poverty in the New Testament and Its World.”Interpretation. 41: 354–367. Reprinted as “Wealth and Poverty in the New Testament World.” Max L. Stackhouse, Dennis P. McCann, Shirley J. Roels and Preson N. Williams, eds. (1995).On Moral Business: Classical and Contemporary Resources for Ethics in Economic Life. Grand Rapids: Eerdman, 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991). “Reading Theory Perspective: Reading Luke-Acts.” Jerome H. Neyrey, ed.The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 3–23. Reprinted as “Reading Theory Perspectives.” Bruce J. Malina. (1996).The Social World of Jesus and the Gospels. London/New York: Routledge, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1993).The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Rev. ed. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996a). “Mediterranean Sacrifice: Dimensions of Domestic and Political Religion.”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 26: 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1996b). “Social Scientific Criticism and Rhetorical Criticism: Why Won't Romanticism leave Us Alone?” Stanley E. Porter and Thomas H. Olbricht, eds.Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Protoria Conference. (JSNT Sup) Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. 71–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Bonnie J.F. and G. Elizabeth Rice. (1984). “The Structure of Text.” P. David Pearson. ed.Handbook of Reading Research, New York: Longman. 319–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxnes, Halvor. (1987). “The Economy in the Gospel of Luke in Light of Social Anthropology.” Halvor Moxnes, ed.Economy in the New Testament. Urkristendommen: Prosjektshefte 2. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1988).The Economy of the Kingdom: Social Conflict and Economic Interaction in Luke’s Gospel. Overtures to Biblical Theology. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedercorn, John H. (1985). “Two Biblical Conceptions of an Equitable and Efficient Economy.”Review of Social Economy. XLIII, 2: 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakman, Douglas E. (1986).Jesus and the Economic Questions of His Day. Lewiston NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991a). “The Countryside in Luke-Acts.” Jerome H. Neyrey, ed.The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson. 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991b). “BTB Readers Guide: The Ancient Economy in the Bible.”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 21: 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1992). “Was Jesus a Peasant? Implication for Reading the Samaritan Story (Luke 10:30–35).”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 22: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, Richard L. (1991). “The Pre-Industrial City in Luke-Acts: Urban Social Relations.” Jerome H. Neyrey, ed.The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson. 125–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1993). “A Peasant Reading of the Parable of the Talents/Pounds: A Text of Terror?”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 23: 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A.J. and S.C. Garrod. (1981).Understanding Written Language: Explorations of Comprehension Beyond the Sentence. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Rodney. (1996).The Rise of Christianity: A Sociologist Reconsiders History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, Michael. (1980).The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malina, B.J. Embedded economics: The irrelevance of Christian fictive domestic economy. FSSE 26, 1–20 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770061

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770061

Keywords

Navigation