Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of algorithmic processes and instructional design

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on algorithmic teaching and learning has had relatively insignificant influence on the technology of instructional design. A possible explanation is the fact that the subject has rarely been treated from a designer’s point of view. In this article, a number of useful terms/concepts are offered to facilitate the process of understanding and creating algorithms. A procedure is suggested for applying these concepts in the context of an information processing model. Empirical evidence of the concepts’ utility is offered. The ensuing design prescriptions are shown to be both theoretically and empirically valid, yet easy to recognize and use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bower, G.H. (1975). Cognitive psychology: An introduction. In W.K. Estes, (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P., & Just, M.A. (1977). Reading comprehension as eyes see it. In M.A. Just & P. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 109–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, V.S., Reiser, R.A., & Brecke, F.M. (1975).Algorithms in learning, teaching, instructional design (Technical Report No. 51201). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horabin, I., & Lewis, B. (1974).Algorithms. Charleston, WV: Ivan Horabin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J.A., Bangert, R.L., & Williams, Q.W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, L.N. (1974).Algorithms in learning and instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, L.N. (1976).Instructional regulation and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, L.N. (1983). The algo-heuristic theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.)Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S.M. (1978). Teaching conceptual networks.N.S.P.I. Journal, 17(2), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1976).Language and perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level.Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1975).Conversation, cognition and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M.D. (1981) When is it “good courseware”? Standards for microcomputer courseware.Educational Technology, 21(10), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1979).Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J.M. (1977).Problem solving: A structural/process approach with instructional implications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J.M. (1980). Theoretical foundations of instruction: A systems alternative to cognitive psychology.Journal of Structural Learning, 6, 347–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J.M., Durnin, J., Ehrenpreis, W., & Luger, G. (1971).Algorithmic approach to mathematics: concrete behavioral foundations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R.F. (1977). Prior knowledge, content familiarity and the comprehension of natural prose.Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, DDJ77–17881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R.F., & Gerlach, V.S. (1977).The application of algorithms to instructional systems (Technical Report No. 70821). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R.F., & Gerlach, V.S. (1978).Principles for developing algorithmic instruction (Technical Report No. 81201). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R.F., Gerlach, V.S., & Valach, M. (1978).The relationship between algorithmic processes for instruction and computer models. (Technical Report No. 81203). Bolling AFB, DC: USAF/OSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R.F., Portnoy, R.C., & Burns, K. (1976). Using algorithms to assess comprehension of classroom text materials.Journal of Educational Research, 69, 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. (1976).Theory and method for research on aptitude processes. (Technical Report No. 2). Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford University.

  • Thorndike, P.W. & Yekovich, F.R. (1980). A critique of schemata as a theory of human story memory.Poetics, 9, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1982). Visualization in learning and instruction: A cognitive approach.Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmid, R.F., Gerlach, V.S. An analysis of algorithmic processes and instructional design. ECTJ 34, 163–174 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768423

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768423

Keywords

Navigation