Skip to main content
Log in

Value components of teacherś judgments of educational objectives

  • Departments
  • Teaching Machines and Programed Instructior
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Atkin, J. M. “Some Evaluation Problems in a Course Content Improvement Project.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1: 129–32; 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bottenberg, R. A., and Christal, R. E. “An Iterative Technique for Clustering Criteria Which Retains Optimum Predictive Efficiency.” WADD-TN-61-30. Texas: Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Personnel Laboratory, Wright Air Development Division, 1961.16 pp.

  3. Butler, J. G.An Analysis and Measurement of Value Orientations as Related to Delinquent Behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1957.

  4. Downey, L. W.The Task of Public Education. Chicago: Midwest Administration Center, University of Chicago, 1960. 88 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dressel, P. R., and Mayhew, L. B.General Education: Explorations in Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1954. 302 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisner, E. W.“Educational Objectives: Help or Hindrance.” Paper presented to the 50th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, February 1966.

  7. Hoffman, P. J. “The Paramorphic Representation of Clinical Judgment.”Psychological Bulletin 57: 116–31; 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krathwohl, D. R. “Stating Objective Appropriately for Program, for Curriculum and for Instructional Materials Development.”Journal of Teacher Education 16: 83–92; 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mager, R. R.Preparing Objectives for Programmed Instruction. San Francisco: Fearon, 1962. 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris, C. W.Signification and Significance: A Study of the Relations of Signs and Values. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1964. 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohnmacht, F. W. “Factor Analysis of Ranked Educational Objectives: An Approach to Value Orientation.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 25: 437–47; 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons, T.The Social System. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1951-575 PP.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodwan, A. S., and Hake, H. W. “The Discriminant Function as a Model for Perception.”American journal of Psychology 77: 380–92; 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Runkel, P. J. “Cognitive Similarity in Facilitating Communications.”Sociometry 19: 178–91; 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schönemann, P. H. “A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem.”Psychometrika 31: 1–10; 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scriven, M. “The Methodology of Evaluation.”AERA Monograph Series in Education, No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967. PP-39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, E. R.; Tyler, R. W.; and the Evaluation Staff.Appraising and Recording Student Progress. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1942.550 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taba, H.Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1962. 529 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor, P. A.“ The Mapping of Concepts.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1966.

  20. Taylor, P. A., and Maguire, T. O.“A Theoretical Evaluation Model.”Manitoba Journal of Educational Research 1: 12–17; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tucker, L.“Learning Theory and Multivariate Experiment: Illustration by Determination of Generalized Learning Curves.”Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. (Edited by R. B. Cattell.) Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966. pp. 476–501.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wherry, R. J., and Naylor, J. C. “Comparison of Two Approaches -JAN and PROF—for Capturing Rater Strategies.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 26: 267–86; 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filep, R.T., Maguire, T.O. Value components of teacherś judgments of educational objectives. AVCR 16, 63–86 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768682

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768682

Keywords

Navigation