Skip to main content
Log in

Comment: A source of questions

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiry.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Espistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1983a).A feeling for the organism San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F.. (1983b). Feminism, science, and democracy.Democracy, 3(2), 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H., & Rose, S. (1980).Ideology of lin the natural sciences Boston: G. K. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L. (1984). The evolution of the idea of reason and its educational consequence.McGill Journal of Educational, 19(2), 189–197.Stephen T. Ken is Professor of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, W.D. Comment: A source of questions. ECTJ 33, 66–69 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769344

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769344

Keywords

Navigation