Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints and Hamiltonian in light-front quantized field theory

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

A self-consistent Hamiltonian formulation of scalar theory on the null plane is constructed and quantized following the Dirac procedure. The theory contains alsoconstraint equations which would lead, if solved, to a non-local Hamiltonian. In contrast to the equal-time formulation we obtain a different description of the spontaneous symmetry breaking in the continuum and the symmetry generators are found to annihilate the light-front vacuum. Two examples are given where the procedure cannot be applied self-consistently. The corresponding theories are known to be ill-defined from the equal-time quantization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. A. M. Dirac:Rev. Mod. Phys.,21, 392 (1949).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. 150, 1313 (1966);J. B. Kogut andD. E. Soper:Phys. Rev. D,1, 2901 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. C. Pauli andS. J. Brodsky:Phys. Rev. D,32, 1993, 2001 (1985);Phys. Rev. D,32, 2001 (1985); recent review:S. J. Brodsky andH. C. Pauli:Schladming Lectures, SLAC preprint SLAC-PUB-5558/91 and the references therein.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. G. Wilson:Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl),17 (1990);R. J. Perry, A. Harindranath andK. G. Wilson:Phys. Rev. Lett.,65, 2959 (1990).

  5. P. A. M. Dirac:Lectures in Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, N.Y., 1964). See alsoE. C. G. Sudarshan andN. Mukunda:Classical Dynamics: a Modem Perspective (Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1974);A. Hanson, T. Regge andC. Teitelboim:Constrained Hamiltonian Systems (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma, 1976).

  6. T. Maskawa and K. Yamawaki:Prog. Theor. Phys.,56, 270 (1976);N. Nakanishi andK. Yamawaki:Nucl. Phys. B,122, 15 (1977);R. S. Wittman: inNuclear and Particle Physics on the Light-Cone, edited byM. B. Johnson andL. S. Kisslinger (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Th. Heinzl, St. Krusche andE. Werner: Regensburg preprint TPR 91–23,Phys. Lett. B,256, 55 (1991); 272, 54 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. P. Srivastava:Spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism in light-front quantized field theory — Discretized formulation, preprint, Ohio State University 92-0173 (Slac PPF-9222), April 1992.

  9. The separation of the background field and its treatment as a dynamical variable were suggested in Ohio State preprints 91-0481 (Slac PPF-9148) and 92-0012 (Slac PPF-9202), November and December 91, onSpontaneous symmetry breaking andHiggs mechanism in light-front quantized field theory, respectively.

  10. Prem P. Srivastava:Light-front field theory and nature of phase transition in (Φ4)2theory, Padova University preprint DFPF/93/TH/18, March 1993.

  11. S. Coleman:Commun. Math. Phys.,31, 259 (1973).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,29, 1698 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prem P. Srivastava.

Additional information

The author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, P.P. Constraints and Hamiltonian in light-front quantized field theory. Nuov Cim A 107, 549–557 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768789

PACS 12.90

Navigation