Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rear-view and traditional projectors for educational films: A comparison

  • Published:
Audiovisual communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  1. Distributed by McGraw-Hill Text-Films, New York Citv.

  2. Lindquist, E. F.Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1953, p. 190–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kansas, USA

    Robert W. Ridgway Dr. (director of Elementary Education) & Dale P. Scannell Dr. (director of the Bureau of Educational Research and Service)

Authors
  1. Robert W. Ridgway Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dale P. Scannell Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridgway, R.W., Scannell, D.P. Rear-view and traditional projectors for educational films: A comparison. AVCR 10, 137–139 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768588

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768588

Keywords

Search

Navigation