Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the CTW model for producing educational television

  • Articles
  • ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the twelfth ERIC /ECTJ Annual Review Paper, preparation of which was supported by the ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) Clearinghouse on Information Resources, Syracuse University. The material in this article was prepared pursuant to a contract with the National Institute of Education. U.S. Department of Education. Contractors undertaking such projects under government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their judgment in professional and technical matters. Points of view or opinions do not necessarily represent the official view or opinion of the NIE. - Ed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, S., & Bogatz, G. A. (1970).The first year of Sesame Street: An evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Bogatz, G. A. (1973).Reading with television: An evaluation of The Electric Company. New York: Childrens Television Workshop (ERIC Document No. ED 073 178).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R.,&Mouton, J. S. (1962). Overevaluation of own group’s product in intergroup competition.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology,64, 237–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogatz, G. A., & Ball, S. (1971).The second year of Sesame Street: A continuing evaluation (Vols. 1 and 2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. (1984).A review of research on the educational potential of 3-2-1 Contact: A children’s TV series on science and technology. New York: Children’s Television Workshop and The National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D. (1985). Post-positivist critical multiplism. In L. Shotland, & M. M. Mark (Eds.),Social Science and Social Policy, (pp. 21–62) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Leviton, L. C, & Shadish, W. R. (in press). Program evaluation. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.

  • Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (1978).An evaluation of Over Easy: A television series for and about older people. Washington DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, V. (1980). Content development for children’s television programs. In E. L. Palmer & A. Dorr (Eds.),Children and the Faces of Television: Teaching, Violence, Selling (pp. 33–48). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1980).Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1982).Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Guerrero, R., & Holtzman, W. H. (1974). Learning by televised “Plaza Sesamo” in Mexico,Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 632–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, J. S (1980).Working together: A study of cooperation among producers, educators, and researchers to create educational television. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., & Ettema, J. S. (1982).Positive images: Breaking stereotypes with childrens television. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, H. W. (1972).The Children’s Television Workshop: How and why it works. Jericho, NY: Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, G. S. (1974).Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mates, B. F. (1980). Current Emphases and Issues in planned programming for children. In E. L. Palmer & A. Dorr (Eds.),Children and the Faces of Television: Teaching, Violence, Selling (pp. 19–32). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAnany, E. G., Oliveira, J. B., Orivel, F., & Stone, J. (1983). Distance education: Evaluating new approaches in education for developing countries.Evaluation in Education, 6, 289–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, K. W., & Chen, M. (1981).Children, television, and science: an overview of the formative research for 3-2-1 Contact. New York: Children’s Television Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, K. W., & Swinehart, J. W. (1976).Evaluation of the Feeling Good Television Series. New York: Children’s Television Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. N. (1980).Assessment of the ESAA-TV program: An examination of its production, distribution and financing (Contract No. 300-77-0468). Washington, DC: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R., & Gillis, L. (1979).Research for decision making during television production: The OECA model. Toronto: Ontario Educational Communications Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E. L. (1974). Formative research in the production of television for children. In D. Olson (Ed.),Media and symbols: The form of expression, communication and education. The seventy-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E. L. (1976). Forward. In K. W. Mielke & J. W. Swinehart,Evaluation of the Feeling Good television series (pp. xiii-xxvi). New York: Childrens Television Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E. L. (1978, June).A pedagogical analysis of recurrent formats on Sesame Street and The Electric Company. Paper presented at the International Conference on Children’s Television, Amsterdam.

  • Price, D. S. (1963).Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiroga, B., &Crane, V. (1978, November).Formative evaluation of a local television production for children. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Educational Broadcasters, Washington, DC.

  • Roberts, D. F. (n.d.).An evaluation of Over Easy: Reactions of older viewers to a new television series. San Francisco: KQED.

  • Rockman, S. (1976, October).The use of decisionoriented research in the development of school television materials. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Educational Broadcasters, Chicago.

  • Rushnell, S. A. (1980). Networks non-primetime programming. In S. T. Eastman, S. W. Head, & L. Klein (Eds.),Broadcasting programming in strategies for winning television and radio audiences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W. L., Nelson, L. M., & Betham, M. T. (1981).Bold experiment: the story of educational television in American Samoa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1981).The logic of evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edgepress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F., La Rose, R., & Frost, F. (1981).Children, Television, and Sex-Role Stereotyping. New York: Praeger. LESLIE BRIGGS Leslie Briggs passed away on February 2nd, 1985. He edited and authored several of the most popular books in our field and served as an Editorial Consultant toECTJ from 1973 to 1977. His contribution has been most significant, and he will be sorely missed by all of us.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, T.D., Curtin, T.R. Evaluating the CTW model for producing educational television. ECTJ 33, 91–112 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769110

Keywords

Navigation