Skip to main content
Log in

Retention of prose material as a function of rate of presentation and difficulty of material

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Enc, M. A. The effect of two different wpm listening rates on learning and retention of blind school children.Dissertation Abstracts, 1959,19, 2512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, G., Guttman, N., & Miron, M. Effects of time compression upon the comprehension of connected speech,Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1957,22, 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulke, E. The retention of information presented at an accelerated word rate.The International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1966,16, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulke, E., (Ed.)Proceedings of the Louisville conference on time compressed speech, October 19–21. Louisville, Ky., University of Louisville, Center for Rate Controlled Recordings, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulke, E., Amster, C. H., Nolan, C. Y., & Bixler, R. H. The comprehension of rapid speech by the blind.Exceptional Children, 1962,29, 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. L., Orr, D. B., Freedle, R. O., & Norris, C. M.Further research on speeded speech as an educational medium. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D. The intelligibility of speeded speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,45, 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, G. Listener comprehension of compressed speech when the difficulty level of the content and the sex of the listener are varied. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, 1967.

  • Goldstein, H.Reading and listening comprehension at various rates. Teachers College, Columbia University Contributions to Education, No. 821. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman-Malamuth II, L. An experimental study of the effects of rate of speaking upon listenability.Speech Monographs, 1957,24, 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, K. A. Listenability and rate of presentation.Speech Monographs, 1955,22, 57–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, W. G. Recognition of time compressed speech as a function of word length and frequency of usage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1966.

  • Mowbray, G. H. Simultaneous vision and audition: The comprehension of prose passages with varying levels of difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,46, 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. E. The effect of variation of rate on the recall by radio listeners of “straight” newscasts.Speech Monographs, 1948,15, 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, W. T. Listening: Directions for research.Elementary English, 1962,39, 574–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. H. Comprehension of compressed speech as a function of difficulty of material. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1968.

  • Wood, C. D. Comprehension of compressed speech by elementary school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1965.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

George, R.G. Retention of prose material as a function of rate of presentation and difficulty of material. AVCR 18, 291–299 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768501

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768501

Keywords

Navigation