Advertisement

ECTJ

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 15–21 | Cite as

Using “Sesame Street” to facilitate children’s recognition of letters and numbers

  • Robert A. Reiser
  • Naja Williamson
  • Katsuaki Suzuki
Articles

Abstract

How can adults who watch “Sesame Street” with children facilitate the children’s recognition of the letters and numbers presented on the show? In order to examine this question, each of 95 preschool children watched three specially edited versions of “Sesame Street” with an adult who either (a) asked the child questions and provided feedback, (b) only asked questions, (c) directed the child’s attention to the screen, or (d) simply watched the shows with the child. Those children in the Questions + Feedback condition and the Questions condition scored significantly higher on a delayed posttest than did children who just watched the shows with an adult. There were no other significant differences among the treatment conditions. Results indicate that adults can increase children’s recognition of letters and numbers presented on “Sesame Street” by asking the children to name the letters and numbers as they are presented. Other interpretations are also discussed.

Keywords

Treatment Condition Feedback Condition Mental Effort White Child Posttest Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, S., & Bogatz, G. A. (1970).The first year of Sesame Street: An evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 047 823).Google Scholar
  2. Cook, T. D., & Curtin, T. R. (1985). Evaluating the CTW model for producing educational television.Educational Communication and Technology journal, 33, 91–112.Google Scholar
  3. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Filep, R. T., Millar, G. R., & Gillette, P. T. (1971).The Sesame mother project. El Segundo, CA: Institute for Educational Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 055 676).Google Scholar
  5. Kintsch, W. (1977).Memory and cognition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Lesser, G. S. (1974).Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Lorch, E. P., Anderson, D. R., & Levin, S. R. (1979). The relationship of visual attention to children’s comprehension of television.Child Development, 50, 722–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis,journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 770–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palmer, E. L. (1978, October).A pedagogical analysis of recurrent formats on Sesame Street and The Electric Company. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Educational Broadcasters, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Pezdek, K., & Hartman, E. F. (1983). Children’s television viewing: Attention and comprehension of auditory versus visual information.Child Development, 54, 1015–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reiser, R. A., Tessmer, M. A., & Phelps, P. C. (1984). Adult-child interaction in children’s learning from “Sesame Street.”Educational Communication and Technology journal, 32, 217–223.Google Scholar
  12. Salomon, G. (1977). Effects of encouraging Israeli mothers to co-observe “Sesame Street” with their five-year-olds.Child Development, 48, 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources.Educational Psychologist 18, 42–50.Google Scholar
  14. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions,journal of Educational Psychology 76, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Reiser
    • 1
  • Naja Williamson
    • 1
  • Katsuaki Suzuki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchFlorida State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations