References
Evans, J. L., Glaser, R., and Homme, L. E. “A Preliminary Investigation of Variation in the Properties of Verbal Learning Sequences of the ‘Teaching Machine’ Type,”Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book, edited by A. A. Lumsdaine and R. Glaser. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, 1960, p. 446–451.
Silverman, R. E., and Alter, M. “Note on the Response in Teaching Machine Programs,”Psychological Reports, Vol. 7, 1960, p. 496.
Goldbeck, Robert A., Campbell, Vincent N., and Llewellyn, Joan E.Further Experimental Evidence on Response Modes in Automated Instruction, Technical Report No. 3. Pittsburgh, Penn.: American Institute for Research, December 1960.
Keislar, Evan, and McNeil, John, “Active Versus Passive Instruction in a Teaching Machine Program with Primary School Children.” A paper presented before the California Educational Research Association, Annual Conference, March 4, 1961, Palo Alto, California.
Keislar, Evan, and McNeil, John, “Teaching Scientific Theory to First Graders by an Auto-Instructional Device,”Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, Winter 1961. p. 73–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNeil, J.D., Keislar, E.R. Questionsversus statements as stimuli to children’s learning. AVCR 10, 85–88 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768579
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768579