Abstract
The literature on algorithmic teaching and learning has had relatively insignificant influence on the technology of instructional design. A possible explanation is the fact that the subject has rarely been treated from a designer’s point of view. In this article, a number of useful terms/concepts are offered to facilitate the process of understanding and creating algorithms. A procedure is suggested for applying these concepts in the context of an information processing model. Empirical evidence of the concepts’ utility is offered. The ensuing design prescriptions are shown to be both theoretically and empirically valid, yet easy to recognize and use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bower, G.H. (1975). Cognitive psychology: An introduction. In W.K. Estes, (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carpenter, P., & Just, M.A. (1977). Reading comprehension as eyes see it. In M.A. Just & P. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 109–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gerlach, V.S., Reiser, R.A., & Brecke, F.M. (1975).Algorithms in learning, teaching, instructional design (Technical Report No. 51201). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.
Horabin, I., & Lewis, B. (1974).Algorithms. Charleston, WV: Ivan Horabin.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Kulik, J.A., Bangert, R.L., & Williams, Q.W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 16–26.
Landa, L.N. (1974).Algorithms in learning and instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Landa, L.N. (1976).Instructional regulation and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Landa, L.N. (1983). The algo-heuristic theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.)Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Markle, S.M. (1978). Teaching conceptual networks.N.S.P.I. Journal, 17(2), 4–7.
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Miller, G.A. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1976).Language and perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level.Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pask, G. (1975).Conversation, cognition and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Roblyer, M.D. (1981) When is it “good courseware”? Standards for microcomputer courseware.Educational Technology, 21(10), 47–54.
Salomon, G. (1979).Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Scandura, J.M. (1977).Problem solving: A structural/process approach with instructional implications. New York: Academic Press.
Scandura, J.M. (1980). Theoretical foundations of instruction: A systems alternative to cognitive psychology.Journal of Structural Learning, 6, 347–394.
Scandura, J.M., Durnin, J., Ehrenpreis, W., & Luger, G. (1971).Algorithmic approach to mathematics: concrete behavioral foundations. New York: Harper & Row.
Schmid, R.F. (1977). Prior knowledge, content familiarity and the comprehension of natural prose.Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, DDJ77–17881.
Schmid, R.F., & Gerlach, V.S. (1977).The application of algorithms to instructional systems (Technical Report No. 70821). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.
Schmid, R.F., & Gerlach, V.S. (1978).Principles for developing algorithmic instruction (Technical Report No. 81201). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.
Schmid, R.F., Gerlach, V.S., & Valach, M. (1978).The relationship between algorithmic processes for instruction and computer models. (Technical Report No. 81203). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.
Schmid, R.F., Portnoy, R.C., & Burns, K. (1976). Using algorithms to assess comprehension of classroom text materials.Journal of Educational Research, 69, 309–312.
Snow, R.E. (1976).Theory and method for research on aptitude processes. (Technical Report No. 2). Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford University.
Thorndike, P.W. & Yekovich, F.R. (1980). A critique of schemata as a theory of human story memory.Poetics, 9, 23–49.
Winn, W. (1982). Visualization in learning and instruction: A cognitive approach.Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 3–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmid, R.F., Gerlach, V.S. An analysis of algorithmic processes and instructional design. ECTJ 34, 163–174 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768423
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768423