Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generalizability of rules for empirical revision

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Glass, G. V., & Hakstian, R. Measures of association in comparative experiments.American Educational Research Journal, 1969,7 (3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropper, G. L., & Lumsdaine, A. A. The use of student response to improve televised instruction: An overview. Report No. 7 (Summary of six prior reports),Studies in televised instruction. Report No. AIR-C13-61-FR-245 (VTT). Pittsburgh: American Institutes for Research, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. L.Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. Instruments and media of instruction. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Pp. 583–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M. Empirical testing of programs. In P. Lange (Ed.),Programed Instruction: Part II, The Sixty-Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967. Pp. 104–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M.Good frames and bad. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeck, M. A study of the revision process in programmed instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1965.

  • Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.),Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1. Chicago: Rand Mc-Nally, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, H. C., Melaragno, J. R., & Newmark, G.Use of exploratory research and individual tutoring techniques for the development of programming methods and theory. Final Report NDEA Project 7-14-0000-181. Santa Monica, Calif.: System Development Corporation, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles

    Eva L. Baker (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. Eva L. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was jointly supported by a University Research Grant, University of California, Los Angeles, and the UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, E.L. Generalizability of rules for empirical revision. AVCR 18, 300–305 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768502

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768502

Keywords

Search

Navigation