Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does “programed” television need active responding?

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carpenter, C. R., and Greenhill, L. P.Comparative Research on Methods and Media for Presenting Programmed Courses in Mathematics and English. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University, March 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gropper, G. L.Controlling Student Responses During Visual Presentations, Report No. 2. Studies in Televised Instruction: The Role of Visuals in Verbal Learning. Study No. 1—An Investigation of Response Control During Visual Presentations. Study No. 2—Integrating Visual and Verbal Presentations. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, October 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ——. “Learning from Visuals: Some Behavioral Considerations.”AV Communication Review 14: 37–69; Spring 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gropper, G. L., and Glasgow, Zita.Studies in Televised Instruction: An Experimental Evaluation of Methods for Improving “Conventional” Television Lessons. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, October 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gropper, G. L.; Lumsdaine, A. A.; and Shipman, Virginia.Improvement of Televised Instruction Based on Student Responses to Achievement Tests, Report No. 1.Studies in Televised Instruction: The Use of Student Response To Improve Televised Instruction. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, March 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gropper, G. L, and Lumsdaine, A. A.An Experimental Comparison of a Conventional TV Lesson with a Programmed TV Lesson Requiring Active Student Response, Report No. 2.Studies in Televised Instruction: The Use of Student Response To Improve Televised Instruction. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, March 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —, and Lumsdaine, A. A..An Experimental Evaluation of the Contribution of Sequencing, Pre-testing and Active Student Response to the Effectiveness of “Programmed” TV Instruction, Report No. 3.Studies in Televised Instruction: The Use of Student Response To Improve Televised Instruction. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, March 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —, and Lumsdaine, A. A..Issues in Programming Instructional Materials for Televised Presentation, Report No. 5.Studies in Televised Instruction: The Use of Student Response To Improve Televised Instruction. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, March 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —, and Lumsdaine, A. A..An Overview, Report No. 7.Studies in Televised Instruction: The Use of Student Response To Improve Televised Instruction. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, March 1961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. American Institutes for Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

    George L. Gropper (director of the Instructional Media Program)

Authors
  1. George L. Gropper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported here (4) was performed under a grant (No. 7-48-7670-245) from the Office of Education, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, under the provisions of Title VII of the National Defense Education Act.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gropper, G.L. Does “programed” television need active responding?. AVCR 15, 5–22 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768570

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768570

Keywords

Search

Navigation