Abstract
When reading the New Testament, the modern historically-minded interpreter would do well to keep in view that early Christian traditions emerged in the advanced agrarian societies of the first-century, eastern Mediterranean. In these societies, kinship and political institutions, roles, and norms determined economic and religious institutional behavior. That is, religious and economic structures were always embedded in either the kin group or the political group. Hence, to understand the “economic” assumptions and behaviors described in the New Testament, the interpreter must develop scenarios that fit the document’s historical and social context; the alternative is a necessarily anachronistic and ethnocentric reading. This essay articulates some basic perspectives entailed in historically and culturally sensitive interpretations of Old Testament and New Testament passages dealing with “economics”. The methodology employed here is a broadly based “social scientific criticism,” focusing on reading theory and cultural anthropology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballard, B. (1994). “On the Sin of Usury: A Biblical Economic Ethic.”Christian Scholars' Review. 24: 210–228.
Barr, David L. (1995).New Testament Story: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Carney, Thomas F. (1973).The Economies of Antiquity. Lawrence, KS: Coronado.
— (1975).The Shape of the Past: Models and Antiquity. Lawrence, KS: Coronado.
Casson, Ronald W. (1983). “Schemata in Cognitive Anthropology.”Annual Review of Anthropology. 12: 429–462.
Finley, Moses I. (1973).The Ancient Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Garfinkel, Harold. (1967).Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hall, Edward T. (1976).Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
— (1983).The Dance of Life: The Other Dimensions of Time. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Halliday, Michael A.K. (1978).Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Hamel, Gildas. (1990).Poverty and Charity in Roman Palestine: First Three Centuries C.E. University of California Publications: Near Eastern Studies 23. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Haviland, S.E. and H.H. Clark. (1974). “What’s New? Acquiring New Information As a Process in Comprehension.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 13: 512–521.
Kronemer, Alexander. (January 28, 1997). “The Bible as a Model for Democracy: Was Socrates More of a Bolshevik?”Christian Science Monitor 89, no 43: 19.
Malina, Bruce J. (1986a).Christian Origins and Cultural Anthropology: Practical Models for Biblical Interpretation. Atlanta: John Knox.
— (1986b). “Interpreting the Bible with Anthropology: The Question of Poor and Rich.”Listening. 21: 148–159.
— (1987). “Wealth and Poverty in the New Testament and Its World.”Interpretation. 41: 354–367. Reprinted as “Wealth and Poverty in the New Testament World.” Max L. Stackhouse, Dennis P. McCann, Shirley J. Roels and Preson N. Williams, eds. (1995).On Moral Business: Classical and Contemporary Resources for Ethics in Economic Life. Grand Rapids: Eerdman, 88–93.
— (1991). “Reading Theory Perspective: Reading Luke-Acts.” Jerome H. Neyrey, ed.The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 3–23. Reprinted as “Reading Theory Perspectives.” Bruce J. Malina. (1996).The Social World of Jesus and the Gospels. London/New York: Routledge, 3–31.
— (1993).The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Rev. ed. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox.
— (1996a). “Mediterranean Sacrifice: Dimensions of Domestic and Political Religion.”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 26: 26–44.
— (1996b). “Social Scientific Criticism and Rhetorical Criticism: Why Won't Romanticism leave Us Alone?” Stanley E. Porter and Thomas H. Olbricht, eds.Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Protoria Conference. (JSNT Sup) Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. 71–101.
Meyer, Bonnie J.F. and G. Elizabeth Rice. (1984). “The Structure of Text.” P. David Pearson. ed.Handbook of Reading Research, New York: Longman. 319–351.
Moxnes, Halvor. (1987). “The Economy in the Gospel of Luke in Light of Social Anthropology.” Halvor Moxnes, ed.Economy in the New Testament. Urkristendommen: Prosjektshefte 2. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo. 1–35.
—. (1988).The Economy of the Kingdom: Social Conflict and Economic Interaction in Luke’s Gospel. Overtures to Biblical Theology. Philadelphia: Fortress.
Niedercorn, John H. (1985). “Two Biblical Conceptions of an Equitable and Efficient Economy.”Review of Social Economy. XLIII, 2: 181–192.
Oakman, Douglas E. (1986).Jesus and the Economic Questions of His Day. Lewiston NY: Edwin Mellen.
— (1991a). “The Countryside in Luke-Acts.” Jerome H. Neyrey, ed.The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson. 151–179.
— (1991b). “BTB Readers Guide: The Ancient Economy in the Bible.”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 21: 34–39.
— (1992). “Was Jesus a Peasant? Implication for Reading the Samaritan Story (Luke 10:30–35).”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 22: 117–125.
Rohrbaugh, Richard L. (1991). “The Pre-Industrial City in Luke-Acts: Urban Social Relations.” Jerome H. Neyrey, ed.The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson. 125–149.
— (1993). “A Peasant Reading of the Parable of the Talents/Pounds: A Text of Terror?”Biblical Theology Bulletin. 23: 32–39.
Sanford, A.J. and S.C. Garrod. (1981).Understanding Written Language: Explorations of Comprehension Beyond the Sentence. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Stark, Rodney. (1996).The Rise of Christianity: A Sociologist Reconsiders History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taussig, Michael. (1980).The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malina, B.J. Embedded economics: The irrelevance of Christian fictive domestic economy. FSSE 26, 1–20 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770061
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770061