Skip to main content
Log in

Differential relationships between personality and performance under dissimilar modes of instruction

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, R. C. The computer is a tutor.Psychology Today, 1968,34(8), 36–39 & 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. J. Learner variables and educational media.Review of Educational Research, 1968,38, 160–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, B. A., & Doty, L. A. Programed instructional effectiveness in relation to certain student characteristics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964,55, 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropper, G. L., & Kress, G. C., Jr. Individualizing instruction through pacing procedures.AV Communication Review, 1965,13, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P.Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. (4th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. N.Learning outcomes of a computer-based multi-media introductory physics course. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Amercian Educational Research Association, Chicago, February 1968.

  • Hansen, D. H., & Dick, W.Semiannual progress report: January 1,1967 through June 30, 1967. CAI Center, Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Hansen, D. N., Dick, W., & Lippert, H. T.Semiannual progress report: July 1,1967 through December 31,1967. CAI Center, Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Hickey, A. E. (Ed.)Computer-assisted instruction: A survey of the literature. (3rd ed.) Newburyport, Mass.: Entelek, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kight, H. R., & Sassenrath, J. M. Relationship of achievement motivation and test anxiety to performance in programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 14–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, R. P., Nelson, W. H., & King, F.J. Identification and definition of subject matter content variables related to human aptitudes. Final Report, U.S. Office of Education #OE-5-10-297, January, 1967.

  • Lublin, S. C. Reinforcement schedules, scholastic aptitude, autonomy need, and achievement in a programed course.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A., & May, M. A. Mass communication and educational media.Annual Review of Psychology, 1965,16, 475–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F. State anxiety and task difficulty using CAI media. In D. Hansen, W. Dick, & H. T. Lippert,Annual progress report: January 1, 1967 through December 31, 1967. CAI Center, Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Snow, R.Aptitude-instructional treatment interactions: Selected findings and hypotheses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, February 1969.

  • Suppes, P. Modern learning theory and the elementary school curriculum.American Educational Research Journal, 1964,1, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.Progress report: Stanford program in computer-assisted instruction for the period April 1, 1968 to June 30, 1968, Institute for mathematical studies in the social sciences. Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, A. B., Faltz, C., & Wagner, D. Effects of learner characteristics on programed learning performance.Psychology in the Schools, 1966,3, 72–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Kenneth Majer was at the Florida State University when this study was conducted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majer, K. Differential relationships between personality and performance under dissimilar modes of instruction. AVCR 18, 169–179 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769168

Keywords

Navigation