Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-administered instruction versus traditionally administered instruction: Economics

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badger, H.G.Statistics of higher education 1957–58, receipts, expenditures, and property. (OE-50023-58), Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, J.E., Estavan, D.P., Melaragno, R.J., & Silberman, H.F. Effects of branching in a computer controlled auto-instructional device.J. appl. Psychol., 1962,46, 389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. Retention as a function of paired and individual use of programed instruction.J. Programed Instruction, 1963,11 (3), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, Carol J., & Schloss, S.Statistics of state school systems, 1959–60. Circular 691 (OE-20020-60), Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. L, & McNamara, W. J. A comparative study of programed and conventional instruction in industry.J. appl. Psychol., 1961,45, 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, J. H., Runyon, R. P., & Desiderato, O.Television in Army training: Evaluation of television in Army basic training. HumRRO Technical Report 14. Washington, D.C.: George Washington Univer., November 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopstein, F. F.The amplified teacher: The guidance of human learning through controlling functional automata. Research Memorandum RM-65-15. Princeton N.J.: Educational Testing Service, October 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopstein, F. F., Cave, R. T.Preliminary cost comparison of technical training by conventional and programed learning methods. Technical Documentary Report MRL-TDR-62–79. Ohio: Behavioral Sciences Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, July 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopstein, F. F., Zachert, V., & Cave, R. T.Preliminary evaluation of prototype automated technical training course. Technical Documentary Report MRL-TDR-62–78. Ohio: Behavioral Sciences Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, July 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Association, Research Division.Estimates of school statistics, 1965–66. Research Report 1965-R17. Washington, D.C.: the Association, December 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. H., Glaser, R., Abma, J. S., & Morgan, R. L.Repetition and spaced review in programed instruction. Technical Report AMRL-TR-64–128. Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Labs., Wright-Patterson AFB, December 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, R. T., Jr., Duva, J. S., & Murray, J. E.Training by television,television recordings and conventional classroom procedures. Port Washington, L.I., N.Y.: NAVEXOS, Special Devices Center, U.S. Navy, undated.

  • Seidel, R. J. Programed learning: Prologue to instruction.Psychol. Rep., 1967,20, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, H. F., Melaragno, R. J., Coulson, J. E., & Estavan, D. P. Fixed sequence versus branching auto-instructional methods.J. educ. Psychol., 1961,52, 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, K. A., & Fullam, Marie G.Projections of educational statistics to 1974–75. Circular 790 (OE-10030-65), Office of Educattion, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, K. A., & Grant, W. V.Digest of educational statistics, 1965 edition. Bulletin No. 4 (OE-10024–65), Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Resources Research Office’s Division No. 1 (System Operations), The George Washington University, Washington D.C.

    Felix F. Kopstein & Robert J. Seidel

Authors
  1. Felix F. Kopstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is a condensation of HumRRO Professional Paper 31–67 based on research conducted under Exploratory Study 42, Organization of Instruction. HumRRO operates under contract with the Department of the Army (DA 44–188-ARO-2). The contents of this paper are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position, unless so designated by other authorized documents.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopstein, F.F., Seidel, R.J. Computer-administered instruction versus traditionally administered instruction: Economics. AVCR 16, 147–175 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769096

Keywords

Search

Navigation