Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized comparison of once-daily ceftibuten and twice-daily clarithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

  • Addendum
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an evaluator-blind, paralled-group, multicenter study, the efficacy and tolerability of ceftibuten 400 mg capsules once daily were compared with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7–14 days in the treatment of 309 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Clinical (n=262) and microbiological (n=71) assessments were conducted before treatment, during days 4–6 of treatment, and at 0–6 and 7–21 days after treatment. Clinical efficacy success rates (cure/improvement) at the end of treatment (0–6 days) were 91.0% for ceftibuten and 93.0% for clarithromycin. In the intent-to-treat population, the overall clinical assessment showed a success rate of 77.6% (121/156) in the ceftibuten group and 78.4% (120/153) in the clarithromycin group (95% confidence interval, −10.8 to +9.0%). One patient in each of the ceftibuten and clarithromycin groups had a microbiological relapse and became a treatment failure. The overall success rate was 84.3% for ceftibuten and 86.7% for clarithromycin (C.I. −11.7%, +6.9%). Overall eradication of the target pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, andStreptococcus pneumoniae) was 84.8% for ceftibuten and 89.5% for clarithromycin. Eradication rates for ceftibuten at 0–6 days post treatment were 95.2% (H. influenzae), 87.5% (M. catarrhalis), and 100% (S. pneumoniae), compared with 85.7%, 100% and 100%, respectively, for clarithromycin. Significantly fewer patients in the ceftibuten group experienced treatmentrelated adverse events than in the clarithromycin group (5.3 vs 21.9%; p<0.001). This difference was due to a large number of patients in the clarithromycin group reporting taste perversion (12.6%) or gastrointestinal adverse events (9.9%). Given its tolerability and efficacy profiles, and the advantage of once-daily administration, ceftibuten provides a rational alternative for the treatment of AECB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prager, K., Turczyn, K., Lancashire, J., Smith, S.: National Center for Health Statistics data line. Public Health Report. 1994 vol. 109, issue 5. pp. 713–714.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds, H. Y.: Chronic bronchitis and acute infectious exacerbations. In:Mandell, G. L., Bennett, J. E., Dolin, R., (eds.): Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1995, pp. 608–612.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anthionisen, N. R., Manfreda, J., Warren, C. P. W., Herschfield, E. S., Harding, G. K. M., Nelson, N. A.: Antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 106 (1987), 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neu, H. C., Chick, T. W.: Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin compared to cefixime as outpatient treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. Chest 104 (1993) 1393–1399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elbashier, A. M., Al-Salem, A. H., Al-Jama, A. H., Khogali, A., Abusrair, H., Khot, A. P., Malik, A. G.: Bronchopulmonary infection due toMoraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis at Qatif Central Hospital. Ann. Saudi Med. 12 (1992) 562–564.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cazzola, M., Ariano, R., Gioia, V., Mancini, V., Rimoldi, R., Scala, G., Scoccia, S., Girbino, G.: Bacterial isolates and cigarette smoking in patients with chronic bronchitis: results from an Italian multicenter survey. Clin. Ther. 12 (1990) 105–117.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensch, G. W., Klaustermeyer, W. B., McCarty, J., Schworer, P. B., Taglietti, M. A.: Efficacy and safety of once-daily ceftibuten vs. twice-daily ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 4 (2 Suppl.) (1995) S80-S87.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hosie, J., Quinn, P., Smite, P., Sides, G.: A comparison of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36 (1995) 173–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Verghese, A., Roberson, D., Kalbfleisch, J. H., Sarubbi, F.: Randomized comparative study of cefixime versus cephalexin in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34 (1990) 1041–1044.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Turk, D. C.: Clinical importance ofHaemophilus influenzae-1981. In:Sell, S. H., Wright, P. F. (eds.):Haemophilus influenzae: epidemiology, immunology and prevention of disease. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York 1982, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chodosh, S.: Acute bacterial exacerbations in bronchitis and asthma. Am. J. Med. 82 (Suppl. 4A) (1987) 154–163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thabaut, A., Meyran, M., Sofer, L., Morand, A., Labia, R.: Interactions of ceftibuten with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a bacteriological and enzymatic analysis. Drugs Exp. Clin. Res. 20 (1994 49–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, R. N.: Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720): a review of United States and Canadian results. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis 14 (1991) 37–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedland, I. R., McCracken, G. H. Jr.: Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistantStreptococcus pneunoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 331 (1994) 377–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, R. N.: Ceftibuten: a review of antimicrobial activity, spectrum, and other microbiologic features. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 14 (Suppl.) (1995) S77-S83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doern, G. V.:In vitro activity of ceftibuten againstHaemophilus influenzae andBranhamella catarrhalis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14 (1991) 75–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, R. N., Barry, A. L., andThe Collaborative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Group: Ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720): comparative antimicrobial activity against 4735 clinical isolates, beta-lactamase stability, and broth microdilution quality control guidelines. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 7 (1988) 802–807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wise, R., Andrews, J. M., Ashby, J. P., Thornber, D.: Ceftibutenin-vitro activity against respiratory pathogens, β-lactamase stability and mechanism of action. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26 (1990) 209–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shawar, R., LaRocco, M., Cleary, T. G.: Comparativein vitro activity of ceftibuten (Sch 39720) against bacterial enteropathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 781–784.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauernfeind, A.: Ceftibuten and bactericidal kinetics. Comparativein vitro activity againstEnterobacteriaceae producing extended spectrum β-lactamases. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14 (1991) 89–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hardy, D. J.: Extent and spectrum of the antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 12 (Suppl.) (1993) S99-S105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fraschini, F., Scaglione, F., Demartini, G.: Clarithromycin clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 25 (1993) 189–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wyngaarden, J. B., Smith, L. H. Jr.,Bennett, J. C.: (eds.): Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 19th ed. W. B. Sauders Company, Philadelphia (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kamumer, R. B., Ress, R.: Randomized comparative study of ceftibuten versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14 (1991) 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cockburn, J., Gibberd, R. W., Reid, A. L., Sanson-Fischer, R. W.: Determinants of non-compliance with short term antibiotic regimens. Br. Med. J. 295 (1987) 814–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eraker, S., Kirscht, J. P., Becker, M. H.: Understanding and improving patient compliance. Ann. Intern. Med. 100 (1984) 258–268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eisen, S. A., Douglas, K. M., Woodward, R. S., Spitznagel, E., Przybeck, T. R.: The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch. Intern. Med. 150 (1990) 1881–1884.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wandstrat, T. L., Kaplan, B.: Pharmacoeconomic impact of factors affecting compliance with antibiotic regimens in the treatment of otitis media. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 16 (1997) S27-S29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Perotta, R., McCabe, R., Rumans, L., Nolen, T.: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ceftibuten and cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 3 (1994) 270–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elliott, M., Taglietti, M.: Ceftibuten in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Poster presented at the 19th International Congress of Chemotherapy, July 16–21, 1995, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

  31. Bachand, R. T. Jr.: Comparative study of clarithromycin and ampicillin in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27 (Suppl. A) (1991) 91–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziering, W., McElvaine, P. Randomized comparison of once-daily ceftibuten and twice-daily clarithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Infection 26, 68–75 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768764

Keywords

Navigation