Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aptitudes and instructional media

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, W. H. Audio visual communication. In C. W. Harms (Ed.),Encyclopedia of educational research (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1960. Pp. 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almstead, F. E. & Graf, R. W. Talkback: The missing ingredient.Audio-Visual Instruction, 1960,110-112.

  • Amirian, G. T. The retention by elementary school children of natural science material and of science attitude and interest changes following a program of science teaching by television. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1962.

  • Cattell, R. B.Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1957,12, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnè, R. M. Problem solving. In A. W. Melton (Ed.),Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press, 1964. Pp. 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagè, R. M. (Ed.)Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, O. J., Nordquist, E. C, & Engar, K. M. Teaching the use of the slide rule via television. KUED, University of Utah, July 1959 (offset).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropper, G. L. & Lumsdaine, A. A. An experimental comparison of a conventional TV lesson with a programmed TV lesson requiring active student response. Studies in Televised Instruction, Report No. 2 USOE Project No. 336. Pittsburgh: Metropolitan Pittsburgh Education Television Station WQED-WQEX and American Institutes for Research, March 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P.The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. The human dimension in teaching.Association for Higher Education College and University Bulletin, March 16, 1955.

  • Hoban, C. F., Jr. & Van Ormer, E. B.Instructional film research (Rapid mass learning), 1918–1950. Technical Report No. SDC 269-7-19. Port Washington, L.I., N. Y.: United States Navy Special Devices Center, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L. & Kelley, H. H.Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D.Experiments in mass communication. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. N. & Bollenbacher, J. K. An experimental study of the effectiveness of televised versus classroom instruction in sixth grade science in the Cincinnati public schools, 1956–1957.Journal of Educational Research, 1959,52, 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. B. A comparative study of an introductory geography course on ETV and in classroom. St. Paul, Minnesota: Macalester College, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, J. M. & Rosenstein, A. J. Television in army training: Color vs. black and white.AV Communication Review, 1960,8, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, J. H., Runyon, R. P., & Desiderato, O. Television in army training: Evaluation of television in army training. George Washington University Technical Report 14. Washington, D.C.: Human Resources Research Office, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, J. H. & Wesley, P. M. Television in basic training: The improvement of training by television.AV Communication Review, 1963,11, 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, M. E. A study of information and vocabulary achievement from teaching of natural science by television in the fifth grade. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1961.

  • Kress, G. C, Jr. & Gropper, G. L. A comparison of two strategies for individualizing fixed-paced programmed instruction.American Educational Research Journal, 1966, 3, 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, D. W. & Reid, J. C.Abstracts of research on instructional television and film, Volume I-II. Pennsylvania State University, April 1964.

  • Pryluck, C. & Snow, R. E. Toward a psycholinguistics of cinema.AV Communication Review, 1967,15, 54–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. Cultural differences in reading and understanding geographic maps. Paper presented at the national convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, February 1968.

  • Salomon, G. & McDonald, F. J. Pre-and posttest reactions to self-viewing one’s teaching performance on videotape. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1968.

  • Salomon, G. & Snow, R. E. The specification of film attributes for psychological and educational research purposes. Stanford University Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Research Memorandum No. 27, March 1968. (Also inAV Communication Review, 1968,16, 225–244.)

  • Schramm, W. What do we know about learning from instructional television. In W. Schramm (Ed.),Educational television, the next ten years. Stanford: The Institute for Communication Research, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J. & Streufert, S.Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E. The relationship between test anxiety and children’s need for memory support in problem solving. Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Research Memorandum No. 11, September 1967.

  • Snow, R. E., Tiffin, J., & Seibert, W. E. Individual differences and instructional film effects.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, P. & Streufert, S. Information search as a function of conceptual and environmental complexity.Psychonomic Science, 1966, 4, 351–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, B. M. & Barrow, L. C, Jr. Exploring the news: A comparative study of the teaching effectiveness of radio and television.AV Communication Review, 1959, 7, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeaman, D. & House, B. J. The relation of IQ and learning. In R. M. Gagnè, (Ed.),Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California

    Richard E. Snow (assistant professor) & Gavriel Salomon (graduate research assistant)

Authors
  1. Richard E. Snow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gavriel Salomon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with the Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Contractors undertaking such projects under government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their professional judgment in the conduct of the project. Points of view or opinions stated do not, therefore, necessarily represent official Office of Education position or policy. A portion of this paper was presented at the National Association of Educational Broadcasters —Instructional Division, Santa Barbara, California, April 4, 1966.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snow, R.E., Salomon, G. Aptitudes and instructional media. AVCR 16, 341–357 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769071

Keywords

Search

Navigation