Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of perceived task and type of presentation in student response to instructional television

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C. M.. In search of a visual rhetoric for instructional television.AV Communication Review, 1972,20(1), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. L.The relationship of interest and attention to retention and attitude change. Iowa City: Iowa University, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. W. An exploratory study of assumed attention given to audio and visual elements in an elementary science TV series.Dissertation Abstracts, 1967,27(7), 2268-A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, G. C., & Schramm, W.Learning from television: What the research says. Stanford: Stanford University, ERIC for Educational Media and Technology, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. Eye movement indices of cognitive behavior.AV Communication Review, 1969,17(4), 383–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. The analysis of instructional objectives for instruction. In R. Glaser, Ed.,Teaching machines and programed learning, II: Data and Directions. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1965. Pp. 21–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. Learning theory, educational media, and individualized instruction.Educational Broadcasting Review, 1970,4(3), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. Some second thoughts on S-R theory and ITV.Educational Broadcasting Review, 1969,3(1), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., Wolf, W., de Groot, S., Knemeyer, M., Van Atta, R., & Light, L.. Eye movements and TV viewing in children.AV Communication Review, 1964,12(4), 386–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J. M. A strategy for instructional television research.AV Communication Review, 1971,19(2), 149–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. A behavioral measure of television viewing.Journal of Advertising Research, 1962,2(3), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, D. W., & Reid, J. C.Research in instructional television and film. Washington, D.C.: US Office of Education, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, C. J. Applying learning theory to television instruction.NAEB Journal, 1965,24(6), 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, K. W. Questioning the questions of ETV research.Educational Broadcasting Review, 1968,2(6), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, K. W. Media-message interactions in TV.Viewpoints (Indiana University School of Education), 1970,46(5), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldstad, J. A. Selective review of research studies showing media effectiveness: A primer for media directors.AV Communication Review, 1974,22(4), 387–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, P., & Wallace, W. H. An operant behavioral measure of TV commercial effectiveness.Journal of Advertising Research, 1965,5(4), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin, W.Cue summation in multiple channel communication. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickell, D.A critical review of the methodology and results of research comparing televised and face-to-face instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1963.

  • Winer, B.J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettl, H. The study of television aesthetics.Educational Broadcasting Review, 1968,2(1), 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Telecommunications at Indiana University, IN 47401, Bloomington

    Kenneth J. Ksobiech (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. Kenneth J. Ksobiech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ksobiech, K.J. The importance of perceived task and type of presentation in student response to instructional television. AVCR 24, 401–412 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770054

Keywords

Search

Navigation