Conclusions
The results of this investigation showed that significant differences did exist at the 01 level among instructional treatments. A comparison of mean performance scores across groups (rows) and tasks (columns) showed that instructional treatments ranked as follows: 1) self-instruction, 2) lecturedemonstration (classroom), 3) lecture-demonstration (television), and 4) minimal-instruction. The socioeconomic background of subjects did not influence instructional treatment. Subjects from all three socioeconomic levels learned best from self-instruction.
Under the conditions of this study, time was not a significant factor or causal effect in differences that resulted among instructional treatments.
Self-instruction was found to be the most effective method of teaching subjects from different socioeconomic levels to perform manipulatory tasks. This study substantiates the findings of an early experiment conducted by Calder (1966) with college students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Calder, C. R. A comparison of the relative effectiveness of four methods of teaching manipulative activities.Psychology in the Schools, 1966,3(3), 250–252.
Edwards, A. L.Experimental design in psychological research. (Rev. ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1960.
Snow, R. W., & Salomon, G. Aptitudes and instructional media. Project on individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables.AV Communication Review, 1969,17, 345.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calder, C.R. A comparison of four methods of teaching psychomotor activities to elementary school children from varying socioeconomic levels. ECTJ 18, 25–31 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769440
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769440