Skip to main content
Log in

Preschoolers’ learning when pictures do not tell the whole story

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preschool children heard two ten-sentence stories. Each sentence was accompanied by two pictures (one of the subject and one of the object of the sentence), by a picture of the sentence’s subject, by a picture of the sentence’s object, or by no pictures. After presentation of the stories, the children answered questions requiring recall of the sentence objects. Only the two-picture illustration variation produced significantly beffer learning relative to no-picture control performance. This finding held both when children were instructed to make mental images representing the prose and when they simply listened to the text. The results are relevant both to theories of children’s imagery and to practical issues about how to illustrate children’s texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension.Review of Educational Research, 42, 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. G., & Levin, J. R. (1976). Motor activity, anticipated motor activity, and young children’s associative learning.Child Development, 47, 560–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, J., Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1977). Pictures, partial pictures, and young children’s oral prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haring, M. J., & Fry, M. A. (1979). Effect of pictures on children’s comprehension of written text.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 27, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). The effects of text illustrations: A review of research.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1976). What have we learned about maximizing what children learn? In J. R. Levin & V. L. Allen (Eds.),Cognitive learning in children: Theories and strategies. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1981). On functions of pictures in prose. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.),Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., & Lesgold, A. M. (1978). On pictures in prose.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 26, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E., Pressley, M., Caldwell, C, &Hackling, M. (April, 1985).Developmental differences in children’s memory for prose when part of the picture is missing. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children’s learning: Putting the picture in development perspective.Review of Educational Research,47, 585–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Heisel, B., McCormick, C. B., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). Memory strategy instruction with children. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.),Progress in cognitive development research, (Vol. 2),Verbal processes in children. New York: Springer-Verlag, 125–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & MacFadyen, J. (1983). The development of mnemonic mediator usage at testing.Child Development, 54, 474–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Pigott, S., & Bryant, S. L. (1982). Picture content and preschoolers’ learning from sentences.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkel, W., & Bornstein, M. H. (1980). Pictures and imagery both enhance children’s shortterm and long-term recall.Developmental Psychology, 16, 153–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Readence, J. E., &Moore, D. W. (April, 1980).A meta-analysis of research on the effect of adjunct aids on learning from text. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

  • Rohwer, W. D. Jr. (1973). Elaboration and learning in childhood and adolescence. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, M. D., & Levin, J. R. (1979). Partial pictures as imagery-retrieval cues in young children’s prose recall,journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1980). The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuinman, J. L. (1973/1974). Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in 5 major tests.Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 206–223.AWARDS PROGRAM FOR OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENTS IN INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant to the second author from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Digdon, N., Pressley, M. & Levin, J.R. Preschoolers’ learning when pictures do not tell the whole story. ECTJ 33, 139–145 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769115

Keywords

Navigation